Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mark A Lutz

Biographic Data

ID5605033
NAMEMark A Lutz
GIVEN NAMESMark A
FAMILY NAMELutz
SIGNATURELUTZ M A
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Maine
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS22
TOTAL CITATIONS34
AUTHOR COUNT22
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1979
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2008
H-INDEX4
  • The ‘Dismal Science’ – Still? Economics and Human Flourishing

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Political Economy•2008•Cited by: 2•References: 14

    This paper is an attempt to evaluate critically standard economic theory from the point of view of self-realization ethics and psychology. In doing so, there is considerable reliance on Abraham Maslow's well-known theory of personality development. According to his penetrating insight, it is insecurity that keeps a person trapped in a world of materialism – be it a desperate survival mentality, a preoccupation with excessive sexuality, or an unab…

  • Revisiting the Relevance of International Trade Theory

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    Probably one of the most controversial contributions to the literature of international trade theory was offered by the late social economist John Culbertson. In his view, low wage competition among corporations in a world characterized by capital mobility and massive trade deficits undermines the foundation trade theory based on David Ricardo’s celebrated notion of comparative advantage. Instead, there are several good reasons to believe that in…

  • Social economics, justice and the common good

    Open Access•Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•International Journal of Social…•2002

    A precise definition of “social economics” has been the subject of much debate for the last 30 years and, as yet, there seems to be no general consensus of opinion. This paper attempts to embrace the apparent pluralism of viewpoints as a temporary instrument to encourage critical debate and dialogue in order to work towards a unified concept of social economics.

  • Sorting the Wash

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•2001•References: 3

    It is a great pleasure and honor to have the opportunity to elutriate the criticisms of my book by three distinguished economists. Since two of the three reviews expressed some discomfort about either the general purpose and/or the basic orientation of the book, I will start out with a brief restatement about what it is supposed to be. This seems particularly necessary because my name is still associated by too many with Abraham Maslow and The Ch…

  • Distinguishing characteristics of ahuman economics

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•1999•References: 7

    What are the requirements for an economics that is compatible with, and affirmative of, a meaninful image of human nature? Where does conventional economic theory show its most glaring deficiencies in this respect? What are the core human values that need to inform economic thought capable of guiding us in the design and construction of a more humane economic system? Why is the bulk of contemporary heterodox economic thinking antagonistic to the …

  • Gender and cooperative behavior: Economic man rides alone

    Stephanie Seguino, Thomas Stevens et al.•ARTICLE•Feminist Economics•1996•Cited by: 5•References: 2

    Neoclassical theory posits an undifferentiated economic agent whose self-interested behavior promotes a tendency to free ride in the provision of public goods. Challenges to this rigid portrayal of human character have come from a variety of directions. A dozen years ago Gerald Marwell and Ruth Ames conducted experiments which showed that (virtually all male) economic graduate students tended to free ride significantly more than a mixed populatio…

  • Truth, self, and feminism

    Kenneth Lux, Mark A Lutz et al.•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•1996

    Humanistic economics is founded on the reality of human needs. One of those needs is for truth. According to the correspondence theory, that truth is a relation between statement and objective reality. This reality serves as a constraint on the (ego) self. Therefore, it can also be shown that self-interest is an independent principle from the commitment to truth, and that these two principles can clash. These two principles of the self, or the “h…

  • Centering Social Economics on Human Dignity 1

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1995•Cited by: 2•References: 23

    The paper explores a social economics centered on the normative value of human dignity. The first part of the paper explores the philosophical meaning of the concept. In the process, great weight is given to Alan Gewirth's “dialectically necessary argument” for human dignity, grounding the concept in human agency. The second part explores some of the apparent major implications: a rejection of both positive methodology and cultural relativism; th…

  • Commenting on Gendered Economics: Mushroom Men, Straw Men, and Real Persons

    Mark A Lutz, Kenneth Lux•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1995•References: 3

    This comment is offered as a defense of humanistic economics whose feminist credentials have been questioned by Julie Nelson. To her, our contribution is little less than orthodox economics, an ideology enshrining masculine values. We find her arguments based on a clear misreading or misinterpretation of our work. Especially needing correction is her charge that our key notion of a dual self is contaminated by traditional hierarchy and masculiniz…

  • Social economics and economics imperialism

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•1993•Cited by: 4•References: 2

  • Cardinal Issues in the Future of Social Economics: A Humanistic View

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1993•Cited by: 2•References: 8

    Social economics must be seeking its unity in the forces of human nature. That is no easy task. Elsewhere (Lutz, 1990, 407-42), I have indicated that our Association can be characterized as a rather heterogeneous group with several divergent orientations, but with a common core: a strong conviction that economic thinking and discourse cannot be carried out in an ethical vacuum, and that it is this explicit ethical foundation which is so distincti…

  • Humanistic economics: The mondo continues

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz et al.•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•1990•Cited by: 1•References: 1

  • Future wealth: A new economics for the 21st Century

    Open Access•Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Futures•1990•Cited by: 8

  • Emphasizing the Social: Social Economics and Socio-Economics

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1990•References: 18

    (1990). Emphasizing the Social: Social Economics and Socio-Economics. Review of Social Economy: Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 303-320

  • Social Economics: Retrospect and Prospect

    Keith Tribe, Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•The Economic History Review•1990

    This series is devoted to works that present divergent views on the development, prospects, and tensions within some important research areas of international economic thought.Among the fields covered are macromonetary policy, public finance, labor and political economy.The emphasis of the series is on providing a critical, constructive view of each of these fields, as well as a forum through which leading scholars of international reputation may…

  • McCain’s humanistic economics: A commentary

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz et al.•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•1989

    (1989). McCain’s humanistic economics: A commentary. Forum for Social Economics: Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 96-99

  • A Meditation on Economy and Society

    Open Access•Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•1987

  • A Meditation On Economy and Society

    Open Access•Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•1987

  • Instrumental Value Theory and Social Economics: A Rejoinder to Lewis Hill

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1986•References: 3

    It is a privilege to respond to the comments made by one of the great protagonists of instrumental value theory. Lewis Hill is both a direct disciple of Clarence Ayres and perhaps the most avid advocate for a reorientation of social economics along instrumentalist lines. We agree that the issues we are addressing are of overriding importance and so warrant public discussion and clarification. For his part, he chose to focus on four points he beli…

  • Pragmatism,Instrumental Value Theory and Social Economics

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1985•Cited by: 6•References: 10

    Since the summer of 1970, when the membership of the Catholic Economic Association voted to change its name to the Association for Social Economics and accepted a revised version of its aims and objec? tives, the association has grown not only in membership but also in heterogeneity. It seems to have been easier to agree on what is wrong with positivistic, mainstream economics than to define a normative conception of economic science that would c…

  • New directions in humanistic economics or How to overcome the utility monster

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz et al.•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•1984•Cited by: 2•References: 3

  • The Limitations of Karl Marx' Social Economics ∗

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1979•Cited by: 1•References: 8

  • Future wealth: A new economics for the 21st Century

    Open Access•Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Futures•1990•Cited by: 8

  • Pragmatism,Instrumental Value Theory and Social Economics

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1985•Cited by: 6•References: 10

    Since the summer of 1970, when the membership of the Catholic Economic Association voted to change its name to the Association for Social Economics and accepted a revised version of its aims and objec? tives, the association has grown not only in membership but also in heterogeneity. It seems to have been easier to agree on what is wrong with positivistic, mainstream economics than to define a normative conception of economic science that would c…

  • Gender and cooperative behavior: Economic man rides alone

    Stephanie Seguino, Thomas Stevens et al.•ARTICLE•Feminist Economics•1996•Cited by: 5•References: 2

    Neoclassical theory posits an undifferentiated economic agent whose self-interested behavior promotes a tendency to free ride in the provision of public goods. Challenges to this rigid portrayal of human character have come from a variety of directions. A dozen years ago Gerald Marwell and Ruth Ames conducted experiments which showed that (virtually all male) economic graduate students tended to free ride significantly more than a mixed populatio…

  • Social economics and economics imperialism

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•1993•Cited by: 4•References: 2

  • The ‘Dismal Science’ – Still? Economics and Human Flourishing

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Political Economy•2008•Cited by: 2•References: 14

    This paper is an attempt to evaluate critically standard economic theory from the point of view of self-realization ethics and psychology. In doing so, there is considerable reliance on Abraham Maslow's well-known theory of personality development. According to his penetrating insight, it is insecurity that keeps a person trapped in a world of materialism – be it a desperate survival mentality, a preoccupation with excessive sexuality, or an unab…

  • Centering Social Economics on Human Dignity 1

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1995•Cited by: 2•References: 23

    The paper explores a social economics centered on the normative value of human dignity. The first part of the paper explores the philosophical meaning of the concept. In the process, great weight is given to Alan Gewirth's “dialectically necessary argument” for human dignity, grounding the concept in human agency. The second part explores some of the apparent major implications: a rejection of both positive methodology and cultural relativism; th…

  • Cardinal Issues in the Future of Social Economics: A Humanistic View

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1993•Cited by: 2•References: 8

    Social economics must be seeking its unity in the forces of human nature. That is no easy task. Elsewhere (Lutz, 1990, 407-42), I have indicated that our Association can be characterized as a rather heterogeneous group with several divergent orientations, but with a common core: a strong conviction that economic thinking and discourse cannot be carried out in an ethical vacuum, and that it is this explicit ethical foundation which is so distincti…

  • New directions in humanistic economics or How to overcome the utility monster

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz et al.•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•1984•Cited by: 2•References: 3

  • Revisiting the Relevance of International Trade Theory

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    Probably one of the most controversial contributions to the literature of international trade theory was offered by the late social economist John Culbertson. In his view, low wage competition among corporations in a world characterized by capital mobility and massive trade deficits undermines the foundation trade theory based on David Ricardo’s celebrated notion of comparative advantage. Instead, there are several good reasons to believe that in…

  • Humanistic economics: The mondo continues

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz et al.•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•1990•Cited by: 1•References: 1

  • The Limitations of Karl Marx' Social Economics ∗

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1979•Cited by: 1•References: 8

  • The Limitations of Karl Marx' Social Economics ∗

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1979•Cited by: 1•References: 8

  • New directions in humanistic economics or How to overcome the utility monster

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz et al.•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•1984•Cited by: 2•References: 3

  • Pragmatism,Instrumental Value Theory and Social Economics

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1985•Cited by: 6•References: 10

    Since the summer of 1970, when the membership of the Catholic Economic Association voted to change its name to the Association for Social Economics and accepted a revised version of its aims and objec? tives, the association has grown not only in membership but also in heterogeneity. It seems to have been easier to agree on what is wrong with positivistic, mainstream economics than to define a normative conception of economic science that would c…

  • Instrumental Value Theory and Social Economics: A Rejoinder to Lewis Hill

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1986•References: 3

    It is a privilege to respond to the comments made by one of the great protagonists of instrumental value theory. Lewis Hill is both a direct disciple of Clarence Ayres and perhaps the most avid advocate for a reorientation of social economics along instrumentalist lines. We agree that the issues we are addressing are of overriding importance and so warrant public discussion and clarification. For his part, he chose to focus on four points he beli…

  • A Meditation on Economy and Society

    Open Access•Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•1987

  • A Meditation On Economy and Society

    Open Access•Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•1987

  • McCain’s humanistic economics: A commentary

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz et al.•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•1989

    (1989). McCain’s humanistic economics: A commentary. Forum for Social Economics: Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 96-99

  • Humanistic economics: The mondo continues

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz et al.•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•1990•Cited by: 1•References: 1

  • Future wealth: A new economics for the 21st Century

    Open Access•Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Futures•1990•Cited by: 8

  • Emphasizing the Social: Social Economics and Socio-Economics

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1990•References: 18

    (1990). Emphasizing the Social: Social Economics and Socio-Economics. Review of Social Economy: Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 303-320

  • Social Economics: Retrospect and Prospect

    Keith Tribe, Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•The Economic History Review•1990

    This series is devoted to works that present divergent views on the development, prospects, and tensions within some important research areas of international economic thought.Among the fields covered are macromonetary policy, public finance, labor and political economy.The emphasis of the series is on providing a critical, constructive view of each of these fields, as well as a forum through which leading scholars of international reputation may…

  • Social economics and economics imperialism

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•1993•Cited by: 4•References: 2

  • Cardinal Issues in the Future of Social Economics: A Humanistic View

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1993•Cited by: 2•References: 8

    Social economics must be seeking its unity in the forces of human nature. That is no easy task. Elsewhere (Lutz, 1990, 407-42), I have indicated that our Association can be characterized as a rather heterogeneous group with several divergent orientations, but with a common core: a strong conviction that economic thinking and discourse cannot be carried out in an ethical vacuum, and that it is this explicit ethical foundation which is so distincti…

  • Centering Social Economics on Human Dignity 1

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1995•Cited by: 2•References: 23

    The paper explores a social economics centered on the normative value of human dignity. The first part of the paper explores the philosophical meaning of the concept. In the process, great weight is given to Alan Gewirth's “dialectically necessary argument” for human dignity, grounding the concept in human agency. The second part explores some of the apparent major implications: a rejection of both positive methodology and cultural relativism; th…

  • Commenting on Gendered Economics: Mushroom Men, Straw Men, and Real Persons

    Mark A Lutz, Kenneth Lux•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•1995•References: 3

    This comment is offered as a defense of humanistic economics whose feminist credentials have been questioned by Julie Nelson. To her, our contribution is little less than orthodox economics, an ideology enshrining masculine values. We find her arguments based on a clear misreading or misinterpretation of our work. Especially needing correction is her charge that our key notion of a dual self is contaminated by traditional hierarchy and masculiniz…

  • Gender and cooperative behavior: Economic man rides alone

    Stephanie Seguino, Thomas Stevens et al.•ARTICLE•Feminist Economics•1996•Cited by: 5•References: 2

    Neoclassical theory posits an undifferentiated economic agent whose self-interested behavior promotes a tendency to free ride in the provision of public goods. Challenges to this rigid portrayal of human character have come from a variety of directions. A dozen years ago Gerald Marwell and Ruth Ames conducted experiments which showed that (virtually all male) economic graduate students tended to free ride significantly more than a mixed populatio…

  • Truth, self, and feminism

    Kenneth Lux, Mark A Lutz et al.•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•1996

    Humanistic economics is founded on the reality of human needs. One of those needs is for truth. According to the correspondence theory, that truth is a relation between statement and objective reality. This reality serves as a constraint on the (ego) self. Therefore, it can also be shown that self-interest is an independent principle from the commitment to truth, and that these two principles can clash. These two principles of the self, or the “h…

  • Distinguishing characteristics of ahuman economics

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•1999•References: 7

    What are the requirements for an economics that is compatible with, and affirmative of, a meaninful image of human nature? Where does conventional economic theory show its most glaring deficiencies in this respect? What are the core human values that need to inform economic thought capable of guiding us in the design and construction of a more humane economic system? Why is the bulk of contemporary heterodox economic thinking antagonistic to the …

  • Sorting the Wash

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Social Economy•2001•References: 3

    It is a great pleasure and honor to have the opportunity to elutriate the criticisms of my book by three distinguished economists. Since two of the three reviews expressed some discomfort about either the general purpose and/or the basic orientation of the book, I will start out with a brief restatement about what it is supposed to be. This seems particularly necessary because my name is still associated by too many with Abraham Maslow and The Ch…

  • Social economics, justice and the common good

    Open Access•Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•International Journal of Social…•2002

    A precise definition of “social economics” has been the subject of much debate for the last 30 years and, as yet, there seems to be no general consensus of opinion. This paper attempts to embrace the apparent pluralism of viewpoints as a temporary instrument to encourage critical debate and dialogue in order to work towards a unified concept of social economics.

  • The ‘Dismal Science’ – Still? Economics and Human Flourishing

    Mark A Lutz•ARTICLE•Review of Political Economy•2008•Cited by: 2•References: 14

    This paper is an attempt to evaluate critically standard economic theory from the point of view of self-realization ethics and psychology. In doing so, there is considerable reliance on Abraham Maslow's well-known theory of personality development. According to his penetrating insight, it is insecurity that keeps a person trapped in a world of materialism – be it a desperate survival mentality, a preoccupation with excessive sexuality, or an unab…

  • Revisiting the Relevance of International Trade Theory

    Mark A Lutz, Mark Lutz•ARTICLE•Forum for Social Economics•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    Probably one of the most controversial contributions to the literature of international trade theory was offered by the late social economist John Culbertson. In his view, low wage competition among corporations in a world characterized by capital mobility and massive trade deficits undermines the foundation trade theory based on David Ricardo’s celebrated notion of comparative advantage. Instead, there are several good reasons to believe that in…

Economics (20 works) · Economic Theory and Institutions (19 works) · Sociology (17 works) · Positive economics (16 works) · Political science (15 works) · Law (13 works) · Neoclassical economics (9 works) · Philosophy (9 works) · Epistemology (8 works) · Law (6 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae