Tamas Gyorfi
Biographic Data
| ID | 5579002 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Tamas Gyorfi |
| GIVEN NAMES | Tamas |
| FAMILY NAME | Gyorfi |
| SIGNATURE | GYORFI T |
| AFFILIATIONS | Ford (Germany) |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-6639-5285 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
The legitimacy of the European human rights regime – a view from the United Kingdom
The purpose of the present article is threefold. First, my ambition is to improve the analytical framework that is used to assess the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights. The Court’s authority can neither be established nor refuted by a single master-argument. Instead, what we need is a careful balancing exercise and this piece aims to set out the main elements of the justificatory equation. Second, using this framework, I intend to …
Why Is the Equal Merit Principle (Almost) Straightforwardly Wrong
This article challenges the ‘Equal Merit Principle’, introduced to the judicial appointment process by the Crime and Courts Act 2013. The author argues that this principle does not take diversity seriously enough and none of its possible justifications stand up to close scrutiny. The author also claims that the doctrine that judges should be appointed solely on the basis of merit is either wrong, for the very same reasons as the Equal Merit Princ…
No prominent works on this page.
Why Is the Equal Merit Principle (Almost) Straightforwardly Wrong
This article challenges the ‘Equal Merit Principle’, introduced to the judicial appointment process by the Crime and Courts Act 2013. The author argues that this principle does not take diversity seriously enough and none of its possible justifications stand up to close scrutiny. The author also claims that the doctrine that judges should be appointed solely on the basis of merit is either wrong, for the very same reasons as the Equal Merit Princ…
The legitimacy of the European human rights regime – a view from the United Kingdom
The purpose of the present article is threefold. First, my ambition is to improve the analytical framework that is used to assess the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights. The Court’s authority can neither be established nor refuted by a single master-argument. Instead, what we need is a careful balancing exercise and this piece aims to set out the main elements of the justificatory equation. Second, using this framework, I intend to …
Computer Science (2 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law and economics (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Argument (complex analysis (1 work) · Criticism (1 work) · Diversity (politics) (1 work) · Doctrine (1 work)