Louis Zinkin
Biographic Data
| ID | 5445571 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Louis Zinkin |
| GIVEN NAMES | Louis |
| FAMILY NAME | Zinkin |
| SIGNATURE | ZINKIN L |
| AFFILIATIONS | Transnational Press London |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 25 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 55 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 25 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1969 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2008 |
| H-INDEX | 4 |
Discussion of Zinkin's paper ‘Your Self
Your Self
In this paper(1), written in draft form in 1991 and now posthumously published, the late Louis Zinkin(2) presents a constructivist view of the self. He considers some of the paradoxes in Jungian definitions of the self and compares these to Winnicott's 'forbidden question' regarding the transitional object: 'Did you find it or did you make it?'. He argues that, for the purposes of a coherent scientific theory, these apparent paradoxes need to be …
A Dialogical Model for Group Analysis
Dialogue is introduced as the key element in both group and Jungian analysis, with particular reference to Bakhtin's notion of dialogue as central to a new conception of the relationship between the individual and society. The free-flowing discourse of the therapy group is seen as analogous to free association in analysis and the role of the conductorlanalyst in dealing with these is compared. The growth in the group of the group mind and the enr…
All's Well that Ends Well. Or is it
Borderline Distortions of Mirroring in the Group
Mirroring, thought to be of therapeutic value in group analysis, can lead to great difficulties when people see each other in distorted ways. This process, which I have called `malignant mirroring', can reflect borderline features in the individuals concerned, who together maintain a mutually destructive pattern. With the help of a clinical example, this process is examined in this short panel contribution
Discussion on Paper by Andrew Powell II
The Klein Connection in the London School
A Gnostic View of the Therapy Group
The Group as Container and Contained
The Grail and the Group
The Hologram as a Model for Analytical Psychology
Some Thoughts on Deintegration
Discussion on paper by Raúl Usandivaras
Discussion on Paper by Peter Homans
Paradoxes of the Self
Reply to Comment by N. Schwartz‐Salant
Three Models are Better than One
Malignant Mirroring
Invited Discussion on Malcolm Pines' Lecture
From
Workshop On Group Psychotherapy of Psychosis, 19/20th April, 1980
The Collective and the Personal
Person to person
The Medical Section is a meeting place for those concerned with psychotherapy. We come from different schools, each of which has its own ways of thinking and its own ways of approaching patients, but over the years we have learnt to communicate extraordinarily well with each other, and looking back I can remember very few occasions when I have felt there to be a serious gulf between us. I do not mean there has been lack of disagreement, but there…
Death in Venice’—A Jungian View
Flexibility in Analytic Technique
Your Self
In this paper(1), written in draft form in 1991 and now posthumously published, the late Louis Zinkin(2) presents a constructivist view of the self. He considers some of the paradoxes in Jungian definitions of the self and compares these to Winnicott's 'forbidden question' regarding the transitional object: 'Did you find it or did you make it?'. He argues that, for the purposes of a coherent scientific theory, these apparent paradoxes need to be …
The Klein Connection in the London School
Flexibility in Analytic Technique
The Hologram as a Model for Analytical Psychology
Discussion of Zinkin's paper ‘Your Self
The Collective and the Personal
Some Thoughts on Deintegration
Person to person
The Medical Section is a meeting place for those concerned with psychotherapy. We come from different schools, each of which has its own ways of thinking and its own ways of approaching patients, but over the years we have learnt to communicate extraordinarily well with each other, and looking back I can remember very few occasions when I have felt there to be a serious gulf between us. I do not mean there has been lack of disagreement, but there…
Death in Venice’—A Jungian View
Paradoxes of the Self
Flexibility in Analytic Technique
Death in Venice’—A Jungian View
Person to person
The Medical Section is a meeting place for those concerned with psychotherapy. We come from different schools, each of which has its own ways of thinking and its own ways of approaching patients, but over the years we have learnt to communicate extraordinarily well with each other, and looking back I can remember very few occasions when I have felt there to be a serious gulf between us. I do not mean there has been lack of disagreement, but there…
The Collective and the Personal
From
Workshop On Group Psychotherapy of Psychosis, 19/20th April, 1980
Invited Discussion on Malcolm Pines' Lecture
Malignant Mirroring
Three Models are Better than One
Discussion on paper by Raúl Usandivaras
Discussion on Paper by Peter Homans
Paradoxes of the Self
Reply to Comment by N. Schwartz‐Salant
Some Thoughts on Deintegration
The Hologram as a Model for Analytical Psychology
A Gnostic View of the Therapy Group
The Group as Container and Contained
The Grail and the Group
Discussion on Paper by Andrew Powell II
The Klein Connection in the London School
Borderline Distortions of Mirroring in the Group
Mirroring, thought to be of therapeutic value in group analysis, can lead to great difficulties when people see each other in distorted ways. This process, which I have called `malignant mirroring', can reflect borderline features in the individuals concerned, who together maintain a mutually destructive pattern. With the help of a clinical example, this process is examined in this short panel contribution
All's Well that Ends Well. Or is it
A Dialogical Model for Group Analysis
Dialogue is introduced as the key element in both group and Jungian analysis, with particular reference to Bakhtin's notion of dialogue as central to a new conception of the relationship between the individual and society. The free-flowing discourse of the therapy group is seen as analogous to free association in analysis and the role of the conductorlanalyst in dealing with these is compared. The growth in the group of the group mind and the enr…
Discussion of Zinkin's paper ‘Your Self
Your Self
In this paper(1), written in draft form in 1991 and now posthumously published, the late Louis Zinkin(2) presents a constructivist view of the self. He considers some of the paradoxes in Jungian definitions of the self and compares these to Winnicott's 'forbidden question' regarding the transitional object: 'Did you find it or did you make it?'. He argues that, for the purposes of a coherent scientific theory, these apparent paradoxes need to be …
Psychology (22 works) · Psychoanalysis (15 works) · Computer Science (12 works) · Library science (10 works) · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (10 works) · Citation (9 works) · Philosophy (7 works) · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (6 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Psychotherapist (5 works)