Joanne E McKenzie

Dados Biográficos

ID5501803
NOMEJoanne E McKenzie
PRENOMESJoanne E
SOBRENOMEMcKenzie
ASSINATURAMCKENZIE J E
AFILIAÇÕESMonash University
ORCID0000-0003-3534-1641
VERIFICADOSim
TOTAL DE OBRAS17
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES5
TOTAL COMO AUTOR17
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO2002
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO2026
ÍNDICE H2

  • Risk, burden, and trend of infectious disease hospitalisations associated with floods

    Open AccessZhengyu Yang, Wenzhong Huang et al.ARTICLEThe Lancet Planetary Health2026Referências: 1

    Australian Research Council, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, National Research Council of Thailand

  • A declaração PRISMA 2020

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLERevista Panamericana de Salud…2022

    A declaração dos Principais Itens para Relatar Revisões Sistemáticas e Meta-análises (PRISMA), publicada em 2009, foi desenvolvida para ajudar revisores sistemáticos a relatar de forma transparente por que a revisão foi feita, os métodos empregados e o que os autores encontraram. Na última década, os avanços na metodologia e terminologia de revisões sistemáticas exigiram a atualização da diretriz. A declaração PRISMA 2020 substitui a declaração d…

  • Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEJournal of Clinical Epidemiology2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEPLoS Medicine2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEJournal of Clinical Epidemiology2021

  • Declaración PRISMA 2020

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLERevista Española de Cardiología…2021

    La declaración PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses), publicada en 2009, se diseñó para ayudar a los autores de revisiones sistemáticas a documentar de manera transparente el porqué de la revisión, qué hicieron los autores y qué encontraron. Durante la última década, ha habido muchos avances en la metodología y terminología de las revisiones sistemáticas, lo que ha requerido una actualización de esta guía. La…

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEInternational Journal of Surgery2021

  • PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, David Moher et al.ARTICLEBMJ2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEBMJ2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLESystematic Reviews2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Matthew J Page, Joanne Mckenzie et al.PREPRINT2020

    Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did and what they found. Over the last decade, there have been many advances in systematic review methodology and terminology, which have necessitated an update to the guideline.Objectives: To develop the PRISMA 2020 statem…

  • Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews

    Open AccessMhairi Campbell, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEBMJ2020

  • Right choice, right time

    Open AccessMagenta B Simmons, Aurora Elmes et al.ARTICLEHealth Expectations2017

    BACKGROUND: Appropriate treatment for youth depression is an important public health priority. Shared decision making has been recommended, yet no decision aids exist to facilitate this. OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to evaluate an online decision aid for youth depression. DESIGN: An uncontrolled cohort study with pre-decision, immediately post-decision and follow-up measurements. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Young people (n=66) a…

  • Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice

    Open AccessSimon French, Simon D French et al.ARTICLEImplementation Science2012

    BACKGROUND: There is little systematic operational guidance about how best to develop complex interventions to reduce the gap between practice and evidence. This article is one in a Series of articles documenting the development and use of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to advance the science of implementation research. METHODS: The intervention was developed considering three main components: theory, evidence, and practical issues. We u…

  • Validation of brief instruments to measure adult fruit and vegetable consumption

    Open AccessLouise A Mainvil, Caroline C Horwath et al.ARTICLEAppetite2011Citada por: 2Referências: 42

  • Validated scales to assess adult decisional balance to eat more fruits and vegetables

    Open AccessLouise A Mainvil, Rob Lawson et al.ARTICLEAppetite2010Citada por: 3Referências: 37

  • Dietary intakes of 6–24-month-old urban South Island New Zealand children in relation to biochemical iron status

    Open AccessPatsy Soh, Elaine L Ferguson et al.ARTICLEPublic Health Nutrition2002

    Objective: To investigate food sources and intakes of iron, and dietary factors associated with serum ferritin levels in 6–24-month-old children. Design: A cross-sectional survey employing proportionate cluster sampling was conducted in 1998/1999. Dietary intakes were assessed using a non-consecutive 3-day weighed food record. Serum ferritin and C-reactive protein were analysed from non-fasting venepuncture blood samples and general sociodemograp…