Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Matthew J Page

Biographic Data

ID5457944
NAMEMatthew J Page
GIVEN NAMESMatthew J
FAMILY NAMEPage
SIGNATUREPAGE M J
AFFILIATIONSMonash University
ORCID0000-0002-4242-7526
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS15
TOTAL CITATIONS0
AUTHOR COUNT14
EDITOR COUNT1
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
H-INDEX0
  • Prisma2020

    Open Access•Neal Haddaway, Matthew J Page et al.•ARTICLE•Campbell Systematic Reviews•2022

  • A declaração PRISMA 2020

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•Revista Panamericana de Salud…•2022

    A declaração dos Principais Itens para Relatar Revisões Sistemáticas e Meta-análises (PRISMA), publicada em 2009, foi desenvolvida para ajudar revisores sistemáticos a relatar de forma transparente por que a revisão foi feita, os métodos empregados e o que os autores encontraram. Na última década, os avanços na metodologia e terminologia de revisões sistemáticas exigiram a atualização da diretriz. A declaração PRISMA 2020 substitui a declaração d…

  • Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2021

  • Prisma-S

    Open Access•Melissa L Rethlefsen, Shona Kirtley et al.•ARTICLE•Systematic Reviews•2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•PLoS Medicine•2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2021

  • Declaración PRISMA 2020

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•Revista Española de Cardiología…•2021

    La declaración PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses), publicada en 2009, se diseñó para ayudar a los autores de revisiones sistemáticas a documentar de manera transparente el porqué de la revisión, qué hicieron los autores y qué encontraron. Durante la última década, ha habido muchos avances en la metodología y terminología de las revisiones sistemáticas, lo que ha requerido una actualización de esta guía. La…

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Surgery•2021

  • PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, David Moher et al.•ARTICLE•BMJ•2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•BMJ•2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•Systematic Reviews•2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Matthew J Page, Joanne Mckenzie et al.•PREPRINT•2020

    Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did and what they found. Over the last decade, there have been many advances in systematic review methodology and terminology, which have necessitated an update to the guideline.Objectives: To develop the PRISMA 2020 statem…

  • Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

    Open Access•Farhad Shokraneh, Carol Lefebvre et al.•BOOK•Cochrane Handbook for Systematic…•2019

    The revised edition of the Handbook offers the only guide on how to conduct, report and maintain a Cochrane Review The second edition of The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions contains essential guidance for preparing and maintaining Cochrane Reviews of the effects of health interventions. Designed to be an accessible resource, the Handbook will also be of interest to anyone undertaking systematic reviews of interventions o…

  • RoB 2

    Open Access•Jonathan Sterne, Jelena Savović et al.•ARTICLE•BMJ•2019

    Assessment of risk of bias is regarded as an essential component of a systematic review on the effects of an intervention. The most commonly used tool for randomised trials is the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. We updated the tool to respond to developments in understanding how bias arises in randomised trials, and to address user feedback on and limitations of the original tool.

  • Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews

    Miranda Cumpston, Tianjing Li et al.•ARTICLE•Cochrane Database of Systematic…•2019

No prominent works on this page.

  • Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

    Open Access•Farhad Shokraneh, Carol Lefebvre et al.•BOOK•Cochrane Handbook for Systematic…•2019

    The revised edition of the Handbook offers the only guide on how to conduct, report and maintain a Cochrane Review The second edition of The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions contains essential guidance for preparing and maintaining Cochrane Reviews of the effects of health interventions. Designed to be an accessible resource, the Handbook will also be of interest to anyone undertaking systematic reviews of interventions o…

  • RoB 2

    Open Access•Jonathan Sterne, Jelena Savović et al.•ARTICLE•BMJ•2019

    Assessment of risk of bias is regarded as an essential component of a systematic review on the effects of an intervention. The most commonly used tool for randomised trials is the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. We updated the tool to respond to developments in understanding how bias arises in randomised trials, and to address user feedback on and limitations of the original tool.

  • Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews

    Miranda Cumpston, Tianjing Li et al.•ARTICLE•Cochrane Database of Systematic…•2019

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Matthew J Page, Joanne Mckenzie et al.•PREPRINT•2020

    Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did and what they found. Over the last decade, there have been many advances in systematic review methodology and terminology, which have necessitated an update to the guideline.Objectives: To develop the PRISMA 2020 statem…

  • Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2021

  • Prisma-S

    Open Access•Melissa L Rethlefsen, Shona Kirtley et al.•ARTICLE•Systematic Reviews•2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•PLoS Medicine•2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2021

  • Declaración PRISMA 2020

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•Revista Española de Cardiología…•2021

    La declaración PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses), publicada en 2009, se diseñó para ayudar a los autores de revisiones sistemáticas a documentar de manera transparente el porqué de la revisión, qué hicieron los autores y qué encontraron. Durante la última década, ha habido muchos avances en la metodología y terminología de las revisiones sistemáticas, lo que ha requerido una actualización de esta guía. La…

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Surgery•2021

  • PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, David Moher et al.•ARTICLE•BMJ•2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•BMJ•2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•Systematic Reviews•2021

  • Prisma2020

    Open Access•Neal Haddaway, Matthew J Page et al.•ARTICLE•Campbell Systematic Reviews•2022

  • A declaração PRISMA 2020

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•Revista Panamericana de Salud…•2022

    A declaração dos Principais Itens para Relatar Revisões Sistemáticas e Meta-análises (PRISMA), publicada em 2009, foi desenvolvida para ajudar revisores sistemáticos a relatar de forma transparente por que a revisão foi feita, os métodos empregados e o que os autores encontraram. Na última década, os avanços na metodologia e terminologia de revisões sistemáticas exigiram a atualização da diretriz. A declaração PRISMA 2020 substitui a declaração d…

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 works) · Computer Science (5 works) · MEDLINE (5 works) · Systematic review (5 works) · Medicine (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Checklist (3 works) · Delphi Technique in Research (3 works) · Guideline (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae