S Kanazawa
Biographic Data
| ID | 5459819 |
|---|---|
| NAME | S Kanazawa |
| GIVEN NAMES | S |
| FAMILY NAME | Kanazawa |
| SIGNATURE | KANAZAWA S |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0690-0993 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 30 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2000 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
An introduction to the special issue on the nature and evolution of Totemism, Shamanism, religions, and spirituality
Social sciences are branches of biology
Since biology is the study of living organisms, their behaviour and social systems, and since humans are living organisms, it is possible to suggest that social sciences (the study of human behaviour and social systems) are branches of biology and all social scientific theories should be consistent with known biological principles. To claim otherwise and to establish a separate science only for humans might be analogous to the establishment of hy…
Science vs. History: A Reply to MacDonald
The disagreement between MacDonald and me recapitulates a recurrent debate in sociology about what sociology should be. I believe it should be science; MacDonald believes it should be history. We are therefore talking past each other, because one cannot be judged by the standards of the other. Science is not history. History is not science
A Bit of Logic Goes a Long Way: A Reply to Sanderson
Sanderson's comment (Social Forces 80:1) is marred by logical and factual errors. Most of them stem from its confusion of a polygynous marriage with a polygynous society misinterpretation of basic principles of evolutionary biology and psychology and errors in statistical argument
De Gustibus Est Disputandum
Journal Article De Gustibus Est Disputandum Get access Satoshi Kanazawa Satoshi Kanazawa Indiana University of Pennsylvania Direct all correspondence to: Satoshi Kanazawa, Department of Sociology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15705-1087. Email: [email protected]. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, Volume 79, Issue 3, March 2001, Pages 1131–1162, https://doi.org/10.1353/s…
Scientific discoveries as cultural displays: A further test of Miller's courtship model
De Gustibus Est Disputandum
Journal Article De Gustibus Est Disputandum Get access Satoshi Kanazawa Satoshi Kanazawa Indiana University of Pennsylvania Direct all correspondence to: Satoshi Kanazawa, Department of Sociology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15705-1087. Email: [email protected]. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, Volume 79, Issue 3, March 2001, Pages 1131–1162, https://doi.org/10.1353/s…
Social sciences are branches of biology
Since biology is the study of living organisms, their behaviour and social systems, and since humans are living organisms, it is possible to suggest that social sciences (the study of human behaviour and social systems) are branches of biology and all social scientific theories should be consistent with known biological principles. To claim otherwise and to establish a separate science only for humans might be analogous to the establishment of hy…
Science vs. History: A Reply to MacDonald
The disagreement between MacDonald and me recapitulates a recurrent debate in sociology about what sociology should be. I believe it should be science; MacDonald believes it should be history. We are therefore talking past each other, because one cannot be judged by the standards of the other. Science is not history. History is not science
A Bit of Logic Goes a Long Way: A Reply to Sanderson
Sanderson's comment (Social Forces 80:1) is marred by logical and factual errors. Most of them stem from its confusion of a polygynous marriage with a polygynous society misinterpretation of basic principles of evolutionary biology and psychology and errors in statistical argument
Scientific discoveries as cultural displays: A further test of Miller's courtship model
Science vs. History: A Reply to MacDonald
The disagreement between MacDonald and me recapitulates a recurrent debate in sociology about what sociology should be. I believe it should be science; MacDonald believes it should be history. We are therefore talking past each other, because one cannot be judged by the standards of the other. Science is not history. History is not science
A Bit of Logic Goes a Long Way: A Reply to Sanderson
Sanderson's comment (Social Forces 80:1) is marred by logical and factual errors. Most of them stem from its confusion of a polygynous marriage with a polygynous society misinterpretation of basic principles of evolutionary biology and psychology and errors in statistical argument
De Gustibus Est Disputandum
Journal Article De Gustibus Est Disputandum Get access Satoshi Kanazawa Satoshi Kanazawa Indiana University of Pennsylvania Direct all correspondence to: Satoshi Kanazawa, Department of Sociology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15705-1087. Email: [email protected]. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, Volume 79, Issue 3, March 2001, Pages 1131–1162, https://doi.org/10.1353/s…
Social sciences are branches of biology
Since biology is the study of living organisms, their behaviour and social systems, and since humans are living organisms, it is possible to suggest that social sciences (the study of human behaviour and social systems) are branches of biology and all social scientific theories should be consistent with known biological principles. To claim otherwise and to establish a separate science only for humans might be analogous to the establishment of hy…
An introduction to the special issue on the nature and evolution of Totemism, Shamanism, religions, and spirituality
Psychology (5 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Biology (3 works) · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (3 works) · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (2 works) · Psychoanalysis (2 works) · Aesthetics (1 works) · Anthropology (1 works)