Joeri K Tijdink

Biographic Data

ID5679057
NAMEJoeri K Tijdink
GIVEN NAMESJoeri K
FAMILY NAMETijdink
SIGNATURETIJDINK J K
AFFILIATIONSAmsterdam University Medical Centers
ORCID0000-0002-1826-2274
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS14
TOTAL CITATIONS13
AUTHOR COUNT14
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2014
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX2

  • When gratitude and social support make the difference: Buffering the impact of parental role restriction on maternal burnout

    Open AccessFitri Ariyanti Abidin, Vidya Anindhita et al.ARTICLEActa Psychologica2025References: 2

    Parental burnout is a chronic exhaustion resulting from an imbalance between the demands of parenting and available resources. This condition disproportionately affects mothers and is recognized globally as a serious mental health issue, with significant implications for maternal well-being, spousal relationships, parenting quality, and children's mental health. Despite increasing research on parental burnout, most studies have focused on its ant…

  • Can moral case deliberation in research groups help to navigate research integrity dilemmas? A pilot study

    Open AccessTamarinde L Haven, Bert C Molewijk et al.ARTICLEResearch Ethics2024

    There is an increased focus on fostering integrity in research by through creating an open culture where research integrity dilemmas can be discussed. We describe a pilot intervention study that used Moral Case Deliberation (MCD), a method that originated in clinical ethics support, to discuss research integrity dilemmas with researchers. Our research question was: can moral case deliberation in research groups help to navigate research integrity…

  • Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions

    Open AccessKrishma Labib, Natalie Evans et al.ARTICLEScience and Engineering Ethics2023

    To foster research integrity (RI), research institutions should develop a continuous RI education approach, addressing various target groups. To support institutions to achieve this, we developed RI education guidelines together with RI experts and research administrators, exploring similarities and differences in recommendations across target groups, as well as recommendations about RI education using approaches other than formal RI training. We…

  • Social context factors influence basic psychological need satisfaction; a cross-sectional survey among Indonesian adolescents

    Open AccessFitri Ariyanti Abidin, Joeri K Tijdink et al.ARTICLECurrent Psychology2023

  • Suicidal attempts and ideations in Kenyan adults with psychotic disorders: An observational study of frequency and associated risk factors

    Open AccessLinnet Ongeri, Symon M Kariuki et al.ARTICLEFrontiers in Psychiatry2023

    Suicidal ideation and SB are common in persons with psychotic disorders in this African setting and are associated with sociodemographic factors, such as young age and unemployment, and clinical factors, such as family history of suicidality. Interventions targeted at the community (e.g., economic empowerment) or at increasing access to care and treatment for persons with psychotic disorders may reduce the risk of suicide in this vulnerable popul…

  • Strengthening research integrity: Which topic areas should organisations focus on

    Open AccessMads P Sørensen, Tine Ravn et al.ARTICLEHumanities and Social Sciences…2021

    The widespread problems with scientific fraud, questionable research practices, and the reliability of scientific results have led to an increased focus on research integrity (RI). International organisations and networks have been established, declarations have been issued, and codes of conducts have been formed. The abstract principles of these documents are now also being translated into concrete topic areas that Research Performing organisati…

  • Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review

    Open AccessRea Roje, Rea Ščepanović et al.ARTICLEScience and Engineering Ethics2021

    Research integrity (RI) is a continuously developing concept, and increasing emphasis is put on creating RI promotion practices. This study aimed to map the existing RI guidance documents at research performing organisations (RPOs) and research funding organisations (RFOs). A search of bibliographic databases and grey literature sources was performed, and retrieved documents were screened for eligibility. The search of bibliographical databases a…

  • Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study

    Open AccessKrishma Labib, Rea Roje et al.ARTICLEScience and Engineering Ethics2021

    To foster research integrity (RI), it is necessary to address the institutional and system-of-science factors that influence researchers’ behavior. Consequently, research performing and research funding organizations (RPOs and RFOs) could develop comprehensive RI policies outlining the concrete steps they will take to foster RI. So far, there is no consensus on which topics are important to address in RI policies. Therefore, we conducted a three …

  • Expanding Research Integrity: A Cultural-Practice Perspective

    Open AccessG Valkenburg, Guus Dix et al.ARTICLEScience and Engineering Ethics2021

    Research integrity (RI) is usually discussed in terms of responsibilities that individual researchers bear towards the scientific work they conduct, as well as responsibilities that institutions have to enable those individual researchers to do so. In addition to these two bearers of responsibility, a third category often surfaces, which is variably referred to as culture and practice . These notions merit further development beyond a residual ca…

  • Towards a Research Agenda for Promoting Responsible Research Practices

    Open AccessJoeri K Tijdink, Serge P J M Horbach et al.ARTICLEJournal of Empirical Research on…2021Cited by: 3References: 1

    This opinion piece aims to inform future research funding programs on responsible research practices (RRP) based on three specific objectives: (1) to give a sketch of the current international discussion on responsible research practices (RRPs); (2) to give an overview of current initiatives and already obtained results regarding RRP; and (3) to give an overview of potential future needs for research on RRP. In this opinion piece, we have used se…

  • Researchers’ Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group Study

    Open AccessTamarinde L Haven, H Roeline Pasman et al.ARTICLEScience and Engineering Ethics2020

    The research climate plays a key role in fostering integrity in research. However, little is known about what constitutes a responsible research climate. We investigated academic researchers’ perceptions on this through focus group interviews. We recruited researchers from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and the Amsterdam University Medical Center to participate in focus group discussions that consisted of researchers from similar academic ranks…

  • Algorithmic Allocation: Untangling Rival Considerations of Fairness in Research Management

    Open AccessGuus Dix, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner et al.ARTICLEPolitics and Governance2020References: 10

    Marketization and quantification have become ingrained in academia over the past few decades. The trust in numbers and incentives has led to a proliferation of devices that individualize, induce, benchmark, and rank academic performance. As an instantiation of that trend, this article focuses on the establishment and contestation of ‘algorithmic allocation’ at a Dutch university medical centre. Algorithmic allocation is a form of data-driven auto…

  • The assessment of publication pressure in medical science; validity and reliability of a Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ)

    Open AccessJoeri K Tijdink, Yvo M Smulders et al.ARTICLEQuality of Life Research2014

  • Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists

    Open AccessJoeri K Tijdink, Reinout Verbeke et al.ARTICLEJournal of Empirical Research on…2014Cited by: 10References: 1

    There is increasing evidence that scientific misconduct is more common than previously thought. Strong emphasis on scientific productivity may increase the sense of publication pressure. We administered a nationwide survey to Flemish biomedical scientists on whether they had engaged in scientific misconduct and whether they had experienced publication pressure. A total of 315 scientists participated in the survey; 15% of the respondents admitted …