Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mait Kõiv

Biographic Data

ID5633251
NAMEMait Kõiv
GIVEN NAMESMait
FAMILY NAMEKõiv
SIGNATUREKÕIV M
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Tartu, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Institute of History and Archaeology
ORCID0000-0002-2259-7261
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS10
TOTAL CITATIONS7
WORKS AS AUTHOR8
WORKS AS EDITOR2
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2001
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
H-INDEX2
  • Crisis in Early Religion

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv, Märt Läänemets et al.•EDITOR•BOOK•Crisis in Early Religion•2022

  • Power and Opposition in the Ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean World – Introduction

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv, Vladimir Sazonov•EDITOR•ARTICLE•STUDIA ANTIQUA ET ARCHAEOLOGICA•2022

  • Monarchy in the Iron Age Levant and Archaic Greece

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•STUDIA ANTIQUA ET ARCHAEOLOGICA•2022

    Tyrannies emerging in the Greek poleis during the Archaic period (8.–6. centuries BC), among which the rule of the Kypselid dynasty in Corinth appears as an outstanding example, were in many respects comparable to the city-state monarchies in Ancient Near East, particularly in Iron Age Levant. The rulers performed important governmental functions and were able to legitimate their power for a notable period of time. However, differently from the E…

  • Justification of the Usurpation of Power by Hittite Kings

    Open Access•Vladimir Sazonov, Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•STUDIA ANTIQUA ET ARCHAEOLOGICA•2022

    The article explores the ways how Hittite kings justified their usurpations of power, such usurpations happening almost constantly during the whole period of the Hittite kingdom, from the Old Hittite period until the fall of the empire. It focuses on three outstanding texts illuminating prominent cases in the Hittite history: the Proclamation of Telepinu which gives important information about several usurpations during the late 17th and 16th cen…

  • Greek rulers and imperial powers in Western Anatolia (8th–6th centuries BC1)

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•STUDIA ANTIQUA ET ARCHAEOLOGICA•2021

    The article explores the cultural and political interaction between the Anatolian kingdoms and the elites of the Greek poleis on the Anatolian coast, with special attention to Archaic Ephesos for which relatively good evidence for the relations with Lydia is available. It demonstrates how the neighbouring hegemonic monarchies provided imitable examples for the Greek elite leaders and offered real opportunities for claiming, legitimating and entre…

  • Why Did the Greeks hate the Tyrants? A Comparative View on Monarchy in Archaic Greece

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•Historia•2021

    Archaic tyrannies, emerging during the period of polis formation, are in many respects comparable to city-state monarchies in the eastern Mediterranean and the Near East. There is every reason to consider tyranny as a vehicle for state formation in Archaic Greece. However, Greek poleis eventually did not accept monarchy as a legitimate form of government. The article discusses the reason precluding the entrenchment of sole rule in Archaic Greek p…

  • Basileus, tyrannos and polis. The Dynamics of Monarchy in Early Greece

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•Klio•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 62

    The article scrutinizes the development of the forms of leadership in the Early Iron Age and Archaic Greece, questioning the traditional view that personal leadership as described in the Homeric epics (the ‚Homeric basileia ‘) was the rule during the Early Iron Age, but was replaced in the Archaic period by collective aristocracies, and by tyrannies as a principally new kind of monarchy. The article questions the strict distinction between the ‚c…

  • Pheidon of Argos

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•CHAPTER•The Encyclopedia of Ancient History•2012

    Pheidon was a king (basileus) or tyrant of Argos in the Archaic period (eighth to sixth century bce ).

  • A Note on the Dating of Hesiod

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•2011•Cited by: 4

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • The dating of Pheidon in antiquity

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•Klio•2001•Cited by: 1

  • A Note on the Dating of Hesiod

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•2011•Cited by: 4

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Basileus, tyrannos and polis. The Dynamics of Monarchy in Early Greece

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•Klio•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 62

    The article scrutinizes the development of the forms of leadership in the Early Iron Age and Archaic Greece, questioning the traditional view that personal leadership as described in the Homeric epics (the ‚Homeric basileia ‘) was the rule during the Early Iron Age, but was replaced in the Archaic period by collective aristocracies, and by tyrannies as a principally new kind of monarchy. The article questions the strict distinction between the ‚c…

  • The dating of Pheidon in antiquity

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•Klio•2001•Cited by: 1

  • The dating of Pheidon in antiquity

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•Klio•2001•Cited by: 1

  • A Note on the Dating of Hesiod

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•The Classical Quarterly•2011•Cited by: 4

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Pheidon of Argos

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•CHAPTER•The Encyclopedia of Ancient History•2012

    Pheidon was a king (basileus) or tyrant of Argos in the Archaic period (eighth to sixth century bce ).

  • Basileus, tyrannos and polis. The Dynamics of Monarchy in Early Greece

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•Klio•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 62

    The article scrutinizes the development of the forms of leadership in the Early Iron Age and Archaic Greece, questioning the traditional view that personal leadership as described in the Homeric epics (the ‚Homeric basileia ‘) was the rule during the Early Iron Age, but was replaced in the Archaic period by collective aristocracies, and by tyrannies as a principally new kind of monarchy. The article questions the strict distinction between the ‚c…

  • Greek rulers and imperial powers in Western Anatolia (8th–6th centuries BC1)

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•STUDIA ANTIQUA ET ARCHAEOLOGICA•2021

    The article explores the cultural and political interaction between the Anatolian kingdoms and the elites of the Greek poleis on the Anatolian coast, with special attention to Archaic Ephesos for which relatively good evidence for the relations with Lydia is available. It demonstrates how the neighbouring hegemonic monarchies provided imitable examples for the Greek elite leaders and offered real opportunities for claiming, legitimating and entre…

  • Why Did the Greeks hate the Tyrants? A Comparative View on Monarchy in Archaic Greece

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•Historia•2021

    Archaic tyrannies, emerging during the period of polis formation, are in many respects comparable to city-state monarchies in the eastern Mediterranean and the Near East. There is every reason to consider tyranny as a vehicle for state formation in Archaic Greece. However, Greek poleis eventually did not accept monarchy as a legitimate form of government. The article discusses the reason precluding the entrenchment of sole rule in Archaic Greek p…

  • Crisis in Early Religion

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv, Märt Läänemets et al.•EDITOR•BOOK•Crisis in Early Religion•2022

  • Power and Opposition in the Ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean World – Introduction

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv, Vladimir Sazonov•EDITOR•ARTICLE•STUDIA ANTIQUA ET ARCHAEOLOGICA•2022

  • Monarchy in the Iron Age Levant and Archaic Greece

    Open Access•Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•STUDIA ANTIQUA ET ARCHAEOLOGICA•2022

    Tyrannies emerging in the Greek poleis during the Archaic period (8.–6. centuries BC), among which the rule of the Kypselid dynasty in Corinth appears as an outstanding example, were in many respects comparable to the city-state monarchies in Ancient Near East, particularly in Iron Age Levant. The rulers performed important governmental functions and were able to legitimate their power for a notable period of time. However, differently from the E…

  • Justification of the Usurpation of Power by Hittite Kings

    Open Access•Vladimir Sazonov, Mait Kõiv•ARTICLE•STUDIA ANTIQUA ET ARCHAEOLOGICA•2022

    The article explores the ways how Hittite kings justified their usurpations of power, such usurpations happening almost constantly during the whole period of the Hittite kingdom, from the Old Hittite period until the fall of the empire. It focuses on three outstanding texts illuminating prominent cases in the Hittite history: the Proclamation of Telepinu which gives important information about several usurpations during the late 17th and 16th cen…

History (9 works) · Ancient history (8 works) · Classical Antiquity Studies (6 works) · Political science (5 works) · Ancient Near East History (4 works) · Art (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Politics (4 works) · Archaeology (3 works) · Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae