Vinay Prasad
Biographic Data
| ID | 5843985 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Vinay Prasad |
| GIVEN NAMES | Vinay |
| FAMILY NAME | Prasad |
| SIGNATURE | PRASAD V |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of California, San Francisco |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6110-8221 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 10 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 10 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1974 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
The Ethical Obligation for Research During Public Health Emergencies
In times of crises, public health leaders may claim that trials of public health interventions are unethical. One reason for this claim can be that equipoise —i.e. a situation of uncertainty and/or disagreement among experts about the evidence regarding an intervention—has been disturbed by a change of collective expert views. Some might claim that equipoise is disturbed if the majority of experts believe that emergency public health intervention…
University-age vaccine mandates
For the first comparison, we weighed predicted hospitalisations prevented by one booster dose of BNT162b2 with vaccine-associated SAEs from the manufacturer's randomised trial (3/5055).3 We found that the rate of expected SAEs would outweigh the benefits of the booster against hospitalisation by at least 18-fold. Lam and Nichols suggest that this was an inappropriate comparison, as not all SAEs result in hospitalisation. However, the definition o…
Covid-19 vaccine boosters for young adults
In 2022, students at North American universities with third-dose COVID-19 vaccine mandates risk disenrolment if unvaccinated. To assess the appropriateness of booster mandates in this age group, we combine empirical risk-benefit assessment and ethical analysis. To prevent one COVID-19 hospitalisation over a 6-month period, we estimate that 31 207–42 836 young adults aged 18–29 years must receive a third mRNA vaccine. Booster mandates in young adu…
The Kardashian Index
The Kardashian Index was designed for comedic purposes and meant to highlight researchers with minimal scholar contribution but oversized social media influence. We sought to examine attitudes and understanding of the Kardashian index by conducting a retrospective observational study of tweets retrieved from the Twitter API, Academic Track. From July 30th, 2014 to May 1st, 2021, 5826 unique tweets containing the phrase "Kardashian index” or relat…
How Often do Medical Specialties Question the Practices that They Perform? An Empirical, Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Published Literature
An aspect of overuse is who decides which practices are evaluated for overuse and which of the studies on overuse are published in the medical literature. We sought to examine the frequency with which studies in medical journals questioned an established practice. As a secondary objective, we sought to determine if there was variance among medical specialties. We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional review of the published literature in 14 …
Financial Conflicts of Interest at FDA Drug Advisory Committee Meetings
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's drug advisory committees provide expert assessments of the safety and efficacy of new therapies considered for approval. A committee hears from a variety of speakers, from six groups, including voting members of the committee, FDA staff members, employees of the pharmaceutical company seeking approval of a therapy, patient and consumer representatives, expert speakers invited by the company, and public part…
Closed Financial Loops
Many physicians are involved in relationships that create tension between a physician's duty to work in her patients’ best interest at all times and her financial arrangement with a third party, most often a pharmaceutical manufacturer, whose primary goal is maximizing sales or profit. Despite the prevalence of this threat, in the United States and globally, the most common reaction to conflicts of interest in medicine is timid acceptance. There …
A medical burden of proof
Reclaiming the morbidity and mortality conference
In recent years, a number of commentators have voiced unease about the direction and format of the Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) conference. Drawing on historical, literary and philosophical perspectives, and detailing the recent shift towards incorporating systems-based approaches to healthcare safety into the M&M, this article explores the nature and purpose of the M&M conference. It is argued that improving future health outcomes is insufficie…
Children's TV Commercials
Journal Article Children's TV Commercials: A Review of Research Get access Anees A. Sheikh, Anees A. Sheikh 1Anees A. Sheikh is Associate Professor of Psychology at Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar V. Kanti Prasad, V. Kanti Prasad 2V. Kanti Prasad is Assistant Professor in the School of Business Administration, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee Search for other …
No prominent works on this page.
Children's TV Commercials
Journal Article Children's TV Commercials: A Review of Research Get access Anees A. Sheikh, Anees A. Sheikh 1Anees A. Sheikh is Associate Professor of Psychology at Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar V. Kanti Prasad, V. Kanti Prasad 2V. Kanti Prasad is Assistant Professor in the School of Business Administration, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee Search for other …
Reclaiming the morbidity and mortality conference
In recent years, a number of commentators have voiced unease about the direction and format of the Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) conference. Drawing on historical, literary and philosophical perspectives, and detailing the recent shift towards incorporating systems-based approaches to healthcare safety into the M&M, this article explores the nature and purpose of the M&M conference. It is argued that improving future health outcomes is insufficie…
A medical burden of proof
Closed Financial Loops
Many physicians are involved in relationships that create tension between a physician's duty to work in her patients’ best interest at all times and her financial arrangement with a third party, most often a pharmaceutical manufacturer, whose primary goal is maximizing sales or profit. Despite the prevalence of this threat, in the United States and globally, the most common reaction to conflicts of interest in medicine is timid acceptance. There …
Financial Conflicts of Interest at FDA Drug Advisory Committee Meetings
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's drug advisory committees provide expert assessments of the safety and efficacy of new therapies considered for approval. A committee hears from a variety of speakers, from six groups, including voting members of the committee, FDA staff members, employees of the pharmaceutical company seeking approval of a therapy, patient and consumer representatives, expert speakers invited by the company, and public part…
The Kardashian Index
The Kardashian Index was designed for comedic purposes and meant to highlight researchers with minimal scholar contribution but oversized social media influence. We sought to examine attitudes and understanding of the Kardashian index by conducting a retrospective observational study of tweets retrieved from the Twitter API, Academic Track. From July 30th, 2014 to May 1st, 2021, 5826 unique tweets containing the phrase "Kardashian index” or relat…
How Often do Medical Specialties Question the Practices that They Perform? An Empirical, Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Published Literature
An aspect of overuse is who decides which practices are evaluated for overuse and which of the studies on overuse are published in the medical literature. We sought to examine the frequency with which studies in medical journals questioned an established practice. As a secondary objective, we sought to determine if there was variance among medical specialties. We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional review of the published literature in 14 …
The Ethical Obligation for Research During Public Health Emergencies
In times of crises, public health leaders may claim that trials of public health interventions are unethical. One reason for this claim can be that equipoise —i.e. a situation of uncertainty and/or disagreement among experts about the evidence regarding an intervention—has been disturbed by a change of collective expert views. Some might claim that equipoise is disturbed if the majority of experts believe that emergency public health intervention…
University-age vaccine mandates
For the first comparison, we weighed predicted hospitalisations prevented by one booster dose of BNT162b2 with vaccine-associated SAEs from the manufacturer's randomised trial (3/5055).3 We found that the rate of expected SAEs would outweigh the benefits of the booster against hospitalisation by at least 18-fold. Lam and Nichols suggest that this was an inappropriate comparison, as not all SAEs result in hospitalisation. However, the definition o…
Covid-19 vaccine boosters for young adults
In 2022, students at North American universities with third-dose COVID-19 vaccine mandates risk disenrolment if unvaccinated. To assess the appropriateness of booster mandates in this age group, we combine empirical risk-benefit assessment and ethical analysis. To prevent one COVID-19 hospitalisation over a 6-month period, we estimate that 31 207–42 836 young adults aged 18–29 years must receive a third mRNA vaccine. Booster mandates in young adu…
Political science (8 works) · Law (7 works) · Medicine (6 works) · Healthcare cost, quality, practices (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Alternative medicine (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Family medicine (3 works) · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 works)