Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

ALAN L FELD

Biographic Data

ID5752591
NAMEALAN L FELD
GIVEN NAMESALAN L
FAMILY NAMEFELD
SIGNATUREFELD A L
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS1
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1984
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1984
H-INDEX1
  • Patrons despite Themselves: Taxpayers and Arts Policy

    ALAN L FELD, Michael O’hare et al.•ARTICLE•Michigan Law Review•1984

    The authors analyze indirect subsidies, which are an important sources of support for the arts and a far larger source than direct subsidies. The authors provide a well-grounded and detailed description of how the U.S. tax system relates to the arts. They ask who pays, who benefits, who decides on the allocation, and what are the effects? The findings include a realization that the reallocation on resources that indirect subsidies induce are detr…

  • Patrons despite Themselves: Taxpayers and Arts Policy

    Open Access•Peter H Schuck, ALAN L FELD et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1984•Cited by: 1

  • Indirect Aid to the Arts

    Open Access•Michael O’hare, Michael O'Hare et al.•ARTICLE•The Annals of the American…•1984

    Most government support of arts institutions is indirect—the result of charitable deduction provisions of the federal income tax, property tax exemptions extended by local governments, and other tax provisions. The money that government forgoes through these provisions must be made up by higher taxes for all taxpayers. The public, however, has little say about how these funds are spent. By its very nature, the income tax deduction places the deci…

  • Patrons despite Themselves: Taxpayers and Arts Policy

    Open Access•Peter H Schuck, ALAN L FELD et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1984•Cited by: 1

  • Patrons despite Themselves: Taxpayers and Arts Policy

    ALAN L FELD, Michael O’hare et al.•ARTICLE•Michigan Law Review•1984

    The authors analyze indirect subsidies, which are an important sources of support for the arts and a far larger source than direct subsidies. The authors provide a well-grounded and detailed description of how the U.S. tax system relates to the arts. They ask who pays, who benefits, who decides on the allocation, and what are the effects? The findings include a realization that the reallocation on resources that indirect subsidies induce are detr…

  • Patrons despite Themselves: Taxpayers and Arts Policy

    Open Access•Peter H Schuck, ALAN L FELD et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1984•Cited by: 1

  • Indirect Aid to the Arts

    Open Access•Michael O’hare, Michael O'Hare et al.•ARTICLE•The Annals of the American…•1984

    Most government support of arts institutions is indirect—the result of charitable deduction provisions of the federal income tax, property tax exemptions extended by local governments, and other tax provisions. The money that government forgoes through these provisions must be made up by higher taxes for all taxpayers. The public, however, has little say about how these funds are spent. By its very nature, the income tax deduction places the deci…

Business (3 works) · Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 works) · Economics (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Public economics (3 works) · The arts (3 works) · Law (2 works) · Law and economics (2 works) · Ad valorem tax (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae