Mary Chipman
Biographic Data
| ID | 5514028 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Mary Chipman |
| GIVEN NAMES | Mary |
| FAMILY NAME | Chipman |
| SIGNATURE | CHIPMAN M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Kay Teschke, Melody Monro, and Hui Shen are with the School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. M. Anne Harris is with the Occupational Cancer Research Centre, Toronto, Canada. Conor C. O. Reynolds is with the Liu Institute, University of British Columbia. Meghan Winters is with the Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada. Shelina Babul is with the BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit, Vancouver, Canada. Mary Chipman, Michael... |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 15 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2012 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2014 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Bicycling crash circumstances vary by route type: A cross-sectional analysis
These data supplement our previous analyses of relative risks by route type by indicating the types of crashes that occur on each route type. This information can guide municipal engineers and planners towards improvements that would make cycling safer
Personal and trip characteristics associated with safety equipment use by injured adult bicyclists: A cross-sectional study
In two of Canada's largest cities, helmets were the most widely used safety equipment. Measures to increase use of visibility aids on both daytime and night-time cycling trips may help prevent crashes
Route Infrastructure and the Risk of Injuries to Bicyclists: A Case-Crossover Study
Objectives. We compared cycling injury risks of 14 route types and other route infrastructure features. Methods. We recruited 690 city residents injured while cycling in Toronto or Vancouver, Canada. A case-crossover design compared route infrastructure at each injury site to that of a randomly selected control site from the same trip. Results. Of 14 route types, cycle tracks had the lowest risk (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.11; 95% confidence in…
Safe Cycling: How Do Risk Perceptions Compare With Observed Risk
Route Infrastructure and the Risk of Injuries to Bicyclists: A Case-Crossover Study
Objectives. We compared cycling injury risks of 14 route types and other route infrastructure features. Methods. We recruited 690 city residents injured while cycling in Toronto or Vancouver, Canada. A case-crossover design compared route infrastructure at each injury site to that of a randomly selected control site from the same trip. Results. Of 14 route types, cycle tracks had the lowest risk (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.11; 95% confidence in…
Safe Cycling: How Do Risk Perceptions Compare With Observed Risk
Personal and trip characteristics associated with safety equipment use by injured adult bicyclists: A cross-sectional study
In two of Canada's largest cities, helmets were the most widely used safety equipment. Measures to increase use of visibility aids on both daytime and night-time cycling trips may help prevent crashes
Route Infrastructure and the Risk of Injuries to Bicyclists: A Case-Crossover Study
Objectives. We compared cycling injury risks of 14 route types and other route infrastructure features. Methods. We recruited 690 city residents injured while cycling in Toronto or Vancouver, Canada. A case-crossover design compared route infrastructure at each injury site to that of a randomly selected control site from the same trip. Results. Of 14 route types, cycle tracks had the lowest risk (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.11; 95% confidence in…
Safe Cycling: How Do Risk Perceptions Compare With Observed Risk
Bicycling crash circumstances vary by route type: A cross-sectional analysis
These data supplement our previous analyses of relative risks by route type by indicating the types of crashes that occur on each route type. This information can guide municipal engineers and planners towards improvements that would make cycling safer
Environmental health (4 works) · Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (4 works) · Injury prevention (4 works) · Medicine (4 works) · Occupational safety and health (4 works) · Poison control (4 works) · Suicide prevention (4 works) · Traffic and Road Safety (4 works) · Urban Transport and Accessibility (4 works) · Cycling (3 works)