Jongtaik Choi
Biographic Data
| ID | 5601906 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jongtaik Choi |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jongtaik |
| FAMILY NAME | Choi |
| SIGNATURE | CHOI J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Korea University, Sejong, South Korea |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 6 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2016 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Retrospect and Prospect of Pyeongyangseong Castle Excavations
Radiocarbon Dating and the Historical Archaeology of Korea
Relying heavily upon historical records to build archaeological chronologies, many Korean historical archaeologists question the utility of radiocarbon dating. To challenge this tendency, we test a model based on historical records by analyzing radiocarbon dates. We dated two bulk samples from Hongryeonbong Fortress II, Seoul, South Korea, which is known historically to have been occupied between a.d. 500 and 551. By dividing bulk samples into sm…
AMS Dates from Two Archaeological Sites of Korea
In interpreting radiocarbon dating results, it is important that archaeologists distinguish uncertainties derived from random errors and those from systematic errors, because the two must be dealt with in different ways. One of the problems that archaeologists face in practice, however, is that when receiving dating results from laboratories, they are rarely able to critically assess whether differences between multiple 14 C dates of materials ar…
Radiocarbon Dating and the Historical Archaeology of Korea
Relying heavily upon historical records to build archaeological chronologies, many Korean historical archaeologists question the utility of radiocarbon dating. To challenge this tendency, we test a model based on historical records by analyzing radiocarbon dates. We dated two bulk samples from Hongryeonbong Fortress II, Seoul, South Korea, which is known historically to have been occupied between a.d. 500 and 551. By dividing bulk samples into sm…
AMS Dates from Two Archaeological Sites of Korea
In interpreting radiocarbon dating results, it is important that archaeologists distinguish uncertainties derived from random errors and those from systematic errors, because the two must be dealt with in different ways. One of the problems that archaeologists face in practice, however, is that when receiving dating results from laboratories, they are rarely able to critically assess whether differences between multiple 14 C dates of materials ar…
AMS Dates from Two Archaeological Sites of Korea
In interpreting radiocarbon dating results, it is important that archaeologists distinguish uncertainties derived from random errors and those from systematic errors, because the two must be dealt with in different ways. One of the problems that archaeologists face in practice, however, is that when receiving dating results from laboratories, they are rarely able to critically assess whether differences between multiple 14 C dates of materials ar…
Radiocarbon Dating and the Historical Archaeology of Korea
Relying heavily upon historical records to build archaeological chronologies, many Korean historical archaeologists question the utility of radiocarbon dating. To challenge this tendency, we test a model based on historical records by analyzing radiocarbon dates. We dated two bulk samples from Hongryeonbong Fortress II, Seoul, South Korea, which is known historically to have been occupied between a.d. 500 and 551. By dividing bulk samples into sm…
Retrospect and Prospect of Pyeongyangseong Castle Excavations
Archaeological Research and Protection (3 works) · Archaeology (3 works) · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 works) · Geology (2 works) · History (2 works) · Radiocarbon dating (2 works) · Ancient history (1 works) · Archaeological record (1 works) · Art (1 works) · Building materials and conservation (1 works)