Kate Greasley
Biographic Data
| ID | 5579332 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Kate Greasley |
| GIVEN NAMES | Kate |
| FAMILY NAME | Greasley |
| SIGNATURE | GREASLEY K |
| AFFILIATIONS | New College |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-1071-7094 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2010 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Mistaken Consent and Socially Reasonable Beliefs
This article examines the philosophical underpinnings of reasonable belief about consent to sexual activity, in the context of rape liability. I argue that scholars are correct to underscore the centrality of social conventions around consent in every assessment of reasonable belief. Despite this, I argue that what makes for a reasonable belief by A that B consents to sexual activity is not merely determined by social conventions. Against one int…
Introduction by the Guest Editors
An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button
Taking Abortion Rights Seriously
In Whole Woman's Health v Hellerstedt the Supreme Court of the United States passed down its most important decision on abortion for just under a decade. By a majority of 5‐3, the Court ruled that two provisions in a Texas law regulating abortion on grounds of women's health were constitutionally invalid, placing a ‘substantial obstacle’ in the way of women seeking to exercise their right to abortion. This comment delineates the key ways in which…
A Negligent Blow to Children at Risk
In MAK and RK v United Kingdom the European Court found that the absence of a common law duty of care owed to parents by doctors falsely suspecting them of their child's abuse violated the European Convention on Human Rights. This appears to be so even where the suspicion is a reasonable and blameless one to make, all things considered. In such circumstances, the court's decision to find that a parents' Convention rights had been unjustifiably in…
Taking Abortion Rights Seriously
In Whole Woman's Health v Hellerstedt the Supreme Court of the United States passed down its most important decision on abortion for just under a decade. By a majority of 5‐3, the Court ruled that two provisions in a Texas law regulating abortion on grounds of women's health were constitutionally invalid, placing a ‘substantial obstacle’ in the way of women seeking to exercise their right to abortion. This comment delineates the key ways in which…
A Negligent Blow to Children at Risk
In MAK and RK v United Kingdom the European Court found that the absence of a common law duty of care owed to parents by doctors falsely suspecting them of their child's abuse violated the European Convention on Human Rights. This appears to be so even where the suspicion is a reasonable and blameless one to make, all things considered. In such circumstances, the court's decision to find that a parents' Convention rights had been unjustifiably in…
Taking Abortion Rights Seriously
In Whole Woman's Health v Hellerstedt the Supreme Court of the United States passed down its most important decision on abortion for just under a decade. By a majority of 5‐3, the Court ruled that two provisions in a Texas law regulating abortion on grounds of women's health were constitutionally invalid, placing a ‘substantial obstacle’ in the way of women seeking to exercise their right to abortion. This comment delineates the key ways in which…
Introduction by the Guest Editors
An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button
Mistaken Consent and Socially Reasonable Beliefs
This article examines the philosophical underpinnings of reasonable belief about consent to sexual activity, in the context of rape liability. I argue that scholars are correct to underscore the centrality of social conventions around consent in every assessment of reasonable belief. Despite this, I argue that what makes for a reasonable belief by A that B consents to sexual activity is not merely determined by social conventions. Against one int…
Human rights (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Abortion (1 work) · Abortion law (1 work) · American History and Culture (1 work) · Business (1 work) · Centrality (1 work) · Common law (1 work) · Compensation (psychology) (1 work)