Nina Boberg‐Fazlić
Biographic Data
| ID | 5733376 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Nina Boberg‐Fazlić |
| GIVEN NAMES | Nina |
| FAMILY NAME | Boberg‐Fazlić |
| SIGNATURE | FAZLIĆ N B |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Duisburg-Essen |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 1 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 4 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 1 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Does Welfare Spending Crowd out Charitable Activity? Evidence from Historical England under the Poor Laws
This study examines the relationship between government spending and charitable activity. We present a novel way of testing the ‘crowding out hypothesis’, making use of the fact that welfare provision under the Old Poor Laws was decided at the parish level, thus giving heterogeneity within a single country. Using data on poor relief spending combined with data on charitable incomes by county before and after 1800, we find a positive relationship:…
Does Welfare Spending Crowd out Charitable Activity? Evidence from Historical England under the Poor Laws
This study examines the relationship between government spending and charitable activity. We present a novel way of testing the ‘crowding out hypothesis’, making use of the fact that welfare provision under the Old Poor Laws was decided at the parish level, thus giving heterogeneity within a single country. Using data on poor relief spending combined with data on charitable incomes by county before and after 1800, we find a positive relationship:…
Does Welfare Spending Crowd out Charitable Activity? Evidence from Historical England under the Poor Laws
This study examines the relationship between government spending and charitable activity. We present a novel way of testing the ‘crowding out hypothesis’, making use of the fact that welfare provision under the Old Poor Laws was decided at the parish level, thus giving heterogeneity within a single country. Using data on poor relief spending combined with data on charitable incomes by county before and after 1800, we find a positive relationship:…
Crowding out (1 works) · Economics (1 works) · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (1 works) · Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (1 works) · Keynesian economics (1 works) · Law (1 works) · Law (1 works) · Political science (1 works) · Public economics (1 works) · Religion, Society, and Development (1 works)