Niklas Gudowsky
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 5775080 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Niklas Gudowsky |
| PRENOMES | Niklas |
| SOBRENOME | Gudowsky |
| ASSINATURA | GUDOWSKY N |
| AFILIAÇÕES | Austrian Academy of Sciences |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-1182-7703 |
| VERIFICADO | Sim |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 14 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 57 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 14 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2013 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2023 |
| ÍNDICE H | 5 |
Augmented futures? Scenarios and implications of augmented reality use in public spaces
Democratising utopian thought in participatory agenda setting
Engaging non-experts in matters of science and technology has been increasingly stressed in both rhetoric and action during the past decades. Under the call for moving participation upstream, agenda setting processes have been identified as viable entry point for laypeople’s experiential and value-based knowledge into science, technology and innovation governance (STI). Harnessing visioning for target setting promises to elicit such knowledge, wh…
Limits and benefits of participatory agenda setting for research and innovation
Current governance of science, technology and innovation (STI) faces tough challenges to meet demands arising from complex issues such as societal challenges or targets, e.g. the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. For decades, scholars and civil society institutions have called for increased public participation in STI, and political institutions have been taking up the request to integrate engagement activities into their decision-ma…
Sensemaking and lens-shaping
As foresight activities continue to increase across multiple arenas and types of organizations, the need to develop effective modes of reviewing future-oriented information against long-term goals and policies becomes more pressing. The activities of institutional sensemaking are vital in constructing potential and desired futures, but remain sensitive to organizational culture and ethos, thus raising concerns about whose futures are being constr…
Theoretical and Practical Research Ethics
AoIR and the Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society (JICES) share common interests in critical reflection on the ethical and social dimensions of the internet and internet-facilitated communication, and have begun a collaboration aimed at collecting ethically-focused AoIR conference submissions for presentation and critique at AoIR, with a view towards subsequent publication in a special issue of JICES. This panel collects th…
Bridging epistemologies—Identifying uniqueness of lay and expert knowledge for agenda setting
Foresight and technology assessment for the Austrian parliament — Finding new ways of debating the future of industry 4.0
But do they deliver? Participatory agenda setting on the test bed
In this contribution, we investigate how results produced in a large-scale participatory agenda setting process differ from results of expert-based foresight studies with a similar aim of informing EU research and innovation (R&I) policy. After providing a theoretical positioning and an overview of the EU-wide participatory agenda setting process CIMULACT—Citizen and Multi-Actor Consultation on Horizon 2020, we describe our developed analytical a…
Imagining socio-technical futures – challenges and opportunities for technology assessment
An increasing orientation of technology assessment (TA) and adjacent fields toward future socio-technological developments is leading scholars to examine, assess and adapt different approaches of future studies on various levels. In this special issue of the Journal of Responsible Innovation, a number of members of the extended TA community in Europe seek to advance different approaches to handling the unpredictable, to consider various possible …
Futures of ageing and technology – comparing different actors’ prospective views
Ambient and assistive technologies (AT) have the potential to increase individual autonomy, social participation and quality of life for ageing populations. In seeking to implement these technologies, national and supranational funding schemes have strongly supported primarily market-driven research activities. This means that other societally relevant aspects, such as specific social and cultural contexts, are likely to be underestimated if not …
Into Blue Skies—a Transdisciplinary Foresight and Co-creation Method for Adding Robustness to Visioneering
Transdisciplinary forward-looking agenda setting for age-friendly, human centered cities
Human centred science and technology—transdisciplinary foresight and co-creation as tools for active needs-based innovation governance
Current governance structures are increasingly showing inability to address complex issues such as the Grand Challenges. Dealing with these highly interrelated, cross cutting, extensive and potentially open ended issues requires research, development and innovation to be oriented towards societal needs and demands. Here, developing and applying sustainable long term strategies for socio-technical change on the basis of socially robust knowledge s…
The Role of Information in Public Participation
A large body of scientific literature on public participation research evaluates specific methods, describes outcomes and impacts of a process or deals with participants’ and officials’ expectations. Yet, there is surprisingly little work on a key part of most participatory processes that deal with complex issues: the information passed to participants. Topics like Global Warming cannot be grasped easily. Even if global warming is happening very …
Bridging epistemologies—Identifying uniqueness of lay and expert knowledge for agenda setting
Into Blue Skies—a Transdisciplinary Foresight and Co-creation Method for Adding Robustness to Visioneering
Human centred science and technology—transdisciplinary foresight and co-creation as tools for active needs-based innovation governance
Current governance structures are increasingly showing inability to address complex issues such as the Grand Challenges. Dealing with these highly interrelated, cross cutting, extensive and potentially open ended issues requires research, development and innovation to be oriented towards societal needs and demands. Here, developing and applying sustainable long term strategies for socio-technical change on the basis of socially robust knowledge s…
Transdisciplinary forward-looking agenda setting for age-friendly, human centered cities
Sensemaking and lens-shaping
As foresight activities continue to increase across multiple arenas and types of organizations, the need to develop effective modes of reviewing future-oriented information against long-term goals and policies becomes more pressing. The activities of institutional sensemaking are vital in constructing potential and desired futures, but remain sensitive to organizational culture and ethos, thus raising concerns about whose futures are being constr…
Foresight and technology assessment for the Austrian parliament — Finding new ways of debating the future of industry 4.0
But do they deliver? Participatory agenda setting on the test bed
In this contribution, we investigate how results produced in a large-scale participatory agenda setting process differ from results of expert-based foresight studies with a similar aim of informing EU research and innovation (R&I) policy. After providing a theoretical positioning and an overview of the EU-wide participatory agenda setting process CIMULACT—Citizen and Multi-Actor Consultation on Horizon 2020, we describe our developed analytical a…
Democratising utopian thought in participatory agenda setting
Engaging non-experts in matters of science and technology has been increasingly stressed in both rhetoric and action during the past decades. Under the call for moving participation upstream, agenda setting processes have been identified as viable entry point for laypeople’s experiential and value-based knowledge into science, technology and innovation governance (STI). Harnessing visioning for target setting promises to elicit such knowledge, wh…
Limits and benefits of participatory agenda setting for research and innovation
Current governance of science, technology and innovation (STI) faces tough challenges to meet demands arising from complex issues such as societal challenges or targets, e.g. the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. For decades, scholars and civil society institutions have called for increased public participation in STI, and political institutions have been taking up the request to integrate engagement activities into their decision-ma…
The Role of Information in Public Participation
A large body of scientific literature on public participation research evaluates specific methods, describes outcomes and impacts of a process or deals with participants’ and officials’ expectations. Yet, there is surprisingly little work on a key part of most participatory processes that deal with complex issues: the information passed to participants. Topics like Global Warming cannot be grasped easily. Even if global warming is happening very …
Human centred science and technology—transdisciplinary foresight and co-creation as tools for active needs-based innovation governance
Current governance structures are increasingly showing inability to address complex issues such as the Grand Challenges. Dealing with these highly interrelated, cross cutting, extensive and potentially open ended issues requires research, development and innovation to be oriented towards societal needs and demands. Here, developing and applying sustainable long term strategies for socio-technical change on the basis of socially robust knowledge s…
Imagining socio-technical futures – challenges and opportunities for technology assessment
An increasing orientation of technology assessment (TA) and adjacent fields toward future socio-technological developments is leading scholars to examine, assess and adapt different approaches of future studies on various levels. In this special issue of the Journal of Responsible Innovation, a number of members of the extended TA community in Europe seek to advance different approaches to handling the unpredictable, to consider various possible …
Futures of ageing and technology – comparing different actors’ prospective views
Ambient and assistive technologies (AT) have the potential to increase individual autonomy, social participation and quality of life for ageing populations. In seeking to implement these technologies, national and supranational funding schemes have strongly supported primarily market-driven research activities. This means that other societally relevant aspects, such as specific social and cultural contexts, are likely to be underestimated if not …
Into Blue Skies—a Transdisciplinary Foresight and Co-creation Method for Adding Robustness to Visioneering
Transdisciplinary forward-looking agenda setting for age-friendly, human centered cities
But do they deliver? Participatory agenda setting on the test bed
In this contribution, we investigate how results produced in a large-scale participatory agenda setting process differ from results of expert-based foresight studies with a similar aim of informing EU research and innovation (R&I) policy. After providing a theoretical positioning and an overview of the EU-wide participatory agenda setting process CIMULACT—Citizen and Multi-Actor Consultation on Horizon 2020, we describe our developed analytical a…
Bridging epistemologies—Identifying uniqueness of lay and expert knowledge for agenda setting
Foresight and technology assessment for the Austrian parliament — Finding new ways of debating the future of industry 4.0
Theoretical and Practical Research Ethics
AoIR and the Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society (JICES) share common interests in critical reflection on the ethical and social dimensions of the internet and internet-facilitated communication, and have begun a collaboration aimed at collecting ethically-focused AoIR conference submissions for presentation and critique at AoIR, with a view towards subsequent publication in a special issue of JICES. This panel collects th…
Democratising utopian thought in participatory agenda setting
Engaging non-experts in matters of science and technology has been increasingly stressed in both rhetoric and action during the past decades. Under the call for moving participation upstream, agenda setting processes have been identified as viable entry point for laypeople’s experiential and value-based knowledge into science, technology and innovation governance (STI). Harnessing visioning for target setting promises to elicit such knowledge, wh…
Limits and benefits of participatory agenda setting for research and innovation
Current governance of science, technology and innovation (STI) faces tough challenges to meet demands arising from complex issues such as societal challenges or targets, e.g. the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. For decades, scholars and civil society institutions have called for increased public participation in STI, and political institutions have been taking up the request to integrate engagement activities into their decision-ma…
Sensemaking and lens-shaping
As foresight activities continue to increase across multiple arenas and types of organizations, the need to develop effective modes of reviewing future-oriented information against long-term goals and policies becomes more pressing. The activities of institutional sensemaking are vital in constructing potential and desired futures, but remain sensitive to organizational culture and ethos, thus raising concerns about whose futures are being constr…
Augmented futures? Scenarios and implications of augmented reality use in public spaces
Political science (14 obras) · Sociology (12 obras) · Public relations (11 obras) · Computer Science (9 obras) · Engineering (9 obras) · Futures studies (9 obras) · Business (8 obras) · Responsible Research and Innovation (8 obras) · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (8 obras) · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (7 obras)