Marsha L Vanderford
Biographic Data
| ID | 5595869 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Marsha L Vanderford |
| GIVEN NAMES | Marsha L |
| FAMILY NAME | Vanderford |
| SIGNATURE | VANDERFORD M L |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of South Florida |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 11 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1989 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
How Does WHO’s Covid-19 Response Build and Challenge the Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) Evidence-Base
includes the only official WHO evidence-based recommendations for RCCE practice, based on meta-syntheses of relevant literature through 2015. This analysis considered whether RCCE interventions undertaken during COVID-19 added strength to previous recommendations, filled evidence gaps, contradicted or added nuance to endorsements and conclusions, or pointed RCCE in new directions for future practice
Her feminism doesn't fit
Vilification and social movements
Vilification is a rhetorical strategy that discredits adversaries as ungenuine and malevolent advocates. The strategy is pervasive in the rhetoric of pro‐life and pro‐choice movements in Minnesota between 1973 and 1980. Both movements characterize their opponents as elite conspiracies whose influence is based upon misuse of powerful agencies and whose motives are tyrannous and unjust. Vilification strategies construct the enemy as simultaneously …
Vilification and social movements
Vilification is a rhetorical strategy that discredits adversaries as ungenuine and malevolent advocates. The strategy is pervasive in the rhetoric of pro‐life and pro‐choice movements in Minnesota between 1973 and 1980. Both movements characterize their opponents as elite conspiracies whose influence is based upon misuse of powerful agencies and whose motives are tyrannous and unjust. Vilification strategies construct the enemy as simultaneously …
Vilification and social movements
Vilification is a rhetorical strategy that discredits adversaries as ungenuine and malevolent advocates. The strategy is pervasive in the rhetoric of pro‐life and pro‐choice movements in Minnesota between 1973 and 1980. Both movements characterize their opponents as elite conspiracies whose influence is based upon misuse of powerful agencies and whose motives are tyrannous and unjust. Vilification strategies construct the enemy as simultaneously …
Her feminism doesn't fit
How Does WHO’s Covid-19 Response Build and Challenge the Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) Evidence-Base
includes the only official WHO evidence-based recommendations for RCCE practice, based on meta-syntheses of relevant literature through 2015. This analysis considered whether RCCE interventions undertaken during COVID-19 added strength to previous recommendations, filled evidence gaps, contradicted or added nuance to endorsements and conclusions, or pointed RCCE in new directions for future practice
Philosophy (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 work) · Artificial Intelligence (1 work) · Community engagement (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Feminism (1 work) · Gender Studies (1 work) · Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 work) · Guideline (1 work)