Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Daniel Matthews

Biographic Data

ID5579302
NAMEDaniel Matthews
GIVEN NAMESDaniel
FAMILY NAMEMatthews
SIGNATUREMATTHEWS D
AFFILIATIONSThe University of Hong Kong, China
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS9
TOTAL CITATIONS16
AUTHOR COUNT9
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2012
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX2
  • Sovereignty and the Persistence of the Aesthetic

    Open Access•Illan Rua Wall, Illan Wall et al.•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•2024•Cited by: 1

    British constitutional thought tends to understand sovereignty in legalistic terms, with the concept often equated with the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. As Loughlin and Tierney have recently argued, this approach obscures the political considerations which undergird the legal precept. In this article we argue that this approach misses a third, and essentially important, dimension to sovereignty. Law, politics and aesthetics all play equ…

  • Sovereignty in the Anthropocene

    David Matthews, Daniel Matthews et al.•ARTICLE•Griffith Law Review•2022

    This article is an edited version of a conversation animated by Daniel Matthews’ recent monograph Earthbound: The Aesthetics of Sovereignty in the Anthropocene. We discuss the impetus and context for the book, its contribution to an emergent literature on law and the Anthropocene, and its commentary on the continued relevance of humanistic approaches to law and politics. The conversation traverses a range of concerns raised by Earthbound, such as…

  • Earthbound: The Aesthetics of Sovereignty in the Anthropocene

    David Matthews, Daniel Matthews•BOOK•Earthbound•2021•Cited by: 2

    Examines how sovereignty inures us from the challenges associated with the climate crisis Engages with the work of Bruno Latour, Simone Weil, Clive Hamilton, Jacques Rancière, Donna Haraway, Judith Butler, Giorgio Agamben, Stuart Elden and others Presents an innovative theory of sovereignty’s ‘aesthetics’ that contributes to contemporary debates in legal and political theory Outlines the key challenges for law and politics provoked by the Anthrop…

  • Laws for the Anthropocene: Orientations, Encounters, Imaginaries

    Open Access•Kathleen Birrell, David Matthews et al.•ARTICLE•Law and Critique•2020

  • Re-storying Laws for the Anthropocene: Rights, Obligations and an Ethics of Encounter

    Open Access•Kathleen Birrell, David Matthews et al.•ARTICLE•Law and Critique•2020•Cited by: 10•References: 19

  • From Global to Anthropocenic Assemblages: Re‐Thinking Territory, Authority and Rights in the New Climatic Regime

    Open Access•David Matthews, Daniel Matthews•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•2019

    In a widely read study, Saskia Sassen uses the territory, authority, rights (TAR) framework in order to analyse the transformation of social life in the West from ‘medieval’ to ‘global’ assemblages. In the context of rapid, planetary climatic change – with many claiming that we have entered a new and climatically uncertain epoch known as the Anthropocene – does the TAR framework provide the relevant conceptual resources required to understand the…

  • Narrative, Space and Atmosphere: A Nomospheric Inquiry into Hong Kong’s Pro-democracy ‘Umbrella Movement’

    Open Access•David Matthews, Daniel Matthews•ARTICLE•Social & Legal Studies•2016•Cited by: 3•References: 14

    Since the financial crash of 2008, the strategy of occupation has been widely deployed as a means of expressing and mobilizing political dissent. Within legal studies, responses to this mode of protest have remained wedded to a statist perspective that fails to assess the normative commitments immanent to occupations themselves. Rather than examining the strategy of occupation through a legalistic lens, this article approaches a recent occupation…

  • The Question of Political Responsibility and the Foundation of the National Transitional Council for Libya

    Open Access•David Matthews, Daniel Matthews•ARTICLE•Law and Critique•2012•References: 2

  • Theory engaged: Perspectives of discontent

    Open Access•David Matthews, Daniel Matthews et al.•ARTICLE•Law and Critique•2012

  • Re-storying Laws for the Anthropocene: Rights, Obligations and an Ethics of Encounter

    Open Access•Kathleen Birrell, David Matthews et al.•ARTICLE•Law and Critique•2020•Cited by: 10•References: 19

  • Narrative, Space and Atmosphere: A Nomospheric Inquiry into Hong Kong’s Pro-democracy ‘Umbrella Movement’

    Open Access•David Matthews, Daniel Matthews•ARTICLE•Social & Legal Studies•2016•Cited by: 3•References: 14

    Since the financial crash of 2008, the strategy of occupation has been widely deployed as a means of expressing and mobilizing political dissent. Within legal studies, responses to this mode of protest have remained wedded to a statist perspective that fails to assess the normative commitments immanent to occupations themselves. Rather than examining the strategy of occupation through a legalistic lens, this article approaches a recent occupation…

