Justine N Stefanelli
Biographic Data
| ID | 5794585 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Justine N Stefanelli |
| GIVEN NAMES | Justine N |
| FAMILY NAME | Stefanelli |
| SIGNATURE | STEFANELLI J N |
| AFFILIATIONS | British Institute of International and Comparative Law |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Detained during a Pandemic
Every year, thousands of people are detained in United States immigration detention centers. Built to prison specifications and often run by private companies, these detention centers have long been criticized by academics and advocacy groups. Problems such as overcrowding and lack of access to basic healthcare and legal representation have plagued individuals in detention centers for years. These failings have been illuminated by the COVID-19 pa…
Expanding Akzo Nobel
Following on from its judgment in Akzo Nobel , 1 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on 6 September 2012 delivered its judgment in Prezes . 2 Prezes expanded the decision in Akzo Nobel , which held that communications between a client and its in-house legal counsel were not protected by legal privilege because the latter are not considered sufficiently independent from the former. Taking this holding one step further, the CJEU in Pr…
Iii. The Negative Implications of Eu Privilege Law Under Akzo Nobel at Home and Abroad
On 14 September 2010 the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) delivered its judgment in Akzo Nobel . 1 The judgment and its preceding opinion focused on the application of legal professional privilege to communications between a client and in-house legal counsel. The less-emphasized aspect of the case was the Court's decision to exclude all lawyers qualified outside of the European Union (EU) from the application of legal professional pri…
Ii. Whose Rule of Law? An Analysis of the Uk's Decision Not to Opt-in to the Eu Asylum Procedures and Reception Conditions Directives
The United Kingdom (‘UK’) has indicated its intention not to opt-in to two proposals from the European Commission aimed at further developing the Common European Asylum System through the replacement of existing instruments on asylum procedures and reception conditions. The purpose of the European Union (‘EU’) amendment process is to establish rules that more closely align the legal framework for asylum in the Member States so that asylum seekers…
Ii. Whose Rule of Law? An Analysis of the Uk's Decision Not to Opt-in to the Eu Asylum Procedures and Reception Conditions Directives
The United Kingdom (‘UK’) has indicated its intention not to opt-in to two proposals from the European Commission aimed at further developing the Common European Asylum System through the replacement of existing instruments on asylum procedures and reception conditions. The purpose of the European Union (‘EU’) amendment process is to establish rules that more closely align the legal framework for asylum in the Member States so that asylum seekers…
Iii. The Negative Implications of Eu Privilege Law Under Akzo Nobel at Home and Abroad
On 14 September 2010 the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) delivered its judgment in Akzo Nobel . 1 The judgment and its preceding opinion focused on the application of legal professional privilege to communications between a client and in-house legal counsel. The less-emphasized aspect of the case was the Court's decision to exclude all lawyers qualified outside of the European Union (EU) from the application of legal professional pri…
Ii. Whose Rule of Law? An Analysis of the Uk's Decision Not to Opt-in to the Eu Asylum Procedures and Reception Conditions Directives
The United Kingdom (‘UK’) has indicated its intention not to opt-in to two proposals from the European Commission aimed at further developing the Common European Asylum System through the replacement of existing instruments on asylum procedures and reception conditions. The purpose of the European Union (‘EU’) amendment process is to establish rules that more closely align the legal framework for asylum in the Member States so that asylum seekers…
Expanding Akzo Nobel
Following on from its judgment in Akzo Nobel , 1 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on 6 September 2012 delivered its judgment in Prezes . 2 Prezes expanded the decision in Akzo Nobel , which held that communications between a client and its in-house legal counsel were not protected by legal privilege because the latter are not considered sufficiently independent from the former. Taking this holding one step further, the CJEU in Pr…
Detained during a Pandemic
Every year, thousands of people are detained in United States immigration detention centers. Built to prison specifications and often run by private companies, these detention centers have long been criticized by academics and advocacy groups. Problems such as overcrowding and lack of access to basic healthcare and legal representation have plagued individuals in detention centers for years. These failings have been illuminated by the COVID-19 pa…
Law (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Business (3 works) · European and International Law Studies (3 works) · European union (3 works) · Human rights (3 works) · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (2 works) · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (2 works) · Privilege (computing (2 works)