Geert te Boveldt
Biographic Data
| ID | 5774879 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Geert te Boveldt |
| GIVEN NAMES | Geert te |
| FAMILY NAME | Boveldt |
| SIGNATURE | BOVELDT G T |
| AFFILIATIONS | Vrije Universiteit Brussel |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5411-0817 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 7 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 8 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Introducing Cross-impact Scenario Policy Analysis (CRISPA): Building scenarios and policy mixes based on logical consistency
Uncertainty is a fundamental challenge for public decision-making in domains requiring long-term investments, such as transport. Scenario planning is increasingly used to explore a wide range of possible futures. Scenarios typically combine several uncertain contextual factors, each of which may develop in different ways. A key difficulty, however, is that the number of possible scenarios grows exponentially with each additional factor. Methods s…
Pedestrianisation as a step in a societal transformation? An analysis of support and opposition in Brussels
Brussels (Belgium) is one of several major cities with a recent emblematic pedestrianisation project aiming to give public space ‘back to people’. Wondering whether these initiatives represent ‘cracks in the system’ of car dominance, we studied how support for the pedestrianisation has evolved across society, taking into account people's socio-economic and mobility attributes as well as geographical scale. We conducted surveys before and after im…
Building scenarios for urban mobility in 2030: The combination of cross-impact balance analysis with participatory stakeholder workshops
Designing successful energy communities: A comparison of seven pilots in Europe applying the Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis
Energy Communities (ECs) are emerging players in the energy market in the European Union. While policymakers promote their development by introducing legal entities for ECs, stakeholders experience various challenges during their set-up. A factor regarded key for the success of ECs is the consideration of stakeholder objectives. In this study we analysed seven case studies in Belgium, Spain, the Netherlands, and Greece, in which the multi-actor m…
How can multi-criteria analysis support deliberative spatial planning? A critical review of methods and participatory frameworks
In spatial planning, the paradigm has shifted from positivist to deliberative approaches. Still, cost–benefit analysis remains the dominant evaluation method. Multi-criteria analysis is arguably more appropriate, as it allows for stakeholder participation. While there are dozens of ever more sophisticated multi-criteria analysis methods, their practicality as real-world learning tools has received little attention. The goal of this article is to …
Tout le monde à bord ? Un instrument d’aide à la décision pour le futur de la Jonction ferroviaire Nord-Midi à Bruxelles
Dans le cadre de la planification de grands projets à Bruxelles, la complexité administrative représente un grand défi. En l’absence d’une autorité centrale, plusieurs acteurs aux fonctions et compétences différentes doivent prendre et exécuter une décision. La méthode COMCA permet de déterminer la portée de projets impliquant plusieurs acteurs et plusieurs niveaux et de soutenir ainsi les décideurs dans leur prise de position. Les différents act…
All aboard? A decision-making instrument for the future of the Brussels North-South railway connection
Administrative complexity is a major challenge in the planning of large-scale projects in Brussels. For want of an overarching authority, multiple actors with different functions or powers have to make and implement a concerted decision. The COMCA method is used to determine the support for multi-actor, multi-level projects and thus to assist policy makers in their decisions. The various players are classified according to their role in the proje…
Iedereen aan boord? Een besluitvormingsondersteunend instrument voor de Brusselse Noord-Zuid spoorverbinding
De bestuurlijke complexiteit vormt een grote uitdaging voor grootschalige projecten in Brussel. Bij gebrek aan een overkoepelende autoriteit moeten meerdere actoren met uiteenlopende bevoegdheden gezamenlijk een beslissing maken en uitvoeren. De hier besproken methode beoogt het draagvlak te bepalen voor dergelijke multi-actor, multi-level-projecten. De verschillende actoren worden ingedeeld op basis van hun rol.Projectalternatieven worden getoet…
Designing successful energy communities: A comparison of seven pilots in Europe applying the Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis
Energy Communities (ECs) are emerging players in the energy market in the European Union. While policymakers promote their development by introducing legal entities for ECs, stakeholders experience various challenges during their set-up. A factor regarded key for the success of ECs is the consideration of stakeholder objectives. In this study we analysed seven case studies in Belgium, Spain, the Netherlands, and Greece, in which the multi-actor m…
Building scenarios for urban mobility in 2030: The combination of cross-impact balance analysis with participatory stakeholder workshops
Tout le monde à bord ? Un instrument d’aide à la décision pour le futur de la Jonction ferroviaire Nord-Midi à Bruxelles
Dans le cadre de la planification de grands projets à Bruxelles, la complexité administrative représente un grand défi. En l’absence d’une autorité centrale, plusieurs acteurs aux fonctions et compétences différentes doivent prendre et exécuter une décision. La méthode COMCA permet de déterminer la portée de projets impliquant plusieurs acteurs et plusieurs niveaux et de soutenir ainsi les décideurs dans leur prise de position. Les différents act…
All aboard? A decision-making instrument for the future of the Brussels North-South railway connection
Administrative complexity is a major challenge in the planning of large-scale projects in Brussels. For want of an overarching authority, multiple actors with different functions or powers have to make and implement a concerted decision. The COMCA method is used to determine the support for multi-actor, multi-level projects and thus to assist policy makers in their decisions. The various players are classified according to their role in the proje…
Iedereen aan boord? Een besluitvormingsondersteunend instrument voor de Brusselse Noord-Zuid spoorverbinding
De bestuurlijke complexiteit vormt een grote uitdaging voor grootschalige projecten in Brussel. Bij gebrek aan een overkoepelende autoriteit moeten meerdere actoren met uiteenlopende bevoegdheden gezamenlijk een beslissing maken en uitvoeren. De hier besproken methode beoogt het draagvlak te bepalen voor dergelijke multi-actor, multi-level-projecten. De verschillende actoren worden ingedeeld op basis van hun rol.Projectalternatieven worden getoet…
How can multi-criteria analysis support deliberative spatial planning? A critical review of methods and participatory frameworks
In spatial planning, the paradigm has shifted from positivist to deliberative approaches. Still, cost–benefit analysis remains the dominant evaluation method. Multi-criteria analysis is arguably more appropriate, as it allows for stakeholder participation. While there are dozens of ever more sophisticated multi-criteria analysis methods, their practicality as real-world learning tools has received little attention. The goal of this article is to …
Designing successful energy communities: A comparison of seven pilots in Europe applying the Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis
Energy Communities (ECs) are emerging players in the energy market in the European Union. While policymakers promote their development by introducing legal entities for ECs, stakeholders experience various challenges during their set-up. A factor regarded key for the success of ECs is the consideration of stakeholder objectives. In this study we analysed seven case studies in Belgium, Spain, the Netherlands, and Greece, in which the multi-actor m…
Pedestrianisation as a step in a societal transformation? An analysis of support and opposition in Brussels
Brussels (Belgium) is one of several major cities with a recent emblematic pedestrianisation project aiming to give public space ‘back to people’. Wondering whether these initiatives represent ‘cracks in the system’ of car dominance, we studied how support for the pedestrianisation has evolved across society, taking into account people's socio-economic and mobility attributes as well as geographical scale. We conducted surveys before and after im…
Building scenarios for urban mobility in 2030: The combination of cross-impact balance analysis with participatory stakeholder workshops
Introducing Cross-impact Scenario Policy Analysis (CRISPA): Building scenarios and policy mixes based on logical consistency
Uncertainty is a fundamental challenge for public decision-making in domains requiring long-term investments, such as transport. Scenario planning is increasingly used to explore a wide range of possible futures. Scenarios typically combine several uncertain contextual factors, each of which may develop in different ways. A key difficulty, however, is that the number of possible scenarios grows exponentially with each additional factor. Methods s…
Political science (7 works) · Business (4 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (4 works) · Citizen journalism (3 works) · Economics (3 works) · Engineering (3 works) · Participatory planning (3 works) · Process management (3 works) · Public relations (3 works)