Claire Snyder
Biographic Data
| ID | 5535951 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Claire Snyder |
| GIVEN NAMES | Claire |
| FAMILY NAME | Snyder |
| SIGNATURE | SNYDER C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Johns Hopkins University |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8952-4561 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 23 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 23 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2000 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Truth and dare
This study does not support the hypothesis that patients systematically bias their PROM responses if they know that clinicians will see their results. These findings support using PROMs in clinical practice as a valid mechanism to promote patient-centered care
A PRO-cision medicine intervention to personalize cancer care using patient-reported outcomes
A PRO-cision Medicine Methods Toolkit to Address the Challenges of Personalizing Cancer Care Using Patient-Reported Outcomes
Patients are increasingly being asked to complete standardized, validated questionnaires with regard to their symptoms, functioning, and well-being [ie, patient-reported outcomes (PROs)] as part of routine care. These PROs can be used to inform patients’ care and management, which we refer to as “PRO-cision Medicine.” For PRO-cision Medicine to be most effective, clinicians and patients need to be able to understand what the PRO scores mean and h…
Interpreting and Acting on PRO Results in Clinical Practice
INTRODUCTION: We have used several methods to aid in the interpretation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, and to suggest recommendations for acting on them, both within the PatientViewpoint system and in work done since. METHODS FOR INTERPRETING PRO SCORES: For identifying possibly concerning change scores, PatientViewpoint uses questionnaires' minimally important differences or score worsening >1⁄2 SD. For poor scores in absolute terms, …
In proportion
Making a picture worth a thousand numbers
Presenting comparative study PRO results to clinicians and researchers
Graphic formats for presenting PRO data differ in how accurately they are interpreted and how clear they are perceived to be. These findings will inform the development of best practices for optimally reporting PRO findings
International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the draft European Medicines Agency reflection paper on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies
Communicating patient-reported outcome scores using graphic formats
Cancer patients’ function, symptoms and supportive care needs
Identifying changes in scores on the EORTC-QLQ-C30 representing a change in patients’ supportive care needs
Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 in clinical practice for patient management
Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs)
Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) aims to improve care quality and patient outcomes by providing information that patients, clinicians, and family members need regarding treatment alternatives, and emphasizing patient input to inform the research process. PCOR capitalizes on available data sources and generates new evidence to provide timely and relevant information and can be conducted using prospective data collection, disease registrie…
Relevant content for a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire for use in oncology clinical practice
Needs assessments can identify scores on HRQOL questionnaires that represent problems for patients
PatientViewpoint
Concordance of cancer patients’ function, symptoms, and supportive care needs
Symptoms, supportive care needs, and function in cancer patients
Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice
Issues in the design of Internet-based systems for collecting patient-reported outcomes
Cancer outcomes measurement
The Outcomes of Cancer Outcomes Research
BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of outcomes research, the Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research has proposed a four-level typology that successively distinguishes between research that (1) adds to the knowledge base only, (2) affects practice policies, (3) influences the delivery of care, and (4) leads to changes in health outcomes. The agency has concluded that outcomes research to date has made substantial contributions at level 1, but has…
Evaluation of a measurement strategy for Parkinson's disease
No prominent works on this page.
Evaluation of a measurement strategy for Parkinson's disease
The Outcomes of Cancer Outcomes Research
BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of outcomes research, the Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research has proposed a four-level typology that successively distinguishes between research that (1) adds to the knowledge base only, (2) affects practice policies, (3) influences the delivery of care, and (4) leads to changes in health outcomes. The agency has concluded that outcomes research to date has made substantial contributions at level 1, but has…
Cancer outcomes measurement
Issues in the design of Internet-based systems for collecting patient-reported outcomes
Symptoms, supportive care needs, and function in cancer patients
Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice
PatientViewpoint
Concordance of cancer patients’ function, symptoms, and supportive care needs
Relevant content for a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire for use in oncology clinical practice
Needs assessments can identify scores on HRQOL questionnaires that represent problems for patients
Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 in clinical practice for patient management
Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs)
Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) aims to improve care quality and patient outcomes by providing information that patients, clinicians, and family members need regarding treatment alternatives, and emphasizing patient input to inform the research process. PCOR capitalizes on available data sources and generates new evidence to provide timely and relevant information and can be conducted using prospective data collection, disease registrie…
Cancer patients’ function, symptoms and supportive care needs
Identifying changes in scores on the EORTC-QLQ-C30 representing a change in patients’ supportive care needs
International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the draft European Medicines Agency reflection paper on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies
Communicating patient-reported outcome scores using graphic formats
Presenting comparative study PRO results to clinicians and researchers
Graphic formats for presenting PRO data differ in how accurately they are interpreted and how clear they are perceived to be. These findings will inform the development of best practices for optimally reporting PRO findings
In proportion
Making a picture worth a thousand numbers
A PRO-cision Medicine Methods Toolkit to Address the Challenges of Personalizing Cancer Care Using Patient-Reported Outcomes
Patients are increasingly being asked to complete standardized, validated questionnaires with regard to their symptoms, functioning, and well-being [ie, patient-reported outcomes (PROs)] as part of routine care. These PROs can be used to inform patients’ care and management, which we refer to as “PRO-cision Medicine.” For PRO-cision Medicine to be most effective, clinicians and patients need to be able to understand what the PRO scores mean and h…
Interpreting and Acting on PRO Results in Clinical Practice
INTRODUCTION: We have used several methods to aid in the interpretation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, and to suggest recommendations for acting on them, both within the PatientViewpoint system and in work done since. METHODS FOR INTERPRETING PRO SCORES: For identifying possibly concerning change scores, PatientViewpoint uses questionnaires' minimally important differences or score worsening >1⁄2 SD. For poor scores in absolute terms, …
A PRO-cision medicine intervention to personalize cancer care using patient-reported outcomes
Truth and dare
This study does not support the hypothesis that patients systematically bias their PROM responses if they know that clinicians will see their results. These findings support using PROMs in clinical practice as a valid mechanism to promote patient-centered care
Medicine (23 works) · Cancer survivorship and care (17 works) · Nursing (14 works) · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 works) · Internal Medicine (12 works) · Psychology (11 works) · Public health (10 works) · Quality of Life Research (10 works) · Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (8 works) · Computer Science (8 works)