Lola L Lopes
Biographic Data
| ID | 5449999 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Lola L Lopes |
| GIVEN NAMES | Lola L |
| FAMILY NAME | Lopes |
| SIGNATURE | LOPES L L |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Iowa |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 10 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1972 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1995 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Algebra and Process in the Modeling of Risky Choice
Three Misleading Assumptions in the Customary Rhetoric of the Bias Literature
In their commentary on Lopes (1991), Oaksford and Chater (1992) assume that (1) the psychological literature was once rife with presumptions of normative rationality; (2) bias research illustrates the bounded rationality viewpoint; and (3) people would not violate rational rules if they knew the correct rule and were relieved of the need for computation. Although these assumptions are shared by many, none stands up to scrutiny
The Rhetoric of Irrationality
The popularity of the `biases and heuristics' literature is examined critically in terms of the rhetorical factors that have mediated widely published claims that human judgment abilities are poor and even irrational. The logic of the original experiments is examined as well as the factors that cause that logic to be ambiguous and the implications of the experiments to be misrepresented. Questionable use of evaluative language in scientific artic…
Between Hope and Fear: The Psychology of Risk
Integration theory applied to judgments of group attractiveness
A unified integration model for “prior expectancy and behavioral extremity as determinants of attitude attribution”
A unified integration model for “prior expectancy and behavioral extremity as determinants of attitude attribution”
Integration theory applied to judgments of group attractiveness
Between Hope and Fear: The Psychology of Risk
The Rhetoric of Irrationality
The popularity of the `biases and heuristics' literature is examined critically in terms of the rhetorical factors that have mediated widely published claims that human judgment abilities are poor and even irrational. The logic of the original experiments is examined as well as the factors that cause that logic to be ambiguous and the implications of the experiments to be misrepresented. Questionable use of evaluative language in scientific artic…
Three Misleading Assumptions in the Customary Rhetoric of the Bias Literature
In their commentary on Lopes (1991), Oaksford and Chater (1992) assume that (1) the psychological literature was once rife with presumptions of normative rationality; (2) bias research illustrates the bounded rationality viewpoint; and (3) people would not violate rational rules if they knew the correct rule and were relieved of the need for computation. Although these assumptions are shared by many, none stands up to scrutiny
Algebra and Process in the Modeling of Risky Choice
Psychology (5 works) · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Cognitive psychology (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Mathematics (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (2 works) · Rationality (2 works)