PETER McEWEN
Biographic Data
| ID | 5710204 |
|---|---|
| NAME | PETER McEWEN |
| GIVEN NAMES | PETER |
| FAMILY NAME | McEWEN |
| SIGNATURE | MCEWEN P |
| AFFILIATIONS | Queen's University Belfast |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1959 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1960 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Some Individual Differences in Figural After‐effects
Three different hypotheses have been proposed to account for individual differences in figural after‐effects (Klein & Krech, 1952; Wertheimer & Wertheimer, 1954; Eysenck, 1955). Each implies the existence of a positive correlation between the measures of after‐effect in different modalities. The study reported here explored this problem for vision and kinaesthesis. Thirty‐two subjects were used and no significant correlation was found (α = 0·05).…
Figural After‐effects, Retinal Size and Apparent Size
Previous work has established that figural after‐effects are determined by the retinal size of the inspection figure, but Sutherland (1954) has argued that the methods used were based on the assumption that retinal and apparent sizes cannot both be determinants. He himself has provided evidence of the effects of apparent size. The present paper reports an experiment intended to confirm Sutherland's findings and to measure the magnitude of the aft…
No prominent works on this page.
Figural After‐effects, Retinal Size and Apparent Size
Previous work has established that figural after‐effects are determined by the retinal size of the inspection figure, but Sutherland (1954) has argued that the methods used were based on the assumption that retinal and apparent sizes cannot both be determinants. He himself has provided evidence of the effects of apparent size. The present paper reports an experiment intended to confirm Sutherland's findings and to measure the magnitude of the aft…
Some Individual Differences in Figural After‐effects
Three different hypotheses have been proposed to account for individual differences in figural after‐effects (Klein & Krech, 1952; Wertheimer & Wertheimer, 1954; Eysenck, 1955). Each implies the existence of a positive correlation between the measures of after‐effect in different modalities. The study reported here explored this problem for vision and kinaesthesis. Thirty‐two subjects were used and no significant correlation was found (α = 0·05).…
Mathematics (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 works) · Apparent Size (1 work) · Audiology (1 work) · Big Five personality traits (1 work) · Cognitive psychology (1 work) · Color perception and design (1 work) · Correlation (1 work) · Demography (1 work)