A S Henry
Biographic Data
| ID | 5716848 |
|---|---|
| NAME | A S Henry |
| GIVEN NAMES | A S |
| FAMILY NAME | Henry |
| SIGNATURE | HENRY A S |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of New England |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1964 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1970 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Some Notes on the Syntax of the Prose Inscriptions of Hellenistic Athens
A. Agreement of Participle (1) Masculine takes precedence over feminine: e.g. In the first two examples (for which see also II. A. 2 below) the participle may be conceived of as agreeing with the nearer of the two subjects, since it is expressed in the masculine singular. Likewise, refers specifically to . But the third example, in which the participle is in the masculine plural, clearly demonstrates the usual preference for masculine
Notes on The Language of The Prose Inscriptions of Hellenistic Athens
Features of the older Attic alphabet, which was officially replaced by the Ionic alphabet in the archonship of Eukleides, are still found sporadically in the Hellenistic period, although some cases are most probably explicable on grounds of analogy: ∈ written for 1324. 26. U (in. s. ii?)2 This perhaps shows the influence of the noun
Some Observations on Final Clauses in Hellenistic Attic Prose Inscriptions
I Begin with quotations from two authoritative works, both of which require modification in the light of the evidence which I have assembled concerning the language of the inscriptions of Attica of the period 323–146 B.C. These quotations are: (a) LSJ s.v. B: ‘in early Attic inscriptions only is used ...; without only once in cent, iv B.C., IG 2 2 . 226. 42 (343 B.C.), after which it becomes gradually prevalent.’ This is very near the truth. (b) …
Sophocles, Oedipvs Tyrannvs 876–877
I print the text as given in Pearson. I agree with Jebb and Sheppard that the strophe is sound, and therefore I would retain at 866–7. The problem now lies with the antistrophe, where with the manuscript reading at 877 we lack either or-to give proper responsion with 867. The manuscript text can be vindicated if we detect that simplest of scribal errors, haplography. Thus for 876–7 I would read
Epigraphica
One of the clearest phonological developments of the language of Attic inscriptions of the Hellenistic period down to the end of the second century B.C. is the change . I have studied this phenomenon with particular reference to the period 323–146 B.C., taking into account also the trends before 323 (i.e. between 403 and 323) and after 146 B.C. down to the end of the pre- Christian era. The object of this article is to draw attention to the fact …
No prominent works on this page.
Epigraphica
One of the clearest phonological developments of the language of Attic inscriptions of the Hellenistic period down to the end of the second century B.C. is the change . I have studied this phenomenon with particular reference to the period 323–146 B.C., taking into account also the trends before 323 (i.e. between 403 and 323) and after 146 B.C. down to the end of the pre- Christian era. The object of this article is to draw attention to the fact …
Sophocles, Oedipvs Tyrannvs 876–877
I print the text as given in Pearson. I agree with Jebb and Sheppard that the strophe is sound, and therefore I would retain at 866–7. The problem now lies with the antistrophe, where with the manuscript reading at 877 we lack either or-to give proper responsion with 867. The manuscript text can be vindicated if we detect that simplest of scribal errors, haplography. Thus for 876–7 I would read
Some Observations on Final Clauses in Hellenistic Attic Prose Inscriptions
I Begin with quotations from two authoritative works, both of which require modification in the light of the evidence which I have assembled concerning the language of the inscriptions of Attica of the period 323–146 B.C. These quotations are: (a) LSJ s.v. B: ‘in early Attic inscriptions only is used ...; without only once in cent, iv B.C., IG 2 2 . 226. 42 (343 B.C.), after which it becomes gradually prevalent.’ This is very near the truth. (b) …
Notes on The Language of The Prose Inscriptions of Hellenistic Athens
Features of the older Attic alphabet, which was officially replaced by the Ionic alphabet in the archonship of Eukleides, are still found sporadically in the Hellenistic period, although some cases are most probably explicable on grounds of analogy: ∈ written for 1324. 26. U (in. s. ii?)2 This perhaps shows the influence of the noun
Some Notes on the Syntax of the Prose Inscriptions of Hellenistic Athens
A. Agreement of Participle (1) Masculine takes precedence over feminine: e.g. In the first two examples (for which see also II. A. 2 below) the participle may be conceived of as agreeing with the nearer of the two subjects, since it is expressed in the masculine singular. Likewise, refers specifically to . But the third example, in which the participle is in the masculine plural, clearly demonstrates the usual preference for masculine
Art (5 works) · Classical Antiquity Studies (5 works) · Literature (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · History (4 works) · History (4 works) · Linguistics (4 works) · Ancient Near East History (3 works) · Linguistics and language evolution (3 works)