Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Len H Carpenter

Biographic Data

ID5638870
NAMELen H Carpenter
GIVEN NAMESLen H
FAMILY NAMECarpenter
SIGNATURECARPENTER L H
AFFILIATIONSWildlife Management Institute
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2000
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2003
H-INDEX0
  • Adaptive Impact Management

    Shawn J Riley, Shawn Riley et al.•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2003

    Wildlife professionals need better ways to integrate ecological and human dimensions of wildlife management. A focus on impacts, guided by a structured decision process, will orient wildlife management toward rigorous, integrative decision making. Impacts are important socially defined effects of events and interactions related to wildlife that merit management. To manage impacts we propose adaptive impact management (AIM). This approach has seve…

  • Introduction to special issue on stakeholder acceptance capacity

    Daniel J Decker, Len H Carpenter et al.•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2000

    (2000). Introduction to special issue on stakeholder acceptance capacity. Human Dimensions of Wildlife: Vol. 5, Stakeholder Acceptance Capacity, pp. 3-4

  • Stakeholder Acceptance Capacity in Wildlife management

    Len H Carpenter, Daniel J Decker et al.•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2000

    Capacity understanding has been a central driving force in both the biological and human dimensions of wildlife management. The concept of biological carrying capacity has been recognized for a long time. For many years, reference has been made to another form of carrying capacity, that of society to tolerate or accept the impacts of wildlife in particular situations. Attempts to articulate this concept have taken several forms, but all generally…

  • Developing the wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity concept

    Larry M Gigliotti, Larry Gigliotti et al.•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2000

    The concept of wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity (WSAC) has developed from different perspectives. Depending on the perspective taken by the scholars addressing the concept, it may be seen as primarily cultural, social, or economic in nature. Despite the “fuzziness,”; the development of these various perspectives on the concept has enhanced its emerging place as a fundamental element of modern wildlife management. However, our own experien…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Introduction to special issue on stakeholder acceptance capacity

    Daniel J Decker, Len H Carpenter et al.•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2000

    (2000). Introduction to special issue on stakeholder acceptance capacity. Human Dimensions of Wildlife: Vol. 5, Stakeholder Acceptance Capacity, pp. 3-4

  • Stakeholder Acceptance Capacity in Wildlife management

    Len H Carpenter, Daniel J Decker et al.•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2000

    Capacity understanding has been a central driving force in both the biological and human dimensions of wildlife management. The concept of biological carrying capacity has been recognized for a long time. For many years, reference has been made to another form of carrying capacity, that of society to tolerate or accept the impacts of wildlife in particular situations. Attempts to articulate this concept have taken several forms, but all generally…

  • Developing the wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity concept

    Larry M Gigliotti, Larry Gigliotti et al.•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2000

    The concept of wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity (WSAC) has developed from different perspectives. Depending on the perspective taken by the scholars addressing the concept, it may be seen as primarily cultural, social, or economic in nature. Despite the “fuzziness,”; the development of these various perspectives on the concept has enhanced its emerging place as a fundamental element of modern wildlife management. However, our own experien…

  • Adaptive Impact Management

    Shawn J Riley, Shawn Riley et al.•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2003

    Wildlife professionals need better ways to integrate ecological and human dimensions of wildlife management. A focus on impacts, guided by a structured decision process, will orient wildlife management toward rigorous, integrative decision making. Impacts are important socially defined effects of events and interactions related to wildlife that merit management. To manage impacts we propose adaptive impact management (AIM). This approach has seve…

Business (4 works) · Ecology (4 works) · Economics (4 works) · Environmental resource management (4 works) · Forest Management and Policy (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Public relations (4 works) · Stakeholder (4 works) · Wildlife (4 works) · Psychology (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae