Robert Stromer
Biographic Data
| ID | 5835993 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Robert Stromer |
| GIVEN NAMES | Robert |
| FAMILY NAME | Stromer |
| SIGNATURE | STROMER R |
| AFFILIATIONS | Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1989 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1995 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Delayed Matching to Complex Samples and the Formation of Stimulus Classes in Children
In two experiments (ns = 3 plus a previously tested child, and 2, respectively), children learned delayed matching with complex samples, each consisting of a form and a printed nonsense word. Forms or printed words were comparison stimuli. For form comparisons, selecting the form identical to that in the preceding sample was reinforced. For printed word comparisons, selecting the word identical to that in the preceding sample was reinforced. Duri…
Conditional Stimulus Control of Childrens' Sequence Production
Normally capable children were first taught to touch in sequence each of a set of five physically dissimilar stimuli (Sequence A). Another set of stimuli was then used to train sequence B. Next, direct training established conditional control of the production of the A sequence and its reversal: in the presence of one printed word, touching the stimuli in the order A1----A2----A3----A4----A5 was reinforced; in the presence of another word, touchi…
Conditional Stimulus Control of Childrens' Sequence Production
Normally capable children were first taught to touch in sequence each of a set of five physically dissimilar stimuli (Sequence A). Another set of stimuli was then used to train sequence B. Next, direct training established conditional control of the production of the A sequence and its reversal: in the presence of one printed word, touching the stimuli in the order A1→A2→A3→A4→A5 was reinforced; in the presence of another word, touching the stimu…
Symmetry of Control by Exclusion in Humans' Arbitrary Matching to Sample
Normally capable children and adults were taught arbitrary matching of visual sample stimuli and nonidentical visual comparison stimuli: if Sample A1, selecting comparison B1 was reinforced; if A2, selecting B2 was reinforced. Unreinforced tests included (1) those that assessed preferences between novel comparisons when samples were also novel and (2) those that assessed selections of the least-preferred novel comparisons when the alternate compa…
No prominent works on this page.
Symmetry of Control by Exclusion in Humans' Arbitrary Matching to Sample
Normally capable children and adults were taught arbitrary matching of visual sample stimuli and nonidentical visual comparison stimuli: if Sample A1, selecting comparison B1 was reinforced; if A2, selecting B2 was reinforced. Unreinforced tests included (1) those that assessed preferences between novel comparisons when samples were also novel and (2) those that assessed selections of the least-preferred novel comparisons when the alternate compa…
Conditional Stimulus Control of Childrens' Sequence Production
Normally capable children were first taught to touch in sequence each of a set of five physically dissimilar stimuli (Sequence A). Another set of stimuli was then used to train sequence B. Next, direct training established conditional control of the production of the A sequence and its reversal: in the presence of one printed word, touching the stimuli in the order A1----A2----A3----A4----A5 was reinforced; in the presence of another word, touchi…
Conditional Stimulus Control of Childrens' Sequence Production
Normally capable children were first taught to touch in sequence each of a set of five physically dissimilar stimuli (Sequence A). Another set of stimuli was then used to train sequence B. Next, direct training established conditional control of the production of the A sequence and its reversal: in the presence of one printed word, touching the stimuli in the order A1→A2→A3→A4→A5 was reinforced; in the presence of another word, touching the stimu…
Delayed Matching to Complex Samples and the Formation of Stimulus Classes in Children
In two experiments (ns = 3 plus a previously tested child, and 2, respectively), children learned delayed matching with complex samples, each consisting of a form and a printed nonsense word. Forms or printed words were comparison stimuli. For form comparisons, selecting the form identical to that in the preceding sample was reinforced. For printed word comparisons, selecting the word identical to that in the preceding sample was reinforced. Duri…
Cognitive psychology (4 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Audiology (3 works) · Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 works) · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 works) · Communication (3 works) · Communication (3 works) · Medicine (3 works) · Stimulus (psychology (3 works)