Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Anita Talberg

Biographic Data

ID5773686
NAMEAnita Talberg
GIVEN NAMESAnita
FAMILY NAMETalberg
SIGNATURETALBERG A
AFFILIATIONSThe University of Melbourne
ORCID0000-0002-4762-2355
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS14
AUTHOR COUNT5
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2017
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
H-INDEX2
  • Carbon‐dioxide Removal and Biodiversity: A Threat Identification Framework

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Ellycia Harrould‐kolieb et al.•ARTICLE•Global Policy•2021

    Carbon‐dioxide removal (CDR) technologies offer the potential to contribute to the restoration and protection of natural ecosystems, the achievement of development goals and the safeguarding of human wellbeing. However, these technologies can also present risks to biodiversity, particularly those techniques that depend on large‐scale manipulation of ecosystems and earth‐system processes. Debates around the development of these technologies have h…

  • Learning from the Climate Change Debate to Avoid Polarisation on Negative Emissions

    Rebecca Colvin, Luke Kemp et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Communication•2020

    This paper identifies critical lessons from the climate change experience to guide how communications and engagement on negative emissions can be conducted to encourage functional public and policy discourse. Negative emissions technologies present a significant opportunity for limiting climate change, and are likely to be necessary to keep warming below 2°C. While the concept of negative emissions is still in its infancy, there is evidence of na…

  • How geoengineering scenarios frame assumptions and create expectations

    Open Access•Anita Talberg, Sebastian Thomas et al.•ARTICLE•Sustainability Science•2018•Cited by: 4•References: 17

  • A scenario process to inform Australian geoengineering policy

    Open Access•Anita Talberg, Sebastian Thomas et al.•ARTICLE•Futures•2018•Cited by: 2•References: 47

  • Geoengineering governance-by-default: An earth system governance perspective

    Open Access•Anita Talberg, Peter Christoff et al.•ARTICLE•International Environmental…•2017•Cited by: 8•References: 7

  • Geoengineering governance-by-default: An earth system governance perspective

    Open Access•Anita Talberg, Peter Christoff et al.•ARTICLE•International Environmental…•2017•Cited by: 8•References: 7

  • How geoengineering scenarios frame assumptions and create expectations

    Open Access•Anita Talberg, Sebastian Thomas et al.•ARTICLE•Sustainability Science•2018•Cited by: 4•References: 17

  • A scenario process to inform Australian geoengineering policy

    Open Access•Anita Talberg, Sebastian Thomas et al.•ARTICLE•Futures•2018•Cited by: 2•References: 47

  • Geoengineering governance-by-default: An earth system governance perspective

    Open Access•Anita Talberg, Peter Christoff et al.•ARTICLE•International Environmental…•2017•Cited by: 8•References: 7

  • How geoengineering scenarios frame assumptions and create expectations

    Open Access•Anita Talberg, Sebastian Thomas et al.•ARTICLE•Sustainability Science•2018•Cited by: 4•References: 17

  • A scenario process to inform Australian geoengineering policy

    Open Access•Anita Talberg, Sebastian Thomas et al.•ARTICLE•Futures•2018•Cited by: 2•References: 47

  • Learning from the Climate Change Debate to Avoid Polarisation on Negative Emissions

    Rebecca Colvin, Luke Kemp et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Communication•2020

    This paper identifies critical lessons from the climate change experience to guide how communications and engagement on negative emissions can be conducted to encourage functional public and policy discourse. Negative emissions technologies present a significant opportunity for limiting climate change, and are likely to be necessary to keep warming below 2°C. While the concept of negative emissions is still in its infancy, there is evidence of na…

  • Carbon‐dioxide Removal and Biodiversity: A Threat Identification Framework

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Ellycia Harrould‐kolieb et al.•ARTICLE•Global Policy•2021

    Carbon‐dioxide removal (CDR) technologies offer the potential to contribute to the restoration and protection of natural ecosystems, the achievement of development goals and the safeguarding of human wellbeing. However, these technologies can also present risks to biodiversity, particularly those techniques that depend on large‐scale manipulation of ecosystems and earth‐system processes. Debates around the development of these technologies have h…

Climate Change and Geoengineering (5 works) · Business (4 works) · Climate change (4 works) · Ecology (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Corporate governance (3 works) · Environmental resource management (3 works) · Environmental Science (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae