Riccardo Pavoni
Biographic Data
| ID | 5698481 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Riccardo Pavoni |
| GIVEN NAMES | Riccardo |
| FAMILY NAME | Pavoni |
| SIGNATURE | PAVONI R |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Siena |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 7 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1999 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Stergiopoulos v. Iran. Order No. 39391/2021. 105 Rivista di diritto internazionale 620 (2022)
In Angela Stergiopoulos v. Iran, the Italian Supreme Court of Cassation held that state immunity does not bar exequatur proceedings against a foreign state when those proceedings seek the recognition and enforcement of a foreign judicial decision finding the state responsible for serious breaches of human rights. 1 Order 39391/2021 stems from the mass litigation by victims of the September 11 terrorist attack before the U.S. District Court for th…
How Broad is the Principle Upheld by the Italian Constitutional Court in Judgment No. 238
The present article discusses the breadth of the principle upheld by the Italian Constitutional Court in Judgment No. 238 of 2014, concerning the unconstitutionality of grants of foreign state immunity over international crimes and comparable grave breaches of human rights. This article takes the view that two — and only two — requirements qualify that principle: first, the commission of an international crime by state agents; and second, the una…
Simoncioni v. Germany
With Judgment No. 238/2014, the Italian Constitutional Court (hereinafter Court) quashed the Italian legislation setting out the obligation to comply with the sections of the 2012 decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy; Greece intervening) (Jurisdictional Immunities or Germany v. Italy) that uphold the rule of sovereign immunity with respect to compensation claims in Italia…
Mutual Supportiveness as a Principle of Interpretation and Law-Making: A Watershed for the 'WTO-and-Competing-Regimes' Debate
This article focuses on the principle of mutual supportiveness as a key legal tool to address tensions between competing regimes, with specific reference to the articulation of the WTO system with other subject areas protecting essential interests of the international community, such as in particular the right to health, cultural diversity, and environmental protection. It argues that the multiple references to mutual supportiveness found in rece…
Un Sanctions In Eu and National Law: The Centro-Com Case
International sanctions, understood as coercive means imposed by the United Nations, or by States, individually or collectively, against a country responsible for violating fundamental rules of international law, have been extensively analysed in the legal literature.1 A survey of such literature shows that particular emphasis has been put on the nature of sanctions, their status in international law and the very controversial issue of the legali…
Mutual Supportiveness as a Principle of Interpretation and Law-Making: A Watershed for the 'WTO-and-Competing-Regimes' Debate
This article focuses on the principle of mutual supportiveness as a key legal tool to address tensions between competing regimes, with specific reference to the articulation of the WTO system with other subject areas protecting essential interests of the international community, such as in particular the right to health, cultural diversity, and environmental protection. It argues that the multiple references to mutual supportiveness found in rece…
Simoncioni v. Germany
With Judgment No. 238/2014, the Italian Constitutional Court (hereinafter Court) quashed the Italian legislation setting out the obligation to comply with the sections of the 2012 decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy; Greece intervening) (Jurisdictional Immunities or Germany v. Italy) that uphold the rule of sovereign immunity with respect to compensation claims in Italia…
Un Sanctions In Eu and National Law: The Centro-Com Case
International sanctions, understood as coercive means imposed by the United Nations, or by States, individually or collectively, against a country responsible for violating fundamental rules of international law, have been extensively analysed in the legal literature.1 A survey of such literature shows that particular emphasis has been put on the nature of sanctions, their status in international law and the very controversial issue of the legali…
Un Sanctions In Eu and National Law: The Centro-Com Case
International sanctions, understood as coercive means imposed by the United Nations, or by States, individually or collectively, against a country responsible for violating fundamental rules of international law, have been extensively analysed in the legal literature.1 A survey of such literature shows that particular emphasis has been put on the nature of sanctions, their status in international law and the very controversial issue of the legali…
Mutual Supportiveness as a Principle of Interpretation and Law-Making: A Watershed for the 'WTO-and-Competing-Regimes' Debate
This article focuses on the principle of mutual supportiveness as a key legal tool to address tensions between competing regimes, with specific reference to the articulation of the WTO system with other subject areas protecting essential interests of the international community, such as in particular the right to health, cultural diversity, and environmental protection. It argues that the multiple references to mutual supportiveness found in rece…
Simoncioni v. Germany
With Judgment No. 238/2014, the Italian Constitutional Court (hereinafter Court) quashed the Italian legislation setting out the obligation to comply with the sections of the 2012 decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy; Greece intervening) (Jurisdictional Immunities or Germany v. Italy) that uphold the rule of sovereign immunity with respect to compensation claims in Italia…
How Broad is the Principle Upheld by the Italian Constitutional Court in Judgment No. 238
The present article discusses the breadth of the principle upheld by the Italian Constitutional Court in Judgment No. 238 of 2014, concerning the unconstitutionality of grants of foreign state immunity over international crimes and comparable grave breaches of human rights. This article takes the view that two — and only two — requirements qualify that principle: first, the commission of an international crime by state agents; and second, the una…
Stergiopoulos v. Iran. Order No. 39391/2021. 105 Rivista di diritto internazionale 620 (2022)
In Angela Stergiopoulos v. Iran, the Italian Supreme Court of Cassation held that state immunity does not bar exequatur proceedings against a foreign state when those proceedings seek the recognition and enforcement of a foreign judicial decision finding the state responsible for serious breaches of human rights. 1 Order 39391/2021 stems from the mass litigation by victims of the September 11 terrorist attack before the U.S. District Court for th…
Political science (5 works) · International law (4 works) · Law (4 works) · European and International Law Studies (3 works) · State (computer science (3 works) · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (2 works) · Human rights (2 works) · International Arbitration and Investment Law (2 works) · Jurisdiction (2 works) · Law (2 works)