DANIEL L KENT
Biographic Data
| ID | 5546141 |
|---|---|
| NAME | DANIEL L KENT |
| GIVEN NAMES | DANIEL L |
| FAMILY NAME | KENT |
| SIGNATURE | KENT D L |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1993 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1994 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Toward a Peer Review Process for Medical Decision Analysis Models
This paper presents a framework for a peer review process for medical decision analysis models. This framework is based on the collective experience of the members of the Inter-PORT Decision Modeling work group, a team of decision analysis experts comprising members from each of the Patient Outcomes Research Teams (PORTs), sponsored by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Important general principles of correct model structure include …
Variation in the Rate of Cervical Spine Surgery in Washington State
Lack of consensus about the treatment of low back pain is reflected by wide regional variations in lumbar spine surgery rates. Neck pain may be as common as low back pain, but there has been no similar evaluation of regional variation for the surgical treatment of neck pain. This report examines the geographic variation and temporal trends in the rate of cervical spine surgery in Washington state from 1986 through 1989. Using diagnosis and proced…
No prominent works on this page.
Variation in the Rate of Cervical Spine Surgery in Washington State
Lack of consensus about the treatment of low back pain is reflected by wide regional variations in lumbar spine surgery rates. Neck pain may be as common as low back pain, but there has been no similar evaluation of regional variation for the surgical treatment of neck pain. This report examines the geographic variation and temporal trends in the rate of cervical spine surgery in Washington state from 1986 through 1989. Using diagnosis and proced…
Toward a Peer Review Process for Medical Decision Analysis Models
This paper presents a framework for a peer review process for medical decision analysis models. This framework is based on the collective experience of the members of the Inter-PORT Decision Modeling work group, a team of decision analysis experts comprising members from each of the Patient Outcomes Research Teams (PORTs), sponsored by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Important general principles of correct model structure include …
Agency (philosophy) (1 work) · Cervical spine (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Decision analysis (1 work) · Decision model (1 work) · Economic and Environmental Valuation (1 work) · Engineering (1 work) · Geographic variation (1 work) · Health care (1 work) · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 work)