Farrokh Jhabvala
Biographic Data
| ID | 5698317 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Farrokh Jhabvala |
| GIVEN NAMES | Farrokh |
| FAMILY NAME | Jhabvala |
| SIGNATURE | JHABVALA F |
| AFFILIATIONS | Florida International University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 4 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1978 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1985 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The Soviet-Bloc's View of the Implementation of Human Rights Accords
That governments ought to be internationally accountable for the way they treat individuals under their jurisdiction has been one of the most fundamental assumptions of the post-World War 11 effort to promote and protect human rights. Events immediately before and during World War 11 demonstrated how governments may manipulate their own laws and thereby undertake actions of unspeakably heinous proportions. This experience precipitated the post-wa…
The Practice of the Covenant's Human Rights Committee, 1976-82
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights was adopted by the General Assembly on 16 December 1966 and opened three days later for signature by states.' About nine years later the last of the thirty-five ratifications or accessions necessary for the Covenant to enter into force was received by the United Nations secretary general in his role as depositary for the treaty, and the instrument entered into force on 23 March 1976.2 This …
Individual Opinions Under the New Rules of Court
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Declarations by Judges of the International Court of Justice
Judges of the International Court of Justice have a variety of vehicles through which they may express their judicial opinions. There are, in the first place, the judgments and opinions of the Court—results of the collegial deliberations—to which every judge may contribute. If, however, the judgment or opinion of the Court does not represent “in whole or in part the unanimous opinion of the judges, any judge shall be entitled to deliver a separat…
Declarations by Judges of the International Court of Justice
Judges of the International Court of Justice have a variety of vehicles through which they may express their judicial opinions. There are, in the first place, the judgments and opinions of the Court—results of the collegial deliberations—to which every judge may contribute. If, however, the judgment or opinion of the Court does not represent “in whole or in part the unanimous opinion of the judges, any judge shall be entitled to deliver a separat…
The Practice of the Covenant's Human Rights Committee, 1976-82
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights was adopted by the General Assembly on 16 December 1966 and opened three days later for signature by states.' About nine years later the last of the thirty-five ratifications or accessions necessary for the Covenant to enter into force was received by the United Nations secretary general in his role as depositary for the treaty, and the instrument entered into force on 23 March 1976.2 This …
Individual Opinions Under the New Rules of Court
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Declarations by Judges of the International Court of Justice
Judges of the International Court of Justice have a variety of vehicles through which they may express their judicial opinions. There are, in the first place, the judgments and opinions of the Court—results of the collegial deliberations—to which every judge may contribute. If, however, the judgment or opinion of the Court does not represent “in whole or in part the unanimous opinion of the judges, any judge shall be entitled to deliver a separat…
Individual Opinions Under the New Rules of Court
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
The Practice of the Covenant's Human Rights Committee, 1976-82
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights was adopted by the General Assembly on 16 December 1966 and opened three days later for signature by states.' About nine years later the last of the thirty-five ratifications or accessions necessary for the Covenant to enter into force was received by the United Nations secretary general in his role as depositary for the treaty, and the instrument entered into force on 23 March 1976.2 This …
The Soviet-Bloc's View of the Implementation of Human Rights Accords
That governments ought to be internationally accountable for the way they treat individuals under their jurisdiction has been one of the most fundamental assumptions of the post-World War 11 effort to promote and protect human rights. Events immediately before and during World War 11 demonstrated how governments may manipulate their own laws and thereby undertake actions of unspeakably heinous proportions. This experience precipitated the post-wa…
Law (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · International Law and Human Rights (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 works) · Human rights (2 works) · Advisory opinion (1 works) · Concurrence (1 works) · Concurring opinion (1 works)