David L Mouton
Biographic Data
| ID | 5722979 |
|---|---|
| NAME | David L Mouton |
| GIVEN NAMES | David L |
| FAMILY NAME | Mouton |
| SIGNATURE | MOUTON D L |
| AFFILIATIONS | Roosevelt University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1972 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1974 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
On the "Geach-Mouton Line"
On the “Geach-Mouton Line” : A Reply to Farrell Get access David L. Mouton David L. Mouton Roosevelt University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 24, Issue 94, January 1974, Pages 69–70, https://doi.org/10.2307/2218286 Published: 01 January 1974
Hume and Descartes On Self-Acquaintance
The idea of self-knowledge divides naturally into two parts in accordance with the distinction between knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. I know myself and I know things about myself. The latter I know partly from self-acquaintance, partly from the behavior, especially linguistic, of others, and partly from each of these. All aspects of self-knowledge are controversial, so I shall concentrate in this paper on the question of …
Physicalism and Immortality
To many it seems obvious that any reduction of the nature of man to purely physical components involves an (at least) indirect attack on the doctrine of human immortality. To so reduce human nature, it may be argued, is to eliminate the soul and it is this essential component of man, rather than his body, which is the foundation of his immortality. This seems to me an altogether mistaken notion. My purpose in this paper, therefore, is to clarify …
No prominent works on this page.
Physicalism and Immortality
To many it seems obvious that any reduction of the nature of man to purely physical components involves an (at least) indirect attack on the doctrine of human immortality. To so reduce human nature, it may be argued, is to eliminate the soul and it is this essential component of man, rather than his body, which is the foundation of his immortality. This seems to me an altogether mistaken notion. My purpose in this paper, therefore, is to clarify …
On the "Geach-Mouton Line"
On the “Geach-Mouton Line” : A Reply to Farrell Get access David L. Mouton David L. Mouton Roosevelt University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 24, Issue 94, January 1974, Pages 69–70, https://doi.org/10.2307/2218286 Published: 01 January 1974
Hume and Descartes On Self-Acquaintance
The idea of self-knowledge divides naturally into two parts in accordance with the distinction between knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. I know myself and I know things about myself. The latter I know partly from self-acquaintance, partly from the behavior, especially linguistic, of others, and partly from each of these. All aspects of self-knowledge are controversial, so I shall concentrate in this paper on the question of …
Philosophy (3 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 works) · Metaphysics (2 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 works) · Physicalism (2 works) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 work) · Denial (1 work) · Doctrine (1 work) · Empiricism (1 work)