  • Earthbound: The Aesthetics of Sovereignty in the Anthropocene

    David Matthews, Daniel Matthews•BOOK•Earthbound•2021•Cited by: 2

    Examines how sovereignty inures us from the challenges associated with the climate crisis Engages with the work of Bruno Latour, Simone Weil, Clive Hamilton, Jacques Rancière, Donna Haraway, Judith Butler, Giorgio Agamben, Stuart Elden and others Presents an innovative theory of sovereignty’s ‘aesthetics’ that contributes to contemporary debates in legal and political theory Outlines the key challenges for law and politics provoked by the Anthrop…

  • Sovereignty and the Persistence of the Aesthetic

    Open Access•Illan Rua Wall, Illan Wall et al.•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•2024•Cited by: 1

    British constitutional thought tends to understand sovereignty in legalistic terms, with the concept often equated with the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. As Loughlin and Tierney have recently argued, this approach obscures the political considerations which undergird the legal precept. In this article we argue that this approach misses a third, and essentially important, dimension to sovereignty. Law, politics and aesthetics all play equ…

  • The Question of Political Responsibility and the Foundation of the National Transitional Council for Libya

    Open Access•David Matthews, Daniel Matthews•ARTICLE•Law and Critique•2012•References: 2

  • Theory engaged: Perspectives of discontent

    Open Access•David Matthews, Daniel Matthews et al.•ARTICLE•Law and Critique•2012

  • Narrative, Space and Atmosphere: A Nomospheric Inquiry into Hong Kong’s Pro-democracy ‘Umbrella Movement’

    Open Access•David Matthews, Daniel Matthews•ARTICLE•Social & Legal Studies•2016•Cited by: 3•References: 14

    Since the financial crash of 2008, the strategy of occupation has been widely deployed as a means of expressing and mobilizing political dissent. Within legal studies, responses to this mode of protest have remained wedded to a statist perspective that fails to assess the normative commitments immanent to occupations themselves. Rather than examining the strategy of occupation through a legalistic lens, this article approaches a recent occupation…

  • From Global to Anthropocenic Assemblages: Re‐Thinking Territory, Authority and Rights in the New Climatic Regime

    Open Access•David Matthews, Daniel Matthews•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•2019

    In a widely read study, Saskia Sassen uses the territory, authority, rights (TAR) framework in order to analyse the transformation of social life in the West from ‘medieval’ to ‘global’ assemblages. In the context of rapid, planetary climatic change – with many claiming that we have entered a new and climatically uncertain epoch known as the Anthropocene – does the TAR framework provide the relevant conceptual resources required to understand the…

  • Laws for the Anthropocene: Orientations, Encounters, Imaginaries

    Open Access•Kathleen Birrell, David Matthews et al.•ARTICLE•Law and Critique•2020

  • Re-storying Laws for the Anthropocene: Rights, Obligations and an Ethics of Encounter

    Open Access•Kathleen Birrell, David Matthews et al.•ARTICLE•Law and Critique•2020•Cited by: 10•References: 19

  • Earthbound: The Aesthetics of Sovereignty in the Anthropocene

    David Matthews, Daniel Matthews•BOOK•Earthbound•2021•Cited by: 2

    Examines how sovereignty inures us from the challenges associated with the climate crisis Engages with the work of Bruno Latour, Simone Weil, Clive Hamilton, Jacques Rancière, Donna Haraway, Judith Butler, Giorgio Agamben, Stuart Elden and others Presents an innovative theory of sovereignty’s ‘aesthetics’ that contributes to contemporary debates in legal and political theory Outlines the key challenges for law and politics provoked by the Anthrop…

  • Sovereignty in the Anthropocene

    David Matthews, Daniel Matthews et al.•ARTICLE•Griffith Law Review•2022

    This article is an edited version of a conversation animated by Daniel Matthews’ recent monograph Earthbound: The Aesthetics of Sovereignty in the Anthropocene. We discuss the impetus and context for the book, its contribution to an emergent literature on law and the Anthropocene, and its commentary on the continued relevance of humanistic approaches to law and politics. The conversation traverses a range of concerns raised by Earthbound, such as…

  • Sovereignty and the Persistence of the Aesthetic

    Open Access•Illan Rua Wall, Illan Wall et al.•ARTICLE•Modern Law Review•2024•Cited by: 1

    British constitutional thought tends to understand sovereignty in legalistic terms, with the concept often equated with the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. As Loughlin and Tierney have recently argued, this approach obscures the political considerations which undergird the legal precept. In this article we argue that this approach misses a third, and essentially important, dimension to sovereignty. Law, politics and aesthetics all play equ…

Political science (8 works) · Law (7 works) · Sociology (7 works) · Law (5 works) · Politics (5 works) · Anthropocene (4 works) · Environmental ethics (4 works) · Environmental law and policy (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae