Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jan M Engelmann

Biographic Data

ID5757682
NAMEJan M Engelmann
GIVEN NAMESJan M
FAMILY NAMEEngelmann
SIGNATUREENGELMANN J M
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of California, Berkeley
ORCID0000-0001-5139-0289
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS16
TOTAL CITATIONS5
WORKS AS AUTHOR16
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2016
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX1
  • From prosociality to reciprocity

    Rongzhi Liu, Jan M Engelmann et al.•ARTICLE•Developmental Psychology•2026

    Friendships are fundamental to children's social and cognitive development. Previous research has shown that children understand the importance of various aspects of friendship, including prosocial behaviors. However, it is an open question whether children believe that prosocial behaviors should be reciprocated between friends. Across two experiments with 4- to 8-year-old participants (total N = 236), we examined how children weighed the importa…

  • Epistemic Curiosity in Kea Parrots and Human Children

    Open Access•Gabriella E Smith, Megan L Lambert et al.•ARTICLE•Open MIND•2025

    Both human children and animals seek information following a violation-of-expectation event, but little research suggests the latter do so for the sake of it. In this preregistered experiment, we compared epistemic curiosity—the pursuit of information for its own sake—in kea parrots (Nestor notabilis) and three-year-old human children (Homo sapiens) following a violation-of-expectation event. Subjects were trained to push a tool into an apparatus…

  • Investigating the validity of picture-based assessments across cultures and contexts

    Rebecca Zhu, Tabitha Nduku Kilonzo et al.•ARTICLE•Developmental Psychology•2025

    Many childhood assessments rely on picture stimuli, but children in diverse early environments possess varying amounts of experience with pictures. Two preregistered experiments, conducted in 2022-2023, investigated whether picture assessments are valid across diverse contexts. Low-to-middle-income children ( n = 192, 2-7 years, 85 females, all Black) in their first month of formal schooling in Mombasa County, Kenya, an early environment with rel…

  • Anticipating disagreement enhances source memory in English- and Turkish-speaking preschool children

    Open Access•Carolyn Baer, Antonia Frederike Langenhoff et al.•ARTICLE•Developmental Psychology•2025

    Metacognitive abilities like source memory are useful for justifying our beliefs to others. Do they arise because of this need? Here, we test whether circumstances that require source reporting enhance source memory. We test this in circumstances in which children anticipate a disagreement and when children speak a language with obligatory linguistic evidential marking of source (Turkish). We asked 160 English- and Turkish-speaking 3- and 4-year-…

  • Disagreement reduces overconfidence and prompts exploration in young children

    Open Access•Antonia Frederike Langenhoff, Mahesh Srinivasan et al.•ARTICLE•Child Development•2024

    Can the experience of disagreement lead young children to reason in more sophisticated ways? Across two preregistered studies, four- to six-year-old US children (N = 136, 50% female, mixed ethnicities, data collected 2020–2022) experienced either a disagreement or an agreement with a confederate about a causal mechanism after being presented with ambiguous evidence. We measured (1) children's confidence in their belief before and after the (dis)a…

  • Children and adults' intuitions of what people can believe

    Open Access•Joshua A Confer, Hanna Schleihauf et al.•ARTICLE•Child Development•2024

    Two preregistered studies tested how 5- to 6-year-olds, 7- to 8-year-olds, and adults judged the possibility of holding alternative beliefs (N = 240, 110 females, U.S. sample, mixed ethnicities, data collected from September 2020 through October 2021). In Study 1, children and adults thought people could not hold different beliefs when their initial beliefs were supported by evidence (but judged they could without this evidential constraint). In …

  • From outcome to process

    Open Access•Géraldine Brausch, Hanna Schleihauf et al.•ARTICLE•Cognition•2023

    What does it mean to reason well? One might argue that good reasoning means that the outcome of the reasoning process is correct: reaching the right belief. Alternatively, good reasoning might refer to the reasoning process itself: following the right epistemic procedures. In a preregistered study, we investigated children's (4-9-year-olds) and adults' judgments of reasoning in China and the US (N = 256). Participants of all age groups evaluated …

  • Children's developing ability to adjust their beliefs reasonably in light of disagreement

    Open Access•Antonia Frederike Langenhoff, Jan M Engelmann et al.•ARTICLE•Child Development•2023

    Two preregistered experiments (N = 218) investigated children's developing ability to respond reasonably to disagreement. U.S. children aged 4–9, and adults (50% female, mostly white) formed an initial belief, and were confronted with the belief of a disagreeing other, whose evidence was weaker, stronger than, or equal to participants' evidence. With age, participants were increasingly likely to maintain their initial belief when their own eviden…

  • Do chimpanzees reason logically

    Open Access•Jan M Engelmann, Lou M Haux et al.•ARTICLE•Child Development•2023

    Psychologists disagree about the development of logical concepts such as or and not. While some theorists argue that infants reason logically, others maintain that logical inference is contingent on linguistic abilities and emerges around age 4. In this Registered Report, we conducted five experiments on logical reasoning in chimpanzees. Subjects (N = 16; 10 females; M = 24 years) participated in the same setup that has been administered to child…

  • How children revise their beliefs in light of reasons

    Open Access•Hanna Schleihauf, Esther Herrmann et al.•ARTICLE•Child Development•2022

    We investigate how the ability to respond appropriately to reasons provided in discourse develops in young children. In Study 1 (N = 58, Germany, 26 girls), 4- and 5-, but not 3-year-old children, differentiated good from bad reasons. In Study 2 (N = 131, Germany, 64 girls), 4- and 5-year-old children considered both the strength of evidence for their initial belief and the quality of socially provided reasons for an alternative view when decidin…

  • Young children rely on gossip when jointly reasoning about whom to believe

    Bahar Koymen, Jan M Engelmann•ARTICLE•Developmental Psychology•2022

    People rely on reputational information communicated via gossip when deciding about with whom to cooperate, whom to believe, and whom to trust. In two studies, we investigated whether 5- and 7-year-old children trust in gossip when determining a course of action. In Study 1, 5- and 7-year-old German-speaking peer dyads ( N = 64 dyads, 32 female dyads) were presented with a collaborative problem-solving task (e.g., deciding together what a creatur…

  • Helping in young children and chimpanzees shows partiality towards friends

    Open Access•Jan M Engelmann, Lou M Haux et al.•ARTICLE•Evolution and Human Behavior•2019

  • Children’s Sense of Fairness as Equal Respect

    Open Access•Jan M Engelmann, M Tomasello•ARTICLE•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2019

  • Young children’s reputational strategies in a peer group context

    Diotima J Rapp, Jan M Engelmann et al.•ARTICLE•Developmental Psychology•2019•Cited by: 5

    Reputational concerns are known to promote cooperation. Individuals regularly act more prosocially when their behavior is observable by others. Here, we investigate 4- and 5-year-old (N = 144) children's reputational strategies in a competitive group setting. The aim of the current study was to explore whether children's sharing behavior is affected by the future possibility of being singled out publicly as the most generous or, alternatively, th…

  • Michael Tomasello

    Open Access•Jan M Engelmann, Jan Engelmann•CHAPTER•Encyclopedia of Evolutionary…•2016

  • Do young children preferentially trust gossip or firsthand observation in choosing a collaborative partner

    Open Access•Lou M Haux, Lou Haux et al.•ARTICLE•Social Development•2016•References: 7

    From early on in ontogeny, young children hear things being said about particular individuals. Here we investigate the ways in which testimony with social content, that is, gossip, influences children's decision‐making. We explored whether five‐year‐old ( N = 72) and seven‐year‐old ( N = 72) children trust gossip or firsthand observation in a partner choice setting. Seven‐year‐old children preferentially trusted what they had seen firsthand over …

  • Young children’s reputational strategies in a peer group context

    Diotima J Rapp, Jan M Engelmann et al.•ARTICLE•Developmental Psychology•2019•Cited by: 5

    Reputational concerns are known to promote cooperation. Individuals regularly act more prosocially when their behavior is observable by others. Here, we investigate 4- and 5-year-old (N = 144) children's reputational strategies in a competitive group setting. The aim of the current study was to explore whether children's sharing behavior is affected by the future possibility of being singled out publicly as the most generous or, alternatively, th…

  • Michael Tomasello

    Open Access•Jan M Engelmann, Jan Engelmann•CHAPTER•Encyclopedia of Evolutionary…•2016

  • Do young children preferentially trust gossip or firsthand observation in choosing a collaborative partner

    Open Access•Lou M Haux, Lou Haux et al.•ARTICLE•Social Development•2016•References: 7

    From early on in ontogeny, young children hear things being said about particular individuals. Here we investigate the ways in which testimony with social content, that is, gossip, influences children's decision‐making. We explored whether five‐year‐old ( N = 72) and seven‐year‐old ( N = 72) children trust gossip or firsthand observation in a partner choice setting. Seven‐year‐old children preferentially trusted what they had seen firsthand over …

  • Helping in young children and chimpanzees shows partiality towards friends

    Open Access•Jan M Engelmann, Lou M Haux et al.•ARTICLE•Evolution and Human Behavior•2019

  • Children’s Sense of Fairness as Equal Respect

    Open Access•Jan M Engelmann, M Tomasello•ARTICLE•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2019

  • Young children’s reputational strategies in a peer group context

    Diotima J Rapp, Jan M Engelmann et al.•ARTICLE•Developmental Psychology•2019•Cited by: 5

    Reputational concerns are known to promote cooperation. Individuals regularly act more prosocially when their behavior is observable by others. Here, we investigate 4- and 5-year-old (N = 144) children's reputational strategies in a competitive group setting. The aim of the current study was to explore whether children's sharing behavior is affected by the future possibility of being singled out publicly as the most generous or, alternatively, th…

  • How children revise their beliefs in light of reasons

    Open Access•Hanna Schleihauf, Esther Herrmann et al.•ARTICLE•Child Development•2022

    We investigate how the ability to respond appropriately to reasons provided in discourse develops in young children. In Study 1 (N = 58, Germany, 26 girls), 4- and 5-, but not 3-year-old children, differentiated good from bad reasons. In Study 2 (N = 131, Germany, 64 girls), 4- and 5-year-old children considered both the strength of evidence for their initial belief and the quality of socially provided reasons for an alternative view when decidin…

  • Young children rely on gossip when jointly reasoning about whom to believe

    Bahar Koymen, Jan M Engelmann•ARTICLE•Developmental Psychology•2022

    People rely on reputational information communicated via gossip when deciding about with whom to cooperate, whom to believe, and whom to trust. In two studies, we investigated whether 5- and 7-year-old children trust in gossip when determining a course of action. In Study 1, 5- and 7-year-old German-speaking peer dyads ( N = 64 dyads, 32 female dyads) were presented with a collaborative problem-solving task (e.g., deciding together what a creatur…

  • From outcome to process

    Open Access•Géraldine Brausch, Hanna Schleihauf et al.•ARTICLE•Cognition•2023

    What does it mean to reason well? One might argue that good reasoning means that the outcome of the reasoning process is correct: reaching the right belief. Alternatively, good reasoning might refer to the reasoning process itself: following the right epistemic procedures. In a preregistered study, we investigated children's (4-9-year-olds) and adults' judgments of reasoning in China and the US (N = 256). Participants of all age groups evaluated …

  • Children's developing ability to adjust their beliefs reasonably in light of disagreement

    Open Access•Antonia Frederike Langenhoff, Jan M Engelmann et al.•ARTICLE•Child Development•2023

    Two preregistered experiments (N = 218) investigated children's developing ability to respond reasonably to disagreement. U.S. children aged 4–9, and adults (50% female, mostly white) formed an initial belief, and were confronted with the belief of a disagreeing other, whose evidence was weaker, stronger than, or equal to participants' evidence. With age, participants were increasingly likely to maintain their initial belief when their own eviden…

  • Do chimpanzees reason logically

    Open Access•Jan M Engelmann, Lou M Haux et al.•ARTICLE•Child Development•2023

    Psychologists disagree about the development of logical concepts such as or and not. While some theorists argue that infants reason logically, others maintain that logical inference is contingent on linguistic abilities and emerges around age 4. In this Registered Report, we conducted five experiments on logical reasoning in chimpanzees. Subjects (N = 16; 10 females; M = 24 years) participated in the same setup that has been administered to child…

  • Disagreement reduces overconfidence and prompts exploration in young children

    Open Access•Antonia Frederike Langenhoff, Mahesh Srinivasan et al.•ARTICLE•Child Development•2024

    Can the experience of disagreement lead young children to reason in more sophisticated ways? Across two preregistered studies, four- to six-year-old US children (N = 136, 50% female, mixed ethnicities, data collected 2020–2022) experienced either a disagreement or an agreement with a confederate about a causal mechanism after being presented with ambiguous evidence. We measured (1) children's confidence in their belief before and after the (dis)a…

  • Children and adults' intuitions of what people can believe

    Open Access•Joshua A Confer, Hanna Schleihauf et al.•ARTICLE•Child Development•2024

    Two preregistered studies tested how 5- to 6-year-olds, 7- to 8-year-olds, and adults judged the possibility of holding alternative beliefs (N = 240, 110 females, U.S. sample, mixed ethnicities, data collected from September 2020 through October 2021). In Study 1, children and adults thought people could not hold different beliefs when their initial beliefs were supported by evidence (but judged they could without this evidential constraint). In …

  • Epistemic Curiosity in Kea Parrots and Human Children

    Open Access•Gabriella E Smith, Megan L Lambert et al.•ARTICLE•Open MIND•2025

    Both human children and animals seek information following a violation-of-expectation event, but little research suggests the latter do so for the sake of it. In this preregistered experiment, we compared epistemic curiosity—the pursuit of information for its own sake—in kea parrots (Nestor notabilis) and three-year-old human children (Homo sapiens) following a violation-of-expectation event. Subjects were trained to push a tool into an apparatus…

  • Investigating the validity of picture-based assessments across cultures and contexts

    Rebecca Zhu, Tabitha Nduku Kilonzo et al.•ARTICLE•Developmental Psychology•2025

    Many childhood assessments rely on picture stimuli, but children in diverse early environments possess varying amounts of experience with pictures. Two preregistered experiments, conducted in 2022-2023, investigated whether picture assessments are valid across diverse contexts. Low-to-middle-income children ( n = 192, 2-7 years, 85 females, all Black) in their first month of formal schooling in Mombasa County, Kenya, an early environment with rel…

  • Anticipating disagreement enhances source memory in English- and Turkish-speaking preschool children

    Open Access•Carolyn Baer, Antonia Frederike Langenhoff et al.•ARTICLE•Developmental Psychology•2025

    Metacognitive abilities like source memory are useful for justifying our beliefs to others. Do they arise because of this need? Here, we test whether circumstances that require source reporting enhance source memory. We test this in circumstances in which children anticipate a disagreement and when children speak a language with obligatory linguistic evidential marking of source (Turkish). We asked 160 English- and Turkish-speaking 3- and 4-year-…

  • From prosociality to reciprocity

    Rongzhi Liu, Jan M Engelmann et al.•ARTICLE•Developmental Psychology•2026

    Friendships are fundamental to children's social and cognitive development. Previous research has shown that children understand the importance of various aspects of friendship, including prosocial behaviors. However, it is an open question whether children believe that prosocial behaviors should be reciprocated between friends. Across two experiments with 4- to 8-year-old participants (total N = 236), we examined how children weighed the importa…

Psychology (12 works) · Child and Animal Learning Development (11 works) · Developmental psychology (11 works) · Social Psychology (9 works) · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 works) · Cognitive psychology (3 works) · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 works) · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 works) · Primate Behavior and Ecology (3 works) · Prosocial behavior (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae