Lukas Antoine
Biographic Data
| ID | 5814733 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Lukas Antoine |
| GIVEN NAMES | Lukas |
| FAMILY NAME | Antoine |
| SIGNATURE | ANTOINE L |
| AFFILIATIONS | Freie Universität Berlin |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-5720-5734 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Threat perceptions and the globalisation divide
Globalisation has contributed to the emergence of a new societal cleavage. While the structural and organisational dimensions of this divide are well documented, its psychological component remains less understood. Drawing on comparative survey data from 30 countries collected through the Public Attitudes towards the Liberal Script (PALS) project, this research note examines whether individuals who perceive themselves as losers of globalisation d…
The Distinction between Refugees and Immigrants: Philosophical Arguments, International Law, and Citizens’ Attitudes in 26 Countries
International law obliges states to admit refugees while allowing discretion in accepting voluntary immigrants. This study, based on a 26-country survey, examines citizen attitudes towards these groups. With reference to the debate in political philosophy, the authors distinguish between different attitudinal groups: Nationalists, who advocate for border control; Cosmopolitans, who support unrestricted immigration rights; Legalists, who align wit…
State Sovereignty and the Protection of Human Rights. How Military Humanitarian Intervention is Supported by Citizens Around the World
According to international law, the sovereignty of nation-states and the rights of individuals constitute two equally important principles. However, in instances when a state massively violates human rights, then priority is given to the protection of individuals over the selfdetermination of the state, thereby justifying humanitarian military intervention. This paper presents findings from a survey across 26 countries, analyzing citizen support …
Costs, Inconvenience, or Civil Rights? Investigating Determinants of Public Support for Surveillance
As a response to security threats, governments around the globe, albeit in different magnitude, have implemented measures of mass surveillance interfering with individual rights. Regardless of prominent (normative) debates on surveillance and security, studies examining individual attitudes and factors explaining them are relatively scarce. While people in general prefer living in a secure environment, I argue that it is not only the imminent tra…
The power of a promise: Whom do governments’ security justifications convince to accept surveillance
To justify surveillance measures and gain them public support, governments use the promise of security. It is usually claimed that individuals are more willing to have freedom and privacy restricted than waiving a promise of increased security. However, empirical evidence to support this claim has been scarce—especially from a comparative perspective. Focusing on surveillance measures, this paper shows that people do indeed express greater accept…
No prominent works on this page.
The power of a promise: Whom do governments’ security justifications convince to accept surveillance
To justify surveillance measures and gain them public support, governments use the promise of security. It is usually claimed that individuals are more willing to have freedom and privacy restricted than waiving a promise of increased security. However, empirical evidence to support this claim has been scarce—especially from a comparative perspective. Focusing on surveillance measures, this paper shows that people do indeed express greater accept…
Costs, Inconvenience, or Civil Rights? Investigating Determinants of Public Support for Surveillance
As a response to security threats, governments around the globe, albeit in different magnitude, have implemented measures of mass surveillance interfering with individual rights. Regardless of prominent (normative) debates on surveillance and security, studies examining individual attitudes and factors explaining them are relatively scarce. While people in general prefer living in a secure environment, I argue that it is not only the imminent tra…
The Distinction between Refugees and Immigrants: Philosophical Arguments, International Law, and Citizens’ Attitudes in 26 Countries
International law obliges states to admit refugees while allowing discretion in accepting voluntary immigrants. This study, based on a 26-country survey, examines citizen attitudes towards these groups. With reference to the debate in political philosophy, the authors distinguish between different attitudinal groups: Nationalists, who advocate for border control; Cosmopolitans, who support unrestricted immigration rights; Legalists, who align wit…
State Sovereignty and the Protection of Human Rights. How Military Humanitarian Intervention is Supported by Citizens Around the World
According to international law, the sovereignty of nation-states and the rights of individuals constitute two equally important principles. However, in instances when a state massively violates human rights, then priority is given to the protection of individuals over the selfdetermination of the state, thereby justifying humanitarian military intervention. This paper presents findings from a survey across 26 countries, analyzing citizen support …
Threat perceptions and the globalisation divide
Globalisation has contributed to the emergence of a new societal cleavage. While the structural and organisational dimensions of this divide are well documented, its psychological component remains less understood. Drawing on comparative survey data from 30 countries collected through the Public Attitudes towards the Liberal Script (PALS) project, this research note examines whether individuals who perceive themselves as losers of globalisation d…
Law (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Economics (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Migration, Refugees, and Integration (2 works) · Public economics (2 works) · Social Media and Politics (2 works) · Autocracy (1 works)