Vid Prislan
Biographic Data
| ID | 5794473 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Vid Prislan |
| GIVEN NAMES | Vid |
| FAMILY NAME | Prislan |
| SIGNATURE | PRISLAN V |
| AFFILIATIONS | Center for International Environmental Law |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2271-7921 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Judicial Expropriation in International Investment Law
This article examines the notion of judicial takings in international law and its reflection in the practice of investment tribunals. It takes stock of the already significant body of arbitral jurisprudence dealing with expropriation claims grounded in, or relating to, the acts or omissions of courts, with a view to developing a coherent theory of judicial expropriations. It is suggested that, due to the courts’ specific role in the determination…
Domestic Explanatory Documents and Treaty Interpretation
The article discusses the increasing use by international courts and tribunals of domestic explanatory materials—such as various statements, reports, and explanatory memoranda that usually complement the domestic approval of treaties—in the process of treaty interpretation. After examining the types of materials that can be used as interpretative aids in accordance with the general rules on treaty interpretation (Articles 31–32 VCLT), the article…
No prominent works on this page.
Domestic Explanatory Documents and Treaty Interpretation
The article discusses the increasing use by international courts and tribunals of domestic explanatory materials—such as various statements, reports, and explanatory memoranda that usually complement the domestic approval of treaties—in the process of treaty interpretation. After examining the types of materials that can be used as interpretative aids in accordance with the general rules on treaty interpretation (Articles 31–32 VCLT), the article…
Judicial Expropriation in International Investment Law
This article examines the notion of judicial takings in international law and its reflection in the practice of investment tribunals. It takes stock of the already significant body of arbitral jurisprudence dealing with expropriation claims grounded in, or relating to, the acts or omissions of courts, with a view to developing a coherent theory of judicial expropriations. It is suggested that, due to the courts’ specific role in the determination…
International Arbitration and Investment Law (2 works) · International Law and Human Rights (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Business (1 works) · Common law (1 works) · Computer Science (1 works) · Corporate Law and Human Rights (1 works) · Doctrine (1 works)