Patrick M Bossuyt
Biographic Data
| ID | 5473113 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Patrick M Bossuyt |
| GIVEN NAMES | Patrick M |
| FAMILY NAME | Bossuyt |
| SIGNATURE | BOSSUYT P M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Academic Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-4427-0128 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 14 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 14 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1991 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
A declaração PRISMA 2020
A declaração dos Principais Itens para Relatar Revisões Sistemáticas e Meta-análises (PRISMA), publicada em 2009, foi desenvolvida para ajudar revisores sistemáticos a relatar de forma transparente por que a revisão foi feita, os métodos empregados e o que os autores encontraram. Na última década, os avanços na metodologia e terminologia de revisões sistemáticas exigiram a atualização da diretriz. A declaração PRISMA 2020 substitui a declaração d…
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews
The PRISMA 2020 statement
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Declaración PRISMA 2020
La declaración PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses), publicada en 2009, se diseñó para ayudar a los autores de revisiones sistemáticas a documentar de manera transparente el porqué de la revisión, qué hicieron los autores y qué encontraron. Durante la última década, ha habido muchos avances en la metodología y terminología de las revisiones sistemáticas, lo que ha requerido una actualización de esta guía. La…
The PRISMA 2020 statement
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration
The PRISMA 2020 statement
The PRISMA 2020 statement
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did and what they found. Over the last decade, there have been many advances in systematic review methodology and terminology, which have necessitated an update to the guideline.Objectives: To develop the PRISMA 2020 statem…
Assessing knowledge and attitudes towards screening among users of Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT)
BACKGROUND: Informed decision making is recognized as important in screening. Invitees should be provided with relevant information, enabling them to make an informed decision. This may be more difficult in ethnic minority and low socio-economic status groups. We aimed to assess the proportion of informed decisions to participate in a faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening pilot and to explore differences in know…
Effectiveness of a web-based health risk assessment with individually-tailored feedback on lifestyle behaviour
Dutch Trial Register NTR8148
A possible link between prenatal exposure to famine and breast cancer
In a study of 475 women born around the 1944-1945 Dutch famine, women exposed to prenatal famine more often reported a history of breast cancer than nonexposed women (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-7.7). They also had alterations in reproductive risk factors. Prenatal famine may increase breast cancer incidence
On selecting the right glue, and knowing how and when to use it
No prominent works on this page.
On selecting the right glue, and knowing how and when to use it
A possible link between prenatal exposure to famine and breast cancer
In a study of 475 women born around the 1944-1945 Dutch famine, women exposed to prenatal famine more often reported a history of breast cancer than nonexposed women (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-7.7). They also had alterations in reproductive risk factors. Prenatal famine may increase breast cancer incidence
Effectiveness of a web-based health risk assessment with individually-tailored feedback on lifestyle behaviour
Dutch Trial Register NTR8148
Assessing knowledge and attitudes towards screening among users of Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT)
BACKGROUND: Informed decision making is recognized as important in screening. Invitees should be provided with relevant information, enabling them to make an informed decision. This may be more difficult in ethnic minority and low socio-economic status groups. We aimed to assess the proportion of informed decisions to participate in a faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening pilot and to explore differences in know…
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did and what they found. Over the last decade, there have been many advances in systematic review methodology and terminology, which have necessitated an update to the guideline.Objectives: To develop the PRISMA 2020 statem…
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews
The PRISMA 2020 statement
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Declaración PRISMA 2020
La declaración PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses), publicada en 2009, se diseñó para ayudar a los autores de revisiones sistemáticas a documentar de manera transparente el porqué de la revisión, qué hicieron los autores y qué encontraron. Durante la última década, ha habido muchos avances en la metodología y terminología de las revisiones sistemáticas, lo que ha requerido una actualización de esta guía. La…
The PRISMA 2020 statement
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration
The PRISMA 2020 statement
The PRISMA 2020 statement
A declaração PRISMA 2020
A declaração dos Principais Itens para Relatar Revisões Sistemáticas e Meta-análises (PRISMA), publicada em 2009, foi desenvolvida para ajudar revisores sistemáticos a relatar de forma transparente por que a revisão foi feita, os métodos empregados e o que os autores encontraram. Na última década, os avanços na metodologia e terminologia de revisões sistemáticas exigiram a atualização da diretriz. A declaração PRISMA 2020 substitui a declaração d…
Medicine (6 works) · Psychology (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Pathology (4 works) · Checklist (3 works) · Guideline (3 works) · MEDLINE (3 works) · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Systematic review (3 works)