Joseph Kruzel
Biographic Data
| ID | 5684741 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Joseph Kruzel |
| GIVEN NAMES | Joseph |
| FAMILY NAME | Kruzel |
| SIGNATURE | KRUZEL J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Duke University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 12 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 30 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 12 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1978 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1994 |
| H-INDEX | 4 |
More a Chasm Than a Gap, but Do Scholars Want to Bridge It?
More a Chasm Than a Gap, But Do Scholars Want to Bridge It? Get access Joseph Kruzel Joseph Kruzel European and NATO Policy, U.S. Department of Defense On leave from the Department of Political Science, The Ohio State University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Mershon International Studies Review, Volume 38, Issue Supplement_1, April 1994, Pages 179–181, https://doi.org/10.2307/222637 Published: 01 April 1…
Activities and Appointments
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button
Rethinking America's Security
Between the Blocs
Between the Blocs
Making Defense Reform Work
The European neutrals, national defense, and international security
The strategic locations, defense postures, and positions as political alternatives to the two superpowers cast the nine neutral and nonaligned European states in important roles regarding European security. This paper examines the attitudes of the United States and the Soviet Union toward the Euro‐neutrals and reviews their strategic significance for the two superpowers. The author states four propositions on which he bases a generic approach to …
New challenges for Swedish security policy
What's Wrong with the Traditional Approach
Additional informationNotes on contributorsJoseph KruzelJoseph Kruzel is associate professor of political science and senior faculty associate of the Mershon Center, Ohio State University. He was formerly assistant to the secretary of defense for Salt II. He is a member of the CSIS Strategy and Arms Control Group
American Defense Annual
Hinckley examines the effect of public opinion upon foreign policy, influencing, as it does, many vital issues including changing US-Soviet relations, arms control and SDI, terrorism, and the MIddle East. He calls for more attention to be paid to the measurement of public opinion. He reveals that the current popular theories, which argue either that the public is ignorant and cannot be expected to hold serious opinions on policy matters or, alter…
Nuclear Strategy in a Dynamic World
Controlling Future Arms Trade
Between the Blocs
Between the Blocs
American Defense Annual
Hinckley examines the effect of public opinion upon foreign policy, influencing, as it does, many vital issues including changing US-Soviet relations, arms control and SDI, terrorism, and the MIddle East. He calls for more attention to be paid to the measurement of public opinion. He reveals that the current popular theories, which argue either that the public is ignorant and cannot be expected to hold serious opinions on policy matters or, alter…
Rethinking America's Security
Making Defense Reform Work
Controlling Future Arms Trade
New challenges for Swedish security policy
Nuclear Strategy in a Dynamic World
Controlling Future Arms Trade
Nuclear Strategy in a Dynamic World
What's Wrong with the Traditional Approach
Additional informationNotes on contributorsJoseph KruzelJoseph Kruzel is associate professor of political science and senior faculty associate of the Mershon Center, Ohio State University. He was formerly assistant to the secretary of defense for Salt II. He is a member of the CSIS Strategy and Arms Control Group
American Defense Annual
Hinckley examines the effect of public opinion upon foreign policy, influencing, as it does, many vital issues including changing US-Soviet relations, arms control and SDI, terrorism, and the MIddle East. He calls for more attention to be paid to the measurement of public opinion. He reveals that the current popular theories, which argue either that the public is ignorant and cannot be expected to hold serious opinions on policy matters or, alter…
New challenges for Swedish security policy
The European neutrals, national defense, and international security
The strategic locations, defense postures, and positions as political alternatives to the two superpowers cast the nine neutral and nonaligned European states in important roles regarding European security. This paper examines the attitudes of the United States and the Soviet Union toward the Euro‐neutrals and reviews their strategic significance for the two superpowers. The author states four propositions on which he bases a generic approach to …
Between the Blocs
Making Defense Reform Work
Between the Blocs
Rethinking America's Security
Activities and Appointments
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button
More a Chasm Than a Gap, but Do Scholars Want to Bridge It?
More a Chasm Than a Gap, But Do Scholars Want to Bridge It? Get access Joseph Kruzel Joseph Kruzel European and NATO Policy, U.S. Department of Defense On leave from the Department of Political Science, The Ohio State University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Mershon International Studies Review, Volume 38, Issue Supplement_1, April 1994, Pages 179–181, https://doi.org/10.2307/222637 Published: 01 April 1…
Political science (11 works) · Economics (6 works) · Computer Science (5 works) · European Politics and Security (4 works) · International trade (4 works) · Public Administration (4 works) · Public Administration (4 works) · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies (3 works) · European Union Policy and Governance (3 works) · Law (3 works)