Junyeol Kim
Biographic Data
| ID | 5723528 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Junyeol Kim |
| GIVEN NAMES | Junyeol |
| FAMILY NAME | Kim |
| SIGNATURE | KIM J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Kookmin University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9802-8815 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 8 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2016 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Frege on the Task of Logic
It is hardly controversial to say that it is the task of logic to justify its laws. Frege appears to accept this idea—especially when he offers arguments for the truth of the basic laws in his Begriffsschrift . Yet Frege argues that logic cannot justify its basic laws—and hence, cannot justify any of its laws. This paper aims to resolve this apparent tension. I argue that, for Frege, the task of logic is not to justify its laws, but to determine …
Frege on Logical Laws and Judgement
The Strong Normative Constitutivity reading of logical laws in Frege argues that although he regards logical laws as purely descriptive, he in fact accepts that they are normatively constitutive of the act of judgement. There are passages in which Frege seems to commit himself to such an idea. However, we can understand what Frege argues in those passages based only on his conception of logical laws as the most general descriptive laws and his ob…
Is Frege a Neo-Kantian Transcendentalist About the Justification for Logical Axioms
The neo-Kantian transcendentalist reading of the epistemic status of logical axioms in Frege argues that he is committed to the neo-Kantian idea that we are epistemically justified in accepting logical axioms because accepting them is necessary for achieving epistemically crucial goals. However, I show that Frege hesitates to be fully committed to neo-Kantian transcendentalism because he struggles to accept the idea that such a teleological reaso…
Democracy and Epistemic Fairness
The current discussion on the relationship of epistemic justice to democracy focuses on its relationship to deliberative democracy. This article concerns the relationship of epistemic justice—specifically, testimonial justice which I call “epistemic fairness”—to aggregative democracy or democracy by voting. The aim of this article is to establish that in a good theory of democracy, epistemic fairness is one of the founding principles of the democ…
Does Frege Have a Metalinguistic Truth-Predicate in Begriffsschrift
In the explanations of logical laws and inference rules of the mature version of Begriffsschrift in Grundgesetze , Frege uses the predicate “... is the True.” Scholars like Greimann maintain that this predicate is a metalinguistic truth-predicate for Frege. This paper examines an argument for this claim that is based on the “nominal reading” of Frege’s conception of sentences—the claim that for Frege a sentence “ $ p $ ” is equivalent to a nonsen…
Frege's Conception of Logic
Gottlob Frege takes logic to be the science of truth throughout his career. However, the mature Frege makes remarks which seem to go against the idea that logic is the science of truth. This paper shows that we can explain away this tension in the mature Frege's conception of logic if we accept that truth is an object, that is, the truth‐vale True qua the reference of a sentence, for Frege. Even though the main thesis of this paper is a condition…
The horizontal in Frege’s Begriffsschrift
Social Science/Natural Science Perspectives on Wildfire and Climate Change
In western North America, wildfire is a critical component of many ecosystems and a natural hazard that can result in catastrophic losses of human lives and property. Billions of dollars are spent suppressing wildfires each year. In the past decades, academic research has made substantial contributions to the understanding of fire and its interaction with climate and land management. Most reviews of the academic literature, however, are centered …
No prominent works on this page.
Social Science/Natural Science Perspectives on Wildfire and Climate Change
In western North America, wildfire is a critical component of many ecosystems and a natural hazard that can result in catastrophic losses of human lives and property. Billions of dollars are spent suppressing wildfires each year. In the past decades, academic research has made substantial contributions to the understanding of fire and its interaction with climate and land management. Most reviews of the academic literature, however, are centered …
Does Frege Have a Metalinguistic Truth-Predicate in Begriffsschrift
In the explanations of logical laws and inference rules of the mature version of Begriffsschrift in Grundgesetze , Frege uses the predicate “... is the True.” Scholars like Greimann maintain that this predicate is a metalinguistic truth-predicate for Frege. This paper examines an argument for this claim that is based on the “nominal reading” of Frege’s conception of sentences—the claim that for Frege a sentence “ $ p $ ” is equivalent to a nonsen…
Frege's Conception of Logic
Gottlob Frege takes logic to be the science of truth throughout his career. However, the mature Frege makes remarks which seem to go against the idea that logic is the science of truth. This paper shows that we can explain away this tension in the mature Frege's conception of logic if we accept that truth is an object, that is, the truth‐vale True qua the reference of a sentence, for Frege. Even though the main thesis of this paper is a condition…
The horizontal in Frege’s Begriffsschrift
Democracy and Epistemic Fairness
The current discussion on the relationship of epistemic justice to democracy focuses on its relationship to deliberative democracy. This article concerns the relationship of epistemic justice—specifically, testimonial justice which I call “epistemic fairness”—to aggregative democracy or democracy by voting. The aim of this article is to establish that in a good theory of democracy, epistemic fairness is one of the founding principles of the democ…
Is Frege a Neo-Kantian Transcendentalist About the Justification for Logical Axioms
The neo-Kantian transcendentalist reading of the epistemic status of logical axioms in Frege argues that he is committed to the neo-Kantian idea that we are epistemically justified in accepting logical axioms because accepting them is necessary for achieving epistemically crucial goals. However, I show that Frege hesitates to be fully committed to neo-Kantian transcendentalism because he struggles to accept the idea that such a teleological reaso…
Frege on Logical Laws and Judgement
The Strong Normative Constitutivity reading of logical laws in Frege argues that although he regards logical laws as purely descriptive, he in fact accepts that they are normatively constitutive of the act of judgement. There are passages in which Frege seems to commit himself to such an idea. However, we can understand what Frege argues in those passages based only on his conception of logical laws as the most general descriptive laws and his ob…
Frege on the Task of Logic
It is hardly controversial to say that it is the task of logic to justify its laws. Frege appears to accept this idea—especially when he offers arguments for the truth of the basic laws in his Begriffsschrift . Yet Frege argues that logic cannot justify its basic laws—and hence, cannot justify any of its laws. This paper aims to resolve this apparent tension. I argue that, for Frege, the task of logic is not to justify its laws, but to determine …
Epistemology (6 works) · Philosophy (6 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 works) · Philosophy, Science, and History (4 works) · Assertion (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Linguistics (3 works) · Principle of compositionality (3 works) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 works)