Eleni Katsampouka
Biographic Data
| ID | 5579260 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Eleni Katsampouka |
| GIVEN NAMES | Eleni |
| FAMILY NAME | Katsampouka |
| SIGNATURE | KATSAMPOUKA E |
| AFFILIATIONS | Software Training and Development Centre |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7019-8847 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Tort Liability for Contractual Liability
This article addresses the doctrine of remoteness in tort in light of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Armstead v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. Armstead further attenuates an already weak control on tortious liability. In outline, it does so in two ways: first, by establishing that contractual liabilities incurred as a result of tortiously caused property damage comprise non-remote damage provided that those liabilities represen…
The Omissions Doctrine after Tindall v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police
In tort law, liability is generally not imposed for failing to confer a benefit on another person. This is commonly referred to as the omissions doctrine. In Tindall v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police , the UK Supreme Court elucidated the scope of this doctrine. Significantly, it endorsed for the first time the interference principle which provides that a duty of care arises where it is reasonably foreseeable that the defendant's interfere…
Punitive Damages and the Place of Punishment in Private Law
It has long been orthodoxy that punitive damages, because they are awarded in order to punish, are an anomalous remedy. So entrenched is this understanding that it has never been seriously challenged. However, even apparent truisms about the law should be questioned and, accordingly, this article offers a rival account. It contends that the deeply ingrained view that punitive damages are an aberration is a half‐truth because several other remedia…
No prominent works on this page.
Punitive Damages and the Place of Punishment in Private Law
It has long been orthodoxy that punitive damages, because they are awarded in order to punish, are an anomalous remedy. So entrenched is this understanding that it has never been seriously challenged. However, even apparent truisms about the law should be questioned and, accordingly, this article offers a rival account. It contends that the deeply ingrained view that punitive damages are an aberration is a half‐truth because several other remedia…
Tort Liability for Contractual Liability
This article addresses the doctrine of remoteness in tort in light of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Armstead v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. Armstead further attenuates an already weak control on tortious liability. In outline, it does so in two ways: first, by establishing that contractual liabilities incurred as a result of tortiously caused property damage comprise non-remote damage provided that those liabilities represen…
The Omissions Doctrine after Tindall v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police
In tort law, liability is generally not imposed for failing to confer a benefit on another person. This is commonly referred to as the omissions doctrine. In Tindall v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police , the UK Supreme Court elucidated the scope of this doctrine. Significantly, it endorsed for the first time the interference principle which provides that a duty of care arises where it is reasonably foreseeable that the defendant's interfere…
Legal principles and applications (3 works) · Doctrine (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Business (1 work) · Criminal Law and Evidence (1 work) · Damages (1 work) · Finance (1 work) · Finance (1 work)