Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Tami Toroyan

Datos Biográficos

ID5750413
NOMBRETami Toroyan
NOMBRESTami
APELLIDOToroyan
FIRMATOROYAN T
AFILIACIONESPublic Health Intervention Research Unit at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
VERIFICADONo
TOTAL DE OBRAS1
TOTAL DE CITAS10
TOTAL COMO AUTOR1
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN2003
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN2003
ÍNDICE H1
  • Using Random Allocation to Evaluate Social Interventions

    Open Access•Ann Oakley, Vicki Strange et al.•ARTICLE•The Annals of the American…•2003•Citada por: 10•Referencias: 29

    Although widely accepted in medicine and health services research, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often viewed with hostility by social scientists, who cite a variety of reasons as to why this approach to evaluation cannot be used to research social interventions. This article discusses the three central themes in these debates, which are those of science, ethics, and feasibility. The article uses three recent U.K. trials of social inter…

  • Using Random Allocation to Evaluate Social Interventions

    Open Access•Ann Oakley, Vicki Strange et al.•ARTICLE•The Annals of the American…•2003•Citada por: 10•Referencias: 29

    Although widely accepted in medicine and health services research, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often viewed with hostility by social scientists, who cite a variety of reasons as to why this approach to evaluation cannot be used to research social interventions. This article discusses the three central themes in these debates, which are those of science, ethics, and feasibility. The article uses three recent U.K. trials of social inter…

  • Using Random Allocation to Evaluate Social Interventions

    Open Access•Ann Oakley, Vicki Strange et al.•ARTICLE•The Annals of the American…•2003•Citada por: 10•Referencias: 29

    Although widely accepted in medicine and health services research, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often viewed with hostility by social scientists, who cite a variety of reasons as to why this approach to evaluation cannot be used to research social interventions. This article discusses the three central themes in these debates, which are those of science, ethics, and feasibility. The article uses three recent U.K. trials of social inter…

Alternative medicine (1 obras) · Clinical trial (1 obras) · Disadvantaged (1 obras) · Evaluation and Performance Assessment (1 obras) · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (1 obras) · Health Policy Implementation Science (1 obras) · Hostility (1 obras) · Intervention (counseling (1 obras) · Law (1 obras) · Law (1 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae