Philipp Neudert
Biographic Data
| ID | 5773027 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Philipp Neudert |
| GIVEN NAMES | Philipp |
| FAMILY NAME | Neudert |
| SIGNATURE | NEUDERT P |
| AFFILIATIONS | RWTH Aachen University |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8005-636X |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Categorizing realist, critical, and pragmatist perspectives on innovation ecosystems: A research agenda and an initial application to artificial intelligence
While discourses on innovation ecosystems have become popular in academia, policy, and practice, they often take place in disciplinary silos and are marked by ambiguity. To address these issues, this research note categorizes the rapidly growing literature on innovation ecosystems into realist, critical, and pragmatist perspectives. It draws out their diverging assumptions about the nature of ecosystems, the impacts of innovation on society, and …
Democratizing science, technology, and innovation — what do we mean
Anticipatory alignment work: The politics of anticipation in an emerging innovation ecosystem of neuromorphic computing
The alignment of science, technology, and innovation with societal values and concerns is a key objective of governance approaches that include technology assessment, responsible (research and) innovation, and anticipatory governance. Such alignment is supposed to take place, inter alia, in anticipatory practices involving technoscientific experts, stakeholders, and publics, whose views are then integrated into research and development. However, …
Responsible innovation scholarship: Normative, empirical, theoretical, and engaged
Towards transformative innovation ecosystems: A systemic approach to responsible innovation
To address societal challenges, innovators committed to responsibility need to find ways to break away from unsustainable, or otherwise undesirable, path-dependencies in sociotechnical regimes. Such path-breaking innovation should not come at the expense of socioethical desirability. The emerging literature on responsible innovation ecosystems has focused on socioethical desirability but has neglected sociotechnical viability beyond a protected n…
The Limits of Responsibilization? Responsibility Boundary-Work Through Visions in the Case of Neuromorphic Computing
Visions and imaginaries have been longstanding research topics in Science and Technology Studies. Visions of sociotechnical change often ascribe responsibility for achieving the desired change to specific actors. However, there is little research on how visions create, change, and preserve responsibilities in the present. Drawing on Vision Assessment, we present a case-study on visions of neuromorphic computing in NeuroSys, a research and innovat…
The Limits of Responsibilization? Responsibility Boundary-Work Through Visions in the Case of Neuromorphic Computing
Visions and imaginaries have been longstanding research topics in Science and Technology Studies. Visions of sociotechnical change often ascribe responsibility for achieving the desired change to specific actors. However, there is little research on how visions create, change, and preserve responsibilities in the present. Drawing on Vision Assessment, we present a case-study on visions of neuromorphic computing in NeuroSys, a research and innovat…
Responsible innovation scholarship: Normative, empirical, theoretical, and engaged
Towards transformative innovation ecosystems: A systemic approach to responsible innovation
To address societal challenges, innovators committed to responsibility need to find ways to break away from unsustainable, or otherwise undesirable, path-dependencies in sociotechnical regimes. Such path-breaking innovation should not come at the expense of socioethical desirability. The emerging literature on responsible innovation ecosystems has focused on socioethical desirability but has neglected sociotechnical viability beyond a protected n…
The Limits of Responsibilization? Responsibility Boundary-Work Through Visions in the Case of Neuromorphic Computing
Visions and imaginaries have been longstanding research topics in Science and Technology Studies. Visions of sociotechnical change often ascribe responsibility for achieving the desired change to specific actors. However, there is little research on how visions create, change, and preserve responsibilities in the present. Drawing on Vision Assessment, we present a case-study on visions of neuromorphic computing in NeuroSys, a research and innovat…
Categorizing realist, critical, and pragmatist perspectives on innovation ecosystems: A research agenda and an initial application to artificial intelligence
While discourses on innovation ecosystems have become popular in academia, policy, and practice, they often take place in disciplinary silos and are marked by ambiguity. To address these issues, this research note categorizes the rapidly growing literature on innovation ecosystems into realist, critical, and pragmatist perspectives. It draws out their diverging assumptions about the nature of ecosystems, the impacts of innovation on society, and …
Democratizing science, technology, and innovation — what do we mean
Anticipatory alignment work: The politics of anticipation in an emerging innovation ecosystem of neuromorphic computing
The alignment of science, technology, and innovation with societal values and concerns is a key objective of governance approaches that include technology assessment, responsible (research and) innovation, and anticipatory governance. Such alignment is supposed to take place, inter alia, in anticipatory practices involving technoscientific experts, stakeholders, and publics, whose views are then integrated into research and development. However, …
Responsible Research and Innovation (5 works) · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (4 works) · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Public relations (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (2 works)