Tijs Kooijmans
Biographic Data
| ID | 5656814 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Tijs Kooijmans |
| GIVEN NAMES | Tijs |
| FAMILY NAME | Kooijmans |
| SIGNATURE | KOOIJMANS T |
| AFFILIATIONS | Tilburg University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2008 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Closed-Loop Brain Devices in Offender Rehabilitation
The current debate on closed-loop brain devices (CBDs) mainly focuses on their use in a medical context; possible criminal justice applications have only received incidental scholarly attention. Unlike in medicine, in criminal justice, CBDs might be offered on behalf of the State and for the purpose of protecting security, rather than realizing healthcare aims. It would be possible to deploy CBDs in the rehabilitation of convicted offenders, simi…
Who Establishes the Presence of a Mental Disorder in Defendants? Medicolegal Considerations on a European Court of Human Rights Case
Legal insanity is a peculiar element of criminal law, because it brings together two very different disciplines: psychiatry and psychology on the one hand and the law on the other. One of the basic questions regarding evaluations of defendants concerns the question of who should establish "true mental disorder," the judge or the behavioral expert? This question is complicated, and in this contribution it will be explored based on a Dutch case tha…
Divided Minds in the Lubanga Trial Judgment
The concept of co-perpetration and its proper construction continues to be a topic that causes controversy and fragmentation in the field of international criminal law. The latest proof of this is the Lubanga Trial Judgment in which the three judges disagreed on whether this mode of liability should be based on the theory of joint control over the crime. The present article examines and further develops Judge Fulford’s arguments against the adopt…
The Burden of Proof in Confiscation Cases
The Burden of Proof in Confiscation Cases: A Comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the Light of the European Convention of Human Rights" published on 01 Jan 2010 by Brill | Nijhoff
The Scope of the Community's Competence in the Field of Criminal Law
On 13 September 2005, the Court of Justice of the European Communities (hereafter: Court of Justice EC) passed a judgment giving rise to much controversy.1 In that judgment, the Court found that in some situations, the EC Treaty leaves room to take measures in a directive “which relate to the criminal law of the Member States” (para. 48). The authority to take criminal law measures in the First Pillar exists – concisely stated – if these measures…
No prominent works on this page.
The Scope of the Community's Competence in the Field of Criminal Law
On 13 September 2005, the Court of Justice of the European Communities (hereafter: Court of Justice EC) passed a judgment giving rise to much controversy.1 In that judgment, the Court found that in some situations, the EC Treaty leaves room to take measures in a directive “which relate to the criminal law of the Member States” (para. 48). The authority to take criminal law measures in the First Pillar exists – concisely stated – if these measures…
The Burden of Proof in Confiscation Cases
The Burden of Proof in Confiscation Cases: A Comparison between the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the Light of the European Convention of Human Rights" published on 01 Jan 2010 by Brill | Nijhoff
Divided Minds in the Lubanga Trial Judgment
The concept of co-perpetration and its proper construction continues to be a topic that causes controversy and fragmentation in the field of international criminal law. The latest proof of this is the Lubanga Trial Judgment in which the three judges disagreed on whether this mode of liability should be based on the theory of joint control over the crime. The present article examines and further develops Judge Fulford’s arguments against the adopt…
Who Establishes the Presence of a Mental Disorder in Defendants? Medicolegal Considerations on a European Court of Human Rights Case
Legal insanity is a peculiar element of criminal law, because it brings together two very different disciplines: psychiatry and psychology on the one hand and the law on the other. One of the basic questions regarding evaluations of defendants concerns the question of who should establish "true mental disorder," the judge or the behavioral expert? This question is complicated, and in this contribution it will be explored based on a Dutch case tha…
Closed-Loop Brain Devices in Offender Rehabilitation
The current debate on closed-loop brain devices (CBDs) mainly focuses on their use in a medical context; possible criminal justice applications have only received incidental scholarly attention. Unlike in medicine, in criminal justice, CBDs might be offered on behalf of the State and for the purpose of protecting security, rather than realizing healthcare aims. It would be possible to deploy CBDs in the rehabilitation of convicted offenders, simi…
Law (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Law (4 works) · Human rights (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Business (2 works) · Criminology (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Accountability (1 works)