Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Hilla Halla‐aho

Biographic Data

ID5635825
NAMEHilla Halla‐aho
GIVEN NAMESHilla
FAMILY NAMEHalla‐aho
SIGNATUREAHO H H
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Helsinki
ORCID0000-0001-9367-9670
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS3
AUTHOR COUNT6
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2002
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2012
H-INDEX1
  • Variation and change in Greek and Latin

    Hilla Halla-aho, Marja Vierros et al.•BOOK•Variation and change in Greek and…•2012

  • Colloquial and literary language in early Roman tragedy

    Open Access•Hilla Halla‐aho, Hilla Halla-aho et al.•CHAPTER•Colloquial and Literary Latin•2010

    INTRODUCTION Roman tragedy has not received the same amount of careful examination as Greek tragedy – not even the tragic œuvre of Seneca and those few other tragedies that happened to survive in full. Partly the fragmentary nature of the textual corpus is to blame, but also, and this is perhaps even more important, the fact that Roman tragedy never managed to leave behind its smell of being secondary, of being derivative, and of being inferior t…

  • Requesting in a letter: context, syntax and the choice between complements in the letters of Cicero and Pliny the Younger1

    Open Access•Hilla Halla‐aho, Hilla Halla-aho•ARTICLE•Transactions of the Philological…•2010

    This article addresses the question of how the choice between two complements is determined in the case of Latin rogo‘I ask’. When rogo has the meaning ‘to request, to ask a favour’ (as opposed to asking a question), it is usually followed by a (final) complement clause that either is or is not introduced by the conjunction ut (the subordinate predicate is always in the subjunctive). Traditionally, the difference between these two constructions h…

  • Linguistic Varieties and Language Level in Latin Non-Literary Letters

    Hilla Halla‐aho, Hilla Halla-aho•CHAPTER•The language of the papyri•2009

    The Latin letters on papyri, ostraca, and wooden tablets offer many interesting aspects for the study of variation and change in the Latin language. However, it is not always clear how this evidence should be interpreted. For any kind of linguistic research on these letters it is reasonable to assume that every writer of these texts tried to write as well as he or she possibly could, and hence that deviations from the standard are unintentional, …

  • Pompeian Wall Inscriptions and the Latin Language

    Open Access•Peter Kruschwitz, Hilla Halla‐aho et al.•ARTICLE•Arctos – Acta Philologica Fennica•2008•Cited by: 2

  • A Marriage Contract

    Hilla Halla‐aho, Hilla Halla-aho et al.•ARTICLE•Mnemosyne•2002•Cited by: 1

    In this paper we approach a Latin marriage contract from Philadelphia, Egypt, taking into account various viewpoints. The document is written in Latin, a language that was not commonly used in the community. As a result of the language choice the contract offers a possibility for a contact linguistic analysis. The names of the father of the bride and the future husband, Nomissianus and M. Petronius Servillius respectively, are Roman, so there pro…

  • Pompeian Wall Inscriptions and the Latin Language

    Open Access•Peter Kruschwitz, Hilla Halla‐aho et al.•ARTICLE•Arctos – Acta Philologica Fennica•2008•Cited by: 2

  • A Marriage Contract

    Hilla Halla‐aho, Hilla Halla-aho et al.•ARTICLE•Mnemosyne•2002•Cited by: 1

    In this paper we approach a Latin marriage contract from Philadelphia, Egypt, taking into account various viewpoints. The document is written in Latin, a language that was not commonly used in the community. As a result of the language choice the contract offers a possibility for a contact linguistic analysis. The names of the father of the bride and the future husband, Nomissianus and M. Petronius Servillius respectively, are Roman, so there pro…

  • A Marriage Contract

    Hilla Halla‐aho, Hilla Halla-aho et al.•ARTICLE•Mnemosyne•2002•Cited by: 1

    In this paper we approach a Latin marriage contract from Philadelphia, Egypt, taking into account various viewpoints. The document is written in Latin, a language that was not commonly used in the community. As a result of the language choice the contract offers a possibility for a contact linguistic analysis. The names of the father of the bride and the future husband, Nomissianus and M. Petronius Servillius respectively, are Roman, so there pro…

  • Pompeian Wall Inscriptions and the Latin Language

    Open Access•Peter Kruschwitz, Hilla Halla‐aho et al.•ARTICLE•Arctos – Acta Philologica Fennica•2008•Cited by: 2

  • Linguistic Varieties and Language Level in Latin Non-Literary Letters

    Hilla Halla‐aho, Hilla Halla-aho•CHAPTER•The language of the papyri•2009

    The Latin letters on papyri, ostraca, and wooden tablets offer many interesting aspects for the study of variation and change in the Latin language. However, it is not always clear how this evidence should be interpreted. For any kind of linguistic research on these letters it is reasonable to assume that every writer of these texts tried to write as well as he or she possibly could, and hence that deviations from the standard are unintentional, …

  • Colloquial and literary language in early Roman tragedy

    Open Access•Hilla Halla‐aho, Hilla Halla-aho et al.•CHAPTER•Colloquial and Literary Latin•2010

    INTRODUCTION Roman tragedy has not received the same amount of careful examination as Greek tragedy – not even the tragic œuvre of Seneca and those few other tragedies that happened to survive in full. Partly the fragmentary nature of the textual corpus is to blame, but also, and this is perhaps even more important, the fact that Roman tragedy never managed to leave behind its smell of being secondary, of being derivative, and of being inferior t…

  • Requesting in a letter: context, syntax and the choice between complements in the letters of Cicero and Pliny the Younger1

    Open Access•Hilla Halla‐aho, Hilla Halla-aho•ARTICLE•Transactions of the Philological…•2010

    This article addresses the question of how the choice between two complements is determined in the case of Latin rogo‘I ask’. When rogo has the meaning ‘to request, to ask a favour’ (as opposed to asking a question), it is usually followed by a (final) complement clause that either is or is not introduced by the conjunction ut (the subordinate predicate is always in the subjunctive). Traditionally, the difference between these two constructions h…

  • Variation and change in Greek and Latin

    Hilla Halla-aho, Marja Vierros et al.•BOOK•Variation and change in Greek and…•2012

History (5 works) · Classical Antiquity Studies (4 works) · Linguistics (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Art (3 works) · Linguistics and language evolution (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 works) · History (2 works) · Latin Americans (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae