Lusina Ho
Biographic Data
| ID | 5579153 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Lusina Ho |
| GIVEN NAMES | Lusina |
| FAMILY NAME | Ho |
| SIGNATURE | HO L |
| AFFILIATIONS | Feed Control (Norway) |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2012 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Knowing Receipt, Equitable Proprietary Rights, and Duties of Due Administration
In Byers v Saudi National Bank (2023) the Supreme Court held that a claimant in knowing receipt must have had a ‘continuing equitable proprietary interest’ in the property received by the defendant. Such an interest is commonly understood to include a right to benefit from the property, yet successful claims in knowing receipt have often been made by claimants without such a right. We therefore propose a different interpretation of all the knowin…
Intestacy and Inequality Under China’s Revised Succession Law
This Article assesses how Chinese intestacy laws augment and redress wealth inequality. In 2021, China’s first civil code took effect, reforming, among other things, the decades-old Succession Law. Focusing on the Intestacy Rules within the Revised Succession Law, we show how the prioritization of testamentary freedom and intrafamilial wealth preservation undercuts the Chinese Communist Party’s goal of curbing inequality, especially as espoused u…
Reluctant Bedfellows
The case note examines the recent decision of the H ong K ong C ourt of F inal A ppeal in T hanakharn K asikorn T hai C hamkat ( M ahachon) v A kai H oldings L td , where L ord N euberger of A bbotsbury adopted the test of irrationality in determining whether a defaulting agent had apparent authority to act on behalf of his principal to confer benefits on a third party. His L ordship further held that a concurrent claim in knowing receipt arose a…
No prominent works on this page.
Reluctant Bedfellows
The case note examines the recent decision of the H ong K ong C ourt of F inal A ppeal in T hanakharn K asikorn T hai C hamkat ( M ahachon) v A kai H oldings L td , where L ord N euberger of A bbotsbury adopted the test of irrationality in determining whether a defaulting agent had apparent authority to act on behalf of his principal to confer benefits on a third party. His L ordship further held that a concurrent claim in knowing receipt arose a…
Intestacy and Inequality Under China’s Revised Succession Law
This Article assesses how Chinese intestacy laws augment and redress wealth inequality. In 2021, China’s first civil code took effect, reforming, among other things, the decades-old Succession Law. Focusing on the Intestacy Rules within the Revised Succession Law, we show how the prioritization of testamentary freedom and intrafamilial wealth preservation undercuts the Chinese Communist Party’s goal of curbing inequality, especially as espoused u…
Knowing Receipt, Equitable Proprietary Rights, and Duties of Due Administration
In Byers v Saudi National Bank (2023) the Supreme Court held that a claimant in knowing receipt must have had a ‘continuing equitable proprietary interest’ in the property received by the defendant. Such an interest is commonly understood to include a right to benefit from the property, yet successful claims in knowing receipt have often been made by claimants without such a right. We therefore propose a different interpretation of all the knowin…
Law (2 works) · Law and economics (2 works) · Legal principles and applications (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Receipt (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Accounting (1 work) · Accounting (1 work) · Administration (probate law) (1 work) · Business (1 work)