Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Stephanie A Shwiff

Biographic Data

ID5589256
NAMEStephanie A Shwiff
GIVEN NAMESStephanie A
FAMILY NAMEShwiff
SIGNATURESHWIFF S A
AFFILIATIONSNational Wildlife Research Center
ORCID0000-0001-9065-9017
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS0
AUTHOR COUNT8
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2002
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX0
  • Evasive invasive species: Bioeconomic modelling of adaptive wild pigs

    Open Access•Katherine R Barkley, Seong Do Yun et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2025

  • Optimal R&D investment in the management of invasive species

    Open Access•William Haden Chomphosy, Dale T Manning et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2023

  • Social identity and acceptability of wild pig ( Sus scrofa ) control actions: A case study of Texas hunters

    Lauren M Jaebker, Tara L Teel et al.•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2021

    Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) pose significant challenges to wildlife managers. This research explored Texas hunters’ acceptability of wild pig control actions, and whether acceptability varied according to hunters’ affiliation with four different categories of natural resource organizations as an indicator of social identity. Results of a survey (n = 37,317) revealed that most hunters were accepting of all control actions except toxicants and non-letha…

  • Social media as a window into human-wildlife interactions and zoonotic disease risk: An examination of wild pig hunting videos on YouTube

    Hailey E Ellis, Hailey E McLean et al.•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2021

    Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) damage agriculture and the environment, as well as transmit diseases to animals and people. Hunters are particularly vulnerable to zoonotic disease risks when harvesting wild pigs. Management agencies have endeavored to inform the public about disease risks associated with wild pigs and best practices for mitigating such risks. However, the extent that this guidance has reached hunters and influenced their practices is uncl…

  • Bioeconomic analysis of herpetofauna road-kills in a Florida state park

    Open Access•Stephanie A Shwiff, Henry T Smith et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2007

  • Ex post economic analysis of reproduction-monitoring and predator-removal variables associated with protection of the endangered California least tern

    Open Access•Stephanie A Shwiff, Ray T Sterner et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2005

  • An economic assessment of the potential for predator management to benefit Puerto Rican parrots

    Open Access•Richard M Engeman, Stephanie A Shwiff et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2003

  • An economic analysis of predator removal approaches for protecting marine turtle nests at Hobe Sound National Wildlife Refuge

    Open Access•Richard M Engeman, Stephanie A Shwiff et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2002

No prominent works on this page.

  • An economic analysis of predator removal approaches for protecting marine turtle nests at Hobe Sound National Wildlife Refuge

    Open Access•Richard M Engeman, Stephanie A Shwiff et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2002

  • An economic assessment of the potential for predator management to benefit Puerto Rican parrots

    Open Access•Richard M Engeman, Stephanie A Shwiff et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2003

  • Ex post economic analysis of reproduction-monitoring and predator-removal variables associated with protection of the endangered California least tern

    Open Access•Stephanie A Shwiff, Ray T Sterner et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2005

  • Bioeconomic analysis of herpetofauna road-kills in a Florida state park

    Open Access•Stephanie A Shwiff, Henry T Smith et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2007

  • Social identity and acceptability of wild pig ( Sus scrofa ) control actions: A case study of Texas hunters

    Lauren M Jaebker, Tara L Teel et al.•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2021

    Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) pose significant challenges to wildlife managers. This research explored Texas hunters’ acceptability of wild pig control actions, and whether acceptability varied according to hunters’ affiliation with four different categories of natural resource organizations as an indicator of social identity. Results of a survey (n = 37,317) revealed that most hunters were accepting of all control actions except toxicants and non-letha…

  • Social media as a window into human-wildlife interactions and zoonotic disease risk: An examination of wild pig hunting videos on YouTube

    Hailey E Ellis, Hailey E McLean et al.•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2021

    Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) damage agriculture and the environment, as well as transmit diseases to animals and people. Hunters are particularly vulnerable to zoonotic disease risks when harvesting wild pigs. Management agencies have endeavored to inform the public about disease risks associated with wild pigs and best practices for mitigating such risks. However, the extent that this guidance has reached hunters and influenced their practices is uncl…

  • Optimal R&D investment in the management of invasive species

    Open Access•William Haden Chomphosy, Dale T Manning et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2023

  • Evasive invasive species: Bioeconomic modelling of adaptive wild pigs

    Open Access•Katherine R Barkley, Seong Do Yun et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2025

Biology (7 works) · Ecology (6 works) · Geography (5 works) · Wildlife (4 works) · Business (3 works) · Endangered species (3 works) · Fishery (3 works) · Predation (3 works) · Predator (3 works) · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae