Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sebastian Peyer

Biographic Data

ID5793984
NAMESebastian Peyer
GIVEN NAMESSebastian
FAMILY NAMEPeyer
SIGNATUREPEYER S
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of East Anglia
ORCID0000-0002-8901-7188
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS1
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2011
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX1
  • Time for Parliament to act? The Paccar decision of the UK Supreme Court: R (on the application of Paccar Inc and Others) (Appellants) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and Others (Respondents) [2023] UKSC…

    Open Access•Sebastian Peyer•ARTICLE•Legal Studies•2024

    Litigation funding has become an essential ingredient in collective actions for breaches of competition law brought in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT). In the recent PACCAR proceedings, the Supreme Court was asked to rule on the nature and enforceability of litigation funding agreements (LFAs) between third-party litigation funders and group representatives where the success fee is determined as a percentage of the damages award. 1 The Cour…

  • Cartel Members Only—revisiting Private Antitrust Policy in Europe

    Open Access•Sebastian Peyer•ARTICLE•International and Comparative Law…•2011•References: 30

    This paper examines the current European private antitrust enforcement policy. The European Commission's White Paper of 2008, the unofficial Draft Directive of 2009 and the collective redress consultation of 2011 consider a facilitated access to private actions for all types of antitrust violations under articles 101 and 102 TFEU in order to effectively compensate the victims of anticompetitive conduct. Assuming that changes are necessary, the pa…

  • Judicial Scrutiny of Merger Decisions in the Eu, Uk and Germany

    Open Access•Michael Harker, Sebastian Peyer et al.•ARTICLE•International and Comparative Law…•2011•Cited by: 1•References: 24

    The appropriate role of the courts in controlling the discretion of merger authorities has become one of the key issues in European merger law and policy in recent years. This article investigates judicial review of merger decisions, taking a comparative approach by examining cases from the EU, UK and Germany. We observe an apparent increase in the willingness of the EU and UK courts to scrutinize merger decisions, and a long-standing tradition o…

  • Judicial Scrutiny of Merger Decisions in the Eu, Uk and Germany

    Open Access•Michael Harker, Sebastian Peyer et al.•ARTICLE•International and Comparative Law…•2011•Cited by: 1•References: 24

    The appropriate role of the courts in controlling the discretion of merger authorities has become one of the key issues in European merger law and policy in recent years. This article investigates judicial review of merger decisions, taking a comparative approach by examining cases from the EU, UK and Germany. We observe an apparent increase in the willingness of the EU and UK courts to scrutinize merger decisions, and a long-standing tradition o…

  • Cartel Members Only—revisiting Private Antitrust Policy in Europe

    Open Access•Sebastian Peyer•ARTICLE•International and Comparative Law…•2011•References: 30

    This paper examines the current European private antitrust enforcement policy. The European Commission's White Paper of 2008, the unofficial Draft Directive of 2009 and the collective redress consultation of 2011 consider a facilitated access to private actions for all types of antitrust violations under articles 101 and 102 TFEU in order to effectively compensate the victims of anticompetitive conduct. Assuming that changes are necessary, the pa…

  • Judicial Scrutiny of Merger Decisions in the Eu, Uk and Germany

    Open Access•Michael Harker, Sebastian Peyer et al.•ARTICLE•International and Comparative Law…•2011•Cited by: 1•References: 24

    The appropriate role of the courts in controlling the discretion of merger authorities has become one of the key issues in European merger law and policy in recent years. This article investigates judicial review of merger decisions, taking a comparative approach by examining cases from the EU, UK and Germany. We observe an apparent increase in the willingness of the EU and UK courts to scrutinize merger decisions, and a long-standing tradition o…

  • Time for Parliament to act? The Paccar decision of the UK Supreme Court: R (on the application of Paccar Inc and Others) (Appellants) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and Others (Respondents) [2023] UKSC…

    Open Access•Sebastian Peyer•ARTICLE•Legal Studies•2024

    Litigation funding has become an essential ingredient in collective actions for breaches of competition law brought in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT). In the recent PACCAR proceedings, the Supreme Court was asked to rule on the nature and enforceability of litigation funding agreements (LFAs) between third-party litigation funders and group representatives where the success fee is determined as a percentage of the damages award. 1 The Cour…

Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Economics (2 works) · European and International Law Studies (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law and economics (2 works) · Agency (philosophy (1 works) · Business (1 works) · Cartel (1 works) · Collusion (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae