Dimitri A Korobeinikov
Biographic Data
| ID | 5653900 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Dimitri A Korobeinikov |
| GIVEN NAMES | Dimitri A |
| FAMILY NAME | Korobeinikov |
| SIGNATURE | KOROBEINIKOV D A |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2004 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
These are the narratives of bygone years«
In 1502 or 1503 KemÄ l paÅ a-zÄ de (d. 1534), also known as Ibn-i KemÄ l, the future Å eyhâ Ã1⁄4l-İslam (chief Muslim judge) under SulaymÄ n the Magnificent, described the world of Byzantium which the Ottomans had conquered. There, he reproduced the realia of the »fortress past« of the Ottomans. Ibn-i KemÄ l described Byzantium as a commonwealth of fortresses, each headed by a tekvur (»emperor«), which was at odds with historical accuracy. This p…
The Ilkhans in the Byzantine Sources
The Il-Khāns maintained close contacts with two Greek states: the Empire of Trebizond and Byzantium of the Palaiologoi. While the sources of the Empire of Trebizond were scanty and developed no image of the Il-Khāns as these might have been perceived in Trebizond, the Byzantine historical tradition, centered in Nicaea and then in Constantinople, was far richer and produced colorful literature descriptions of the rulers of the Mongol Īrān, from Hü…
‘The King of the East and the West’
A broken mirror
It is difficult to say whether, and to what extent, the Turkic society in Egypt mirrored the ethnic and tribal structures of the Dasht-i Kipcak. The reluctance of the Arabic chroniclers to name the Mamlūks 'Kipcaks' speaks for itself. The Kipcak dominance of the early Mamlūk society had fortunate repercussions for historians of Dasht-i Kipcak. For the Cuman slaves brought with them stories about their former homeland. This chapter, among other th…
Diplomatic correspondence between Byzantium and the Mamlūk Sultanate in the fourteenth century
The present paper studies the titles of the Byzantine emperors used by the Mamlūk chancery. The surviving Mamlūk chancery textbooks of the fourteenth century provide us with new, rich data on the modes of address customarily employed by the Mamlūk sultans in writing to the Byzantine emperors. What determined the choice of a particular title? Were these titles translated into Arabic from the Byzantine originals or were these formulas the invention…
No prominent works on this page.
Diplomatic correspondence between Byzantium and the Mamlūk Sultanate in the fourteenth century
The present paper studies the titles of the Byzantine emperors used by the Mamlūk chancery. The surviving Mamlūk chancery textbooks of the fourteenth century provide us with new, rich data on the modes of address customarily employed by the Mamlūk sultans in writing to the Byzantine emperors. What determined the choice of a particular title? Were these titles translated into Arabic from the Byzantine originals or were these formulas the invention…
A broken mirror
It is difficult to say whether, and to what extent, the Turkic society in Egypt mirrored the ethnic and tribal structures of the Dasht-i Kipcak. The reluctance of the Arabic chroniclers to name the Mamlūks 'Kipcaks' speaks for itself. The Kipcak dominance of the early Mamlūk society had fortunate repercussions for historians of Dasht-i Kipcak. For the Cuman slaves brought with them stories about their former homeland. This chapter, among other th…
‘The King of the East and the West’
The Ilkhans in the Byzantine Sources
The Il-Khāns maintained close contacts with two Greek states: the Empire of Trebizond and Byzantium of the Palaiologoi. While the sources of the Empire of Trebizond were scanty and developed no image of the Il-Khāns as these might have been perceived in Trebizond, the Byzantine historical tradition, centered in Nicaea and then in Constantinople, was far richer and produced colorful literature descriptions of the rulers of the Mongol Īrān, from Hü…
These are the narratives of bygone years«
In 1502 or 1503 KemÄ l paÅ a-zÄ de (d. 1534), also known as Ibn-i KemÄ l, the future Å eyhâ Ã1⁄4l-İslam (chief Muslim judge) under SulaymÄ n the Magnificent, described the world of Byzantium which the Ottomans had conquered. There, he reproduced the realia of the »fortress past« of the Ottomans. Ibn-i KemÄ l described Byzantium as a commonwealth of fortresses, each headed by a tekvur (»emperor«), which was at odds with historical accuracy. This p…
Ancient history (5 works) · History (5 works) · Archaeology and Historical Studies (4 works) · Byzantine Studies and History (4 works) · Eurasian Exchange Networks (4 works) · Archaeology (3 works) · Art (3 works) · Byzantine architecture (3 works) · Emperor (3 works) · Law (2 works)