Lisa Börjesson
Biographic Data
| ID | 5845305 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Lisa Börjesson |
| GIVEN NAMES | Lisa |
| FAMILY NAME | Börjesson |
| SIGNATURE | BÖRJESSON L |
| AFFILIATIONS | Uppsala University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 1 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Re-purposing Excavation Database Content as Paradata
Although data reusers request information about how research data was created and curated, this information is often non-existent or only briefly covered in data descriptions. The need for such contextual information is particularly critical in fields like archaeology, where old legacy data created during different time periods and through varying methodological framings and fieldwork documentation practices retains its value as an important info…
Paradata in Documentation Standards and Recommendations for Digital Archaeological Visualisations
Digitalisation of research data and massive efforts to make it findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable has revealed that in addition to an eventual lack of description of the data itself (metadata), data reuse is often obstructed by the lack of information about the datamaking and interpretation (i.e. paradata). In search of the extent and composition of categories for describing processes, this article reviews a selection of standards …
Legacy in the Making – A Knowledge Infrastructural Perspective on Systems for Archeological Information Sharing
Archeological research depends on a complex infrastructure of information systems and services built on different funding models. The information systems enable innovative approaches and progress in information making, but each system also organizes information by means of the system design, the structures, and relations established and the terminologies promoted. This article adopts a knowledge infrastructural perspective on systems used for inf…
Research Outside The Academy
Information Policies for (Digital) Information in Archaeology
The introduction of digital data capturing and management technologies has transformed information practices in archaeology. Digital documentation and digital infrastructures are integrated in archaeologists' daily work now more than ever. International and national institutions and projects have contributed to the development of digital archiving and curation practices. Because knowledge production in archaeology depends heavily on documentation…
Legacy in the Making – A Knowledge Infrastructural Perspective on Systems for Archeological Information Sharing
Archeological research depends on a complex infrastructure of information systems and services built on different funding models. The information systems enable innovative approaches and progress in information making, but each system also organizes information by means of the system design, the structures, and relations established and the terminologies promoted. This article adopts a knowledge infrastructural perspective on systems used for inf…
Information Policies for (Digital) Information in Archaeology
The introduction of digital data capturing and management technologies has transformed information practices in archaeology. Digital documentation and digital infrastructures are integrated in archaeologists' daily work now more than ever. International and national institutions and projects have contributed to the development of digital archiving and curation practices. Because knowledge production in archaeology depends heavily on documentation…
Information Policies for (Digital) Information in Archaeology
The introduction of digital data capturing and management technologies has transformed information practices in archaeology. Digital documentation and digital infrastructures are integrated in archaeologists' daily work now more than ever. International and national institutions and projects have contributed to the development of digital archiving and curation practices. Because knowledge production in archaeology depends heavily on documentation…
Research Outside The Academy
Paradata in Documentation Standards and Recommendations for Digital Archaeological Visualisations
Digitalisation of research data and massive efforts to make it findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable has revealed that in addition to an eventual lack of description of the data itself (metadata), data reuse is often obstructed by the lack of information about the datamaking and interpretation (i.e. paradata). In search of the extent and composition of categories for describing processes, this article reviews a selection of standards …
Legacy in the Making – A Knowledge Infrastructural Perspective on Systems for Archeological Information Sharing
Archeological research depends on a complex infrastructure of information systems and services built on different funding models. The information systems enable innovative approaches and progress in information making, but each system also organizes information by means of the system design, the structures, and relations established and the terminologies promoted. This article adopts a knowledge infrastructural perspective on systems used for inf…
Re-purposing Excavation Database Content as Paradata
Although data reusers request information about how research data was created and curated, this information is often non-existent or only briefly covered in data descriptions. The need for such contextual information is particularly critical in fields like archaeology, where old legacy data created during different time periods and through varying methodological framings and fieldwork documentation practices retains its value as an important info…
Computer Science (4 works) · Archaeology (3 works) · Data science (3 works) · Digital and Traditional Archives Management (3 works) · World Wide Web (3 works) · Documentation (2 works) · Geography (2 works) · Metadata (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Research Data Management Practices (2 works)