Ernest M Weiler
Biographic Data
| ID | 5853787 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Ernest M Weiler |
| GIVEN NAMES | Ernest M |
| FAMILY NAME | Weiler |
| SIGNATURE | WEILER E M |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Cincinnati |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 12 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 8 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1987 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2003 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Loudness Adaptation
In the present study, the authors tested the hypothesis that contrast effects confound the Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP). Bidirectional referents were used in which base tones of 50 or 70 dB alternated with referents of greater or lesser intensity in a 3.5-min listening period. The contrast hypothesis leads to the expectation that the bidirectional referents would produce opposing effects that should nullify time-based loudness changes in…
Monaural Loudness Adaptation for Middle-Intensity Middle-Frequency Signals
Using the Simple Adaptation technique (SA) and the Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP), the authors studied monaural loudness adaptation to a middle-intensity [60 dB(A)] tone at signal frequencies of 250, 1000, and 4000 Hz in the left and right ears. Adaptation effects were absent when the SA procedure was used. However, they were observed uniformly across all frequency values with the ICP, a result that challenges the assertion in the literatu…
Ipsilateral Loudness Adaptation Over Multiple Intensity Levels
Could monaural loudness adaptation be a simple artifact of psychophysical contrast? From adaptation data based on the Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP), A. J. Dange, J. S. Warm, E. M. Weiler, and W. N. Dember (1993) concluded that loudness adaptation was not an artifact of psychophysical contrast, but their conclusion was dependent on results from one intensity. This study, involving multiple intensities, re-examined the issue of contrast ver…
Visual Evoked Potentials in Early Alzheimer's Dementia
Topographical maps of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded from 10 possible Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and 10 control subjects. The purpose of the study was to determine if the two types of VEPs could function as a diagnostic screening for AD. Results of the statistical analysis did not reveal any latency differences between VEPs for the components elicited by either the pattern shift visual evoked potential (PSVEP)--or flash visu…
Loudness Adaptation
Traditional measurement of loudness adaptation based on binaural matching has been challenged by Scharf (1983) and others as an artifact of binaural interaction due to contrast effects. Weiler, Sandman, and Pederson (1981) addressed this problem by developing a monaural technique called the ipsilateral comparison paradigm (ICP), which demonstrates strong adaptation effects within the auditory system. The two experiments described in this report s…
Introduction
Four Triggering Factors in Loudness Adaptation
A factor analysis was used to determine whether induced loudness adaptation (Botte, Canevet, & Scharf, 1982; Scharf, 1983) and adaptation measured by Hood's (1950) classic Simultaneous Dichotic Loudness Balance technique (SDLB) would cluster on the same factors. The two phenomena did not cluster on the same factors; thus, induced adaptation cannot replace SDLB adaptation. Four independent factors that trigger auditory adaptation were identified i…
Redundancy
The present study examined the similarities between four auditory adaptation techniques to determine whether the effects were correlated. The four adaptation techniques compared were: Simultaneous Dichotic Loudness Balance technique (SDLB; Hood, 1950), Magnitude Estimated Binaural technique (MEB; Botté, Canévet, & Scharf, 1982), Magnitude Estimated Monaural technique, (MEM; Weiler, Sandman, & Pederson, 1981), and the Monaural Reaction Time techni…
Loudness Adaptation
Traditional measurement of loudness adaptation based on binaural matching has been challenged by Scharf (1983) and others as an artifact of binaural interaction due to contrast effects. Weiler, Sandman, and Pederson (1981) addressed this problem by developing a monaural technique called the ipsilateral comparison paradigm (ICP), which demonstrates strong adaptation effects within the auditory system. The two experiments described in this report s…
Four Triggering Factors in Loudness Adaptation
A factor analysis was used to determine whether induced loudness adaptation (Botte, Canevet, & Scharf, 1982; Scharf, 1983) and adaptation measured by Hood's (1950) classic Simultaneous Dichotic Loudness Balance technique (SDLB) would cluster on the same factors. The two phenomena did not cluster on the same factors; thus, induced adaptation cannot replace SDLB adaptation. Four independent factors that trigger auditory adaptation were identified i…
Redundancy
The present study examined the similarities between four auditory adaptation techniques to determine whether the effects were correlated. The four adaptation techniques compared were: Simultaneous Dichotic Loudness Balance technique (SDLB; Hood, 1950), Magnitude Estimated Binaural technique (MEB; Botté, Canévet, & Scharf, 1982), Magnitude Estimated Monaural technique, (MEM; Weiler, Sandman, & Pederson, 1981), and the Monaural Reaction Time techni…
Monaural Loudness Adaptation for Middle-Intensity Middle-Frequency Signals
Using the Simple Adaptation technique (SA) and the Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP), the authors studied monaural loudness adaptation to a middle-intensity [60 dB(A)] tone at signal frequencies of 250, 1000, and 4000 Hz in the left and right ears. Adaptation effects were absent when the SA procedure was used. However, they were observed uniformly across all frequency values with the ICP, a result that challenges the assertion in the literatu…
Ipsilateral Loudness Adaptation Over Multiple Intensity Levels
Could monaural loudness adaptation be a simple artifact of psychophysical contrast? From adaptation data based on the Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP), A. J. Dange, J. S. Warm, E. M. Weiler, and W. N. Dember (1993) concluded that loudness adaptation was not an artifact of psychophysical contrast, but their conclusion was dependent on results from one intensity. This study, involving multiple intensities, re-examined the issue of contrast ver…
Redundancy
The present study examined the similarities between four auditory adaptation techniques to determine whether the effects were correlated. The four adaptation techniques compared were: Simultaneous Dichotic Loudness Balance technique (SDLB; Hood, 1950), Magnitude Estimated Binaural technique (MEB; Botté, Canévet, & Scharf, 1982), Magnitude Estimated Monaural technique, (MEM; Weiler, Sandman, & Pederson, 1981), and the Monaural Reaction Time techni…
Four Triggering Factors in Loudness Adaptation
A factor analysis was used to determine whether induced loudness adaptation (Botte, Canevet, & Scharf, 1982; Scharf, 1983) and adaptation measured by Hood's (1950) classic Simultaneous Dichotic Loudness Balance technique (SDLB) would cluster on the same factors. The two phenomena did not cluster on the same factors; thus, induced adaptation cannot replace SDLB adaptation. Four independent factors that trigger auditory adaptation were identified i…
Loudness Adaptation
Traditional measurement of loudness adaptation based on binaural matching has been challenged by Scharf (1983) and others as an artifact of binaural interaction due to contrast effects. Weiler, Sandman, and Pederson (1981) addressed this problem by developing a monaural technique called the ipsilateral comparison paradigm (ICP), which demonstrates strong adaptation effects within the auditory system. The two experiments described in this report s…
Introduction
Visual Evoked Potentials in Early Alzheimer's Dementia
Topographical maps of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded from 10 possible Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and 10 control subjects. The purpose of the study was to determine if the two types of VEPs could function as a diagnostic screening for AD. Results of the statistical analysis did not reveal any latency differences between VEPs for the components elicited by either the pattern shift visual evoked potential (PSVEP)--or flash visu…
Ipsilateral Loudness Adaptation Over Multiple Intensity Levels
Could monaural loudness adaptation be a simple artifact of psychophysical contrast? From adaptation data based on the Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP), A. J. Dange, J. S. Warm, E. M. Weiler, and W. N. Dember (1993) concluded that loudness adaptation was not an artifact of psychophysical contrast, but their conclusion was dependent on results from one intensity. This study, involving multiple intensities, re-examined the issue of contrast ver…
Monaural Loudness Adaptation for Middle-Intensity Middle-Frequency Signals
Using the Simple Adaptation technique (SA) and the Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP), the authors studied monaural loudness adaptation to a middle-intensity [60 dB(A)] tone at signal frequencies of 250, 1000, and 4000 Hz in the left and right ears. Adaptation effects were absent when the SA procedure was used. However, they were observed uniformly across all frequency values with the ICP, a result that challenges the assertion in the literatu…
Loudness Adaptation
In the present study, the authors tested the hypothesis that contrast effects confound the Ipsilateral Comparison Paradigm (ICP). Bidirectional referents were used in which base tones of 50 or 70 dB alternated with referents of greater or lesser intensity in a 3.5-min listening period. The contrast hypothesis leads to the expectation that the bidirectional referents would produce opposing effects that should nullify time-based loudness changes in…
Medicine (8 works) · Audiology (7 works) · Computer Science (7 works) · Adaptation (eye (6 works) · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (6 works) · Loudness (6 works) · Psychology (6 works) · Neuroscience (5 works) · Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (4 works) · Monaural (4 works)