Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rosemary Pattenden

Biographic Data

ID5578935
NAMERosemary Pattenden
GIVEN NAMESRosemary
FAMILY NAMEPattenden
SIGNATUREPATTENDEN R
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of East Anglia
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS24
TOTAL CITATIONS2
WORKS AS AUTHOR24
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1980
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2012
H-INDEX1
  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2012

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2012

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2011

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2011

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2011

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2011

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2010

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2010

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2010

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2010

  • Choice, Privacy and Publicly Funded Legal Advice at Police Stations

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden, Layla Skinns•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•2010

    Section 58 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 confers on all suspects held in police custody a right to consult a solicitor in private. The free legal advice which suspects arrested for certain minor offences can request is restricted to telephone advice from a call‐centre operated by CDS Direct. It is lawful for the Legal Services Commission to restrict the delivery of legal advice in this way. Empirical research, however, reveals that…

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2009

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2009

  • Case Commentaries

    Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2009

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2009

  • Authenticating ‘Things’ in English Law

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2008

    This article explores the true nature of authentication of tangible evidence in English law and kindred jurisdictions. It first identifies general principles governing the respective roles of judge and jury in the authentication of tangible evidence embedded within the case law of England and Wales. Those principles are then compared and contrasted to the rules governing authentication of evidence under the US Federal Rules of Evidence. Finally, …

  • Litigation Privilege and Expert Opinion Evidence

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2000

  • Using the Overtly Non-Incriminating Statement to Incriminate

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•1999

  • Self-Incrimination and the Threat of Prosecution under Foreign Law

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•1998

  • Silence

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•1998

  • Explaining a ‘Reasonable Doubt’ to Juries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•1998

  • Conceptual Versus Pragmatic Approaches to Hearsay

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•1993

    AJs moral evidence they may be very cogent; yet does the law, more rigid and inflexible, resist the weight of such moral evidence, although, in the ordinav transactions of life, common sense and experience might possibly yield to it

  • Informal Judicial Admissions of Criminal Activity

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•International and Comparative Law…•1983

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • The Exclusion of Unfairly Obtained Evidence in England, Canada and Australia

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•International and Comparative Law…•1980•Cited by: 2

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • The Exclusion of Unfairly Obtained Evidence in England, Canada and Australia

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•International and Comparative Law…•1980•Cited by: 2

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • The Exclusion of Unfairly Obtained Evidence in England, Canada and Australia

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•International and Comparative Law…•1980•Cited by: 2

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Informal Judicial Admissions of Criminal Activity

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•International and Comparative Law…•1983

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Conceptual Versus Pragmatic Approaches to Hearsay

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•1993

    AJs moral evidence they may be very cogent; yet does the law, more rigid and inflexible, resist the weight of such moral evidence, although, in the ordinav transactions of life, common sense and experience might possibly yield to it

  • Self-Incrimination and the Threat of Prosecution under Foreign Law

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•1998

  • Silence

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•1998

  • Explaining a ‘Reasonable Doubt’ to Juries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•1998

  • Using the Overtly Non-Incriminating Statement to Incriminate

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•1999

  • Litigation Privilege and Expert Opinion Evidence

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2000

  • Authenticating ‘Things’ in English Law

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2008

    This article explores the true nature of authentication of tangible evidence in English law and kindred jurisdictions. It first identifies general principles governing the respective roles of judge and jury in the authentication of tangible evidence embedded within the case law of England and Wales. Those principles are then compared and contrasted to the rules governing authentication of evidence under the US Federal Rules of Evidence. Finally, …

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2009

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2009

  • Case Commentaries

    Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2009

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2009

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2010

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2010

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2010

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2010

  • Choice, Privacy and Publicly Funded Legal Advice at Police Stations

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden, Layla Skinns•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•2010

    Section 58 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 confers on all suspects held in police custody a right to consult a solicitor in private. The free legal advice which suspects arrested for certain minor offences can request is restricted to telephone advice from a call‐centre operated by CDS Direct. It is lawful for the Legal Services Commission to restrict the delivery of legal advice in this way. Empirical research, however, reveals that…

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2011

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2011

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2011

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2011

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2012

  • Case Commentaries

    Open Access•Rosemary Pattenden•ARTICLE•The International Journal of…•2012

Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies (14 works) · Legal case studies and regulations (14 works) · Legal Cases and Commentary (14 works) · Political science (10 works) · Psychology (9 works) · Law (8 works) · Computer Science (7 works) · Philosophy (7 works) · Philosophy (7 works) · Law (6 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae