Halford Ross Ryan
Biographic Data
| ID | 5595745 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Halford Ross Ryan |
| GIVEN NAMES | Halford Ross |
| FAMILY NAME | Ryan |
| SIGNATURE | RYAN H R |
| AFFILIATIONS | Washington and Lee University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 18 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1979 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1996 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
The White House Speaks
Journal Article The White House Speaks: Presidential Leadership as Persuasion. By Craig Allen Smith and Kathy B. Smith. (Westport: Praeger, 1994. xviii, 263 pp. $55.00, ISBN 0-275-94394-1.) Get access Halford Ryan Halford Ryan Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of American History, Volume 82, Issue 4, March 1996, Pages 1655–1656, https://doi.org/10.23…
Oratorical Encounters
Journal Article Oratorical Encounters: Selected Studies and Sources of Twentieth-Century Political Accusations and Apologies. Ed. by Halford Ross Ryan. (Westport: Greenwood, 1988. vssïi + 329 pp. $39.95.) Get access Thomas W. Ryley Thomas W. Ryley New York City Technical College, City University of New York Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of American History, Volume 77, Issue 4, March 1991, Pages 1…
Kategoria and apologia
This essay demonstrates that a speech of accusation motivates a response in a speech of defense and that both should be treated as a rhetorical speech set. The author uses Fisher's motives of affirmation and purification, Bitzer's conception of the rhetorical situation, and the Classical schema of stasis to explicate the speech set. He offers Pope Leo X vs. Martin Luther as an illustrative example
Roosevelt's fourth inaugural address
The author clarifies the confusion about the authorship of FDR's Fourth Inaugural, and studies the speech drafts to determine which thoughts were FDR's and which were contributed by speech writers
Roosevelt's first inaugural
This study examines three rhetorical techniques that Franklin D. Roosevelt used in his “First Inaugural Address” to announce and implement his New Deal. The various speech drafts examined reveal that FDR himself purposefully used military metaphor, the scapegoat, and the carrot‐and‐stick approach to accomplish certain persuasive goals
Kategoria and apologia
This essay demonstrates that a speech of accusation motivates a response in a speech of defense and that both should be treated as a rhetorical speech set. The author uses Fisher's motives of affirmation and purification, Bitzer's conception of the rhetorical situation, and the Classical schema of stasis to explicate the speech set. He offers Pope Leo X vs. Martin Luther as an illustrative example
Oratorical Encounters
Journal Article Oratorical Encounters: Selected Studies and Sources of Twentieth-Century Political Accusations and Apologies. Ed. by Halford Ross Ryan. (Westport: Greenwood, 1988. vssïi + 329 pp. $39.95.) Get access Thomas W. Ryley Thomas W. Ryley New York City Technical College, City University of New York Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of American History, Volume 77, Issue 4, March 1991, Pages 1…
Roosevelt's first inaugural
This study examines three rhetorical techniques that Franklin D. Roosevelt used in his “First Inaugural Address” to announce and implement his New Deal. The various speech drafts examined reveal that FDR himself purposefully used military metaphor, the scapegoat, and the carrot‐and‐stick approach to accomplish certain persuasive goals
Roosevelt's first inaugural
This study examines three rhetorical techniques that Franklin D. Roosevelt used in his “First Inaugural Address” to announce and implement his New Deal. The various speech drafts examined reveal that FDR himself purposefully used military metaphor, the scapegoat, and the carrot‐and‐stick approach to accomplish certain persuasive goals
Roosevelt's fourth inaugural address
The author clarifies the confusion about the authorship of FDR's Fourth Inaugural, and studies the speech drafts to determine which thoughts were FDR's and which were contributed by speech writers
Kategoria and apologia
This essay demonstrates that a speech of accusation motivates a response in a speech of defense and that both should be treated as a rhetorical speech set. The author uses Fisher's motives of affirmation and purification, Bitzer's conception of the rhetorical situation, and the Classical schema of stasis to explicate the speech set. He offers Pope Leo X vs. Martin Luther as an illustrative example
Oratorical Encounters
Journal Article Oratorical Encounters: Selected Studies and Sources of Twentieth-Century Political Accusations and Apologies. Ed. by Halford Ross Ryan. (Westport: Greenwood, 1988. vssïi + 329 pp. $39.95.) Get access Thomas W. Ryley Thomas W. Ryley New York City Technical College, City University of New York Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of American History, Volume 77, Issue 4, March 1991, Pages 1…
The White House Speaks
Journal Article The White House Speaks: Presidential Leadership as Persuasion. By Craig Allen Smith and Kathy B. Smith. (Westport: Praeger, 1994. xviii, 263 pp. $55.00, ISBN 0-275-94394-1.) Get access Halford Ryan Halford Ryan Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of American History, Volume 82, Issue 4, March 1996, Pages 1655–1656, https://doi.org/10.23…
Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Linguistics (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Academic Freedom and Politics (2 works) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 works) · History (2 works) · History (2 works) · Law (2 works)