Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Giel Ton

Biographic Data

ID5655277
NAMEGiel Ton
GIVEN NAMESGiel
FAMILY NAMETon
SIGNATURETON G
AFFILIATIONSInstitute of Development Studies
ORCID0000-0003-1730-9517
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS11
TOTAL CITATIONS51
WORKS AS AUTHOR11
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2012
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX3
  • Methodological bricolage, data pattern detection and realist explanation

    Open Access•Giel Ton•ARTICLE•Evaluation•2025•References: 14

    This article shows how a realist portfolio analysis was operationalised as part of an evaluation of a donor-funded development programme. This programme supports small and medium-sized enterprises with data analytics and business coaching to make their sourcing and service delivery models more smallholder inclusive. After ranking all projects on relative effectiveness in convincing business owners to change their business model, we applied an ite…

  • Exploring Synergies Between Community Mobilisation and Cash Transfers in Bangladesh

    Open Access•Afrin Aktar, Keetie Roelen et al.•ARTICLE•IDS Bulletin•2024

    This article presents insights from the Child Labour: Action-Research-Innovation in South and South-Eastern Asia (CLARISSA) social protection cash plus intervention in a low‐income neighbourhood in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Adopting a novel methodology, we use community mobilisers’ monthly narrative reports, so-called ‘micronarratives’, to understand synergies between implementation and outcomes of community mobilisation activities (the ‘plus’) and cash…

  • Glossary

    Open Access•Giel Ton, Sietze Vellema•ARTICLE•IDS Bulletin•2022

    This is the glossary for IDS Bulletin Vol 53 No 1: Theory-Based Evaluation of Inclusive Business Programmes

  • The Search for Real-Time Impact Monitoring for Private Sector Support Programmes

    Open Access•Fédes Van Rijn, Haki Pamuk et al.•ARTICLE•IDS Bulletin•2022

    An increasing consensus exists in the impact evaluation literature on using detailed theory-based evaluations to evaluate complex programmes such as private sector development (PSD) programmes. At the same time, PSD managers expect periodic and timely (so-called ‘real-time’) input from evaluators to improve programmes throughout their implementation. This article presents insights from real-time theory-based monitoring and evaluation shaped by th…

  • Assessing the Contribution to Market System Change of the Private Enterprise Programme Ethiopia

    Open Access•Giel Ton, Ben Taylor et al.•ARTICLE•IDS Bulletin•2022

    An impact evaluation of a pro-poor market system development programme, ‘Making Markets Work for the Poor’ (M4P), poses several methodological issues for evaluators. M4P interventions intend to change the contextual conditions in which stakeholders take business decisions so that it triggers change processes in the wider social system and ultimately benefits poor people. An impact evaluation design for such a programme thus needs to be robust eno…

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Giel Ton, Sietze Vellema•ARTICLE•IDS Bulletin•2022

    The private sector has become an important partner in development interventions that aim to make market systems more favourable for smallholders and low-income consumers of food. How to evaluate these inclusive business programmes is the central theme of this IDS Bulletin. It presents real-world experiences of practitioners and academics using theory-based evaluation. This introductory article highlights the approaches and methods used to assess …

  • Rethinking technological change in smallholder agriculture

    Open Access•Dominic Glover, James Sumberg et al.•ARTICLE•Outlook on Agriculture•2019

    The concept of technology adoption (along with its companions, diffusion and scaling) is commonly used to design development interventions, to frame impact evaluations and to inform decision-making about new investments in development-oriented agricultural research. However, adoption simplifies and mischaracterises what happens during processes of technological change. In all but the very simplest cases, it is likely to be inadequate to capture t…

  • Contract farming for improving smallholder incomes

    Open Access•Giel Ton, Wytse Vellema et al.•ARTICLE•World Development•2017•Cited by: 39•References: 6

  • The Triviality of Measuring Ultimate Outcomes

    Open Access•Giel Ton, Sietze Vellema et al.•ARTICLE•IDS Bulletin•2014•Cited by: 2•References: 17

    Sustainability standards and certification schemes have been promoted as a market-driven instrument for realising development impacts and receive public funding. As a result, companies, NGOs and supporting donors and governments want to know if these ambitions have been fulfilled. Their tendency is to commission household surveys to assess net effects of certification in areas such as poverty, productivity and food security. This article argues t…

  • Value chains, partnerships and development

    Open Access•Sietze Vellema, Giel Ton et al.•ARTICLE•Evaluation•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 10

    Partnerships between companies and non-governmental organizations that aim to incorporate smallholder farmers into value chains are increasingly being promoted as a way of pursuing development goals. This article investigates two case studies of such partnerships and the outcomes they achieved in order to refine the rationale underlying such interventions. In two case studies in Uganda and Rwanda, we documented the sequences of events within such…

  • The mixing of methods

    Open Access•Giel Ton•ARTICLE•Evaluation•2012•Cited by: 6•References: 4

    This article describes a systematic process that is helpful in improving impact evaluation assignments, within restricted budgets and timelines. It involves three steps: a rethink of the key questions of the evaluation to develop more relevant, specific questions; a way of designing a mix of research methods to generate evidence that supports more valid conclusions; and a step that aims to make evaluation outputs more useful. The approach is illu…

  • Contract farming for improving smallholder incomes

    Open Access•Giel Ton, Wytse Vellema et al.•ARTICLE•World Development•2017•Cited by: 39•References: 6

  • The mixing of methods

    Open Access•Giel Ton•ARTICLE•Evaluation•2012•Cited by: 6•References: 4

    This article describes a systematic process that is helpful in improving impact evaluation assignments, within restricted budgets and timelines. It involves three steps: a rethink of the key questions of the evaluation to develop more relevant, specific questions; a way of designing a mix of research methods to generate evidence that supports more valid conclusions; and a step that aims to make evaluation outputs more useful. The approach is illu…

  • Value chains, partnerships and development

    Open Access•Sietze Vellema, Giel Ton et al.•ARTICLE•Evaluation•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 10

    Partnerships between companies and non-governmental organizations that aim to incorporate smallholder farmers into value chains are increasingly being promoted as a way of pursuing development goals. This article investigates two case studies of such partnerships and the outcomes they achieved in order to refine the rationale underlying such interventions. In two case studies in Uganda and Rwanda, we documented the sequences of events within such…

  • The Triviality of Measuring Ultimate Outcomes

    Open Access•Giel Ton, Sietze Vellema et al.•ARTICLE•IDS Bulletin•2014•Cited by: 2•References: 17

    Sustainability standards and certification schemes have been promoted as a market-driven instrument for realising development impacts and receive public funding. As a result, companies, NGOs and supporting donors and governments want to know if these ambitions have been fulfilled. Their tendency is to commission household surveys to assess net effects of certification in areas such as poverty, productivity and food security. This article argues t…

  • The mixing of methods

    Open Access•Giel Ton•ARTICLE•Evaluation•2012•Cited by: 6•References: 4

    This article describes a systematic process that is helpful in improving impact evaluation assignments, within restricted budgets and timelines. It involves three steps: a rethink of the key questions of the evaluation to develop more relevant, specific questions; a way of designing a mix of research methods to generate evidence that supports more valid conclusions; and a step that aims to make evaluation outputs more useful. The approach is illu…

  • Value chains, partnerships and development

    Open Access•Sietze Vellema, Giel Ton et al.•ARTICLE•Evaluation•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 10

    Partnerships between companies and non-governmental organizations that aim to incorporate smallholder farmers into value chains are increasingly being promoted as a way of pursuing development goals. This article investigates two case studies of such partnerships and the outcomes they achieved in order to refine the rationale underlying such interventions. In two case studies in Uganda and Rwanda, we documented the sequences of events within such…

  • The Triviality of Measuring Ultimate Outcomes

    Open Access•Giel Ton, Sietze Vellema et al.•ARTICLE•IDS Bulletin•2014•Cited by: 2•References: 17

    Sustainability standards and certification schemes have been promoted as a market-driven instrument for realising development impacts and receive public funding. As a result, companies, NGOs and supporting donors and governments want to know if these ambitions have been fulfilled. Their tendency is to commission household surveys to assess net effects of certification in areas such as poverty, productivity and food security. This article argues t…

  • Contract farming for improving smallholder incomes

    Open Access•Giel Ton, Wytse Vellema et al.•ARTICLE•World Development•2017•Cited by: 39•References: 6

  • Rethinking technological change in smallholder agriculture

    Open Access•Dominic Glover, James Sumberg et al.•ARTICLE•Outlook on Agriculture•2019

    The concept of technology adoption (along with its companions, diffusion and scaling) is commonly used to design development interventions, to frame impact evaluations and to inform decision-making about new investments in development-oriented agricultural research. However, adoption simplifies and mischaracterises what happens during processes of technological change. In all but the very simplest cases, it is likely to be inadequate to capture t…

  • Glossary

    Open Access•Giel Ton, Sietze Vellema•ARTICLE•IDS Bulletin•2022

    This is the glossary for IDS Bulletin Vol 53 No 1: Theory-Based Evaluation of Inclusive Business Programmes

  • The Search for Real-Time Impact Monitoring for Private Sector Support Programmes

    Open Access•Fédes Van Rijn, Haki Pamuk et al.•ARTICLE•IDS Bulletin•2022

    An increasing consensus exists in the impact evaluation literature on using detailed theory-based evaluations to evaluate complex programmes such as private sector development (PSD) programmes. At the same time, PSD managers expect periodic and timely (so-called ‘real-time’) input from evaluators to improve programmes throughout their implementation. This article presents insights from real-time theory-based monitoring and evaluation shaped by th…

  • Assessing the Contribution to Market System Change of the Private Enterprise Programme Ethiopia

    Open Access•Giel Ton, Ben Taylor et al.•ARTICLE•IDS Bulletin•2022

    An impact evaluation of a pro-poor market system development programme, ‘Making Markets Work for the Poor’ (M4P), poses several methodological issues for evaluators. M4P interventions intend to change the contextual conditions in which stakeholders take business decisions so that it triggers change processes in the wider social system and ultimately benefits poor people. An impact evaluation design for such a programme thus needs to be robust eno…

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Giel Ton, Sietze Vellema•ARTICLE•IDS Bulletin•2022

    The private sector has become an important partner in development interventions that aim to make market systems more favourable for smallholders and low-income consumers of food. How to evaluate these inclusive business programmes is the central theme of this IDS Bulletin. It presents real-world experiences of practitioners and academics using theory-based evaluation. This introductory article highlights the approaches and methods used to assess …

  • Exploring Synergies Between Community Mobilisation and Cash Transfers in Bangladesh

    Open Access•Afrin Aktar, Keetie Roelen et al.•ARTICLE•IDS Bulletin•2024

    This article presents insights from the Child Labour: Action-Research-Innovation in South and South-Eastern Asia (CLARISSA) social protection cash plus intervention in a low‐income neighbourhood in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Adopting a novel methodology, we use community mobilisers’ monthly narrative reports, so-called ‘micronarratives’, to understand synergies between implementation and outcomes of community mobilisation activities (the ‘plus’) and cash…

  • Methodological bricolage, data pattern detection and realist explanation

    Open Access•Giel Ton•ARTICLE•Evaluation•2025•References: 14

    This article shows how a realist portfolio analysis was operationalised as part of an evaluation of a donor-funded development programme. This programme supports small and medium-sized enterprises with data analytics and business coaching to make their sourcing and service delivery models more smallholder inclusive. After ranking all projects on relative effectiveness in convincing business owners to change their business model, we applied an ite…

Economics (8 works) · Business (7 works) · Computer Science (6 works) · Evaluation and Performance Assessment (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Agricultural Innovations and Practices (4 works) · Community Development and Social Impact (4 works) · Engineering (4 works) · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (4 works) · Livelihood (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